similar to: Line Graph - Greater than 2 variables on plot

Hello, I am trying to complete a PCA on a set of standardized ring widths from 8 different sites (T10, T9, T8, T7, T6, T5, T3, and T2). The following is a small portion of my data: T10 T9 T8 T7 T6 T5 T3 T2 1.33738 0.92669 0.91146 0.98922 0.9308 0.88201 0.92287 0.91775 0.82181 1.05319 0.92908 0.97971 0.95165 0.98029 1.14048 0.77803 0.88294 0.96413 0.90893 0.87957 0.9961 0.74926 0.71394 0.70877

Dear list members, I am using Mclust in order to deconvolute a distribution that I believe is a sum of two gaussians. First I can make a model: > my.data.model = Mclust(my.data, modelNames=c("E"), warn=T, G=1:3) But then, when I try to plot the result, I get the following error: > mclust1Dplot(my.data.model, parameters = my.data.model$parameters, what = "density")

Hi all, Suppose I have a 4 x 2 matrix A and I want to select the values in second column such that the value in first column equals to k. I gave the colnames as alpha beta, so I was trying to access the info using A$beta[A[,1]==k], however, I was told it's not a data frame, I can get the object by using dollar sign. I tried data.frame(A), but it didn't work. Any input

Hello, I would like to perform a Partial least square discriminate analysis (PLSDA) in R. To do this I use the package mixOmics. I could perform the PLSDA in R. however I would also like to perform a leave-one-out cross validation in order to assess the performance of my model. My supervisor told me that I should focus on the R2/Q2 ratios. However when I read the instruction for running the

--- Miroslav Lichvar <lichvarm@phoenix.inf.upol.cz> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:51:02AM -0500, Brady Patterson wrote: > > ... But it seems to me that you could make a decent guess > > about when something "new" happens based on the second derivative > of the signal > > (where the first derivative is the difference between a given > sample and the

Dear Members of the Help List, Honestly, I feel a little bit stupid - I would like to do something rather simple: fit a non linear model to existing data, to be more precise I wanted to start with simple higher order polynomials. Unfortunately, I do not quite understand the examples in the helpfiles for the nlm, nls and nlsModel commands. Could anyone please provide a simple example to get me

Hi there, Does anyone know how to extract elements from the table returned by Manova()? Using the univariate equivalent, Anova(), it's easy: a.an<-Anova(lm(y~x1*x2)) a.an$F This will return a vector of the F-values in order of the terms of the model. However, a similar application using Manova(): m.an<-Manova(lm(Y~x1~x2)) m.an$F Returns NULL. So does any attempt at calling the

Hello everyone, I am using *mlogit* to analyse my choice experiment data. I have *3 alternatives* for each individual and for each individual I have *9 questions*. I have a response from *516 individuals*. So it is a panel of 9*516 observations. I have arranged the data in long format (it contains 100 columns indicating different variables and identifiers). In mlogit I tried the following

(The list appears to have eaten my previous attempt to send this. Apologies if you receive multiple copies.) The attached patches allow you to use paravirtualised network and block interfaces from fully virtualised domains, based on Intel''s patches from a few months ago. These are significantly faster than the equivalent ioemu devices, sometimes by more than an order of magnitude.