similar to: unequal variance assumption for lme (mixed effect model)

How does one implement a likelihood-ratio test, to test whether the variances of the random effects differ between two groups of subjects? Suppose your data consist of repeated measures on subjects belonging to two groups, say boys and girls, and you are fitting a linear mixed-effects model for the response as a function of time. The within-subject errors (residuals) have the same variance in

I'am trying to develop some code if R, which would correspond to what I did in SAS. The data look like: Treatment Replicate group1 GSI Control A 1 0.81301 Control B 1 1.06061 Control C 1 1.26350 Control D 1 0.93284 Low A 2 0.79359 Low B

I found this paper on ANOVA on unequal error variance. Has this be incorporated to any R package? Is there any textbook that discuss the problem of ANOVA on unequal error variance in general? http://www.jstor.org/stable/2532947?cookieSet=1

Hi all, I have probably a basic question, but I can't seem to find the answer in the literature or in the R-archives. I would like to do a robust ANCOVA (using either rlm or lmRob of the MASS and robust packages) - my response variable deviates slightly from normal and I have some "outliers". The data consist of 2 factor variables and 3-5 covariates (fdepending on the model).

Hello, I have some patient data for my masters thesis with three groups (n=16, 19 & 20) I have completed compiling the results of 7 tests, for which one of these tests the variances are unequal. I wish to perform an ANOVA between the three groups but for the one test with unequal variance (<0.001 by both bartlett and levene's test) I am not sure what to do. I thought i would run

Hello - I am fairly new to R, (i.e., ability to create functions/write programs insignificant) and was wondering if there might be a convenient way to model the following: I want to fit a gaussian glm to grouped data, while allowing for unequal variances in each of the groups. More specifically, my data set looks something like this: ---------------- data group 1 76 1 2 82 1 3

Could some kindly tell me if I am supposed to be getting the same test statistic value with var.equal=TRUE and var.equal=FALSE in t.test ? set.seed(1066) x1 <- rnorm(50) x2 <- rnorm(50) t.test(x1, x2, var.equal=FALSE)$statistic # 0.5989774 t.test(x1, x2, var.equal=TRUE)$statistic # 0.5989774 ??? Here are my own calculations that shows that perhaps the result when var.equal=TRUE is

Well fellow R users, I throw myself on your mercy. Help me, the unworthy, satisfy my employer, the ungrateful. My feeble ramblings follow... I've searched R-Help, the R Website and done a GOOGLE without success for a one way ANOVA procedure to analyse data that are both non-normal in nature and which exhibit unequal variances and unequal sample sizes across the 4 treatment levels. My

Hi, i'm looking for an R function to fit a one-way ANOVA with one factor containing 10 levels. The factor levels have different numbers of observations (varying between 20 to 40). For most of the dependent variables i'm testing there are unequal variances among the factor levels. I see the function oneway.test: oneway.test(variable ~ factor, data=dataset) which by default does not

Hello- I have run an ANOVA on 4 treatments with unequal sample sizes (n=9,7,10 and 10). I want to determine where my sig. differences are between treatments using a Bonferroni test, and have run the code: pairwise.t.test(Wk16, Treatment, p.adf="bonf") I receive an error message stating that my arguments are of unequal length: Error in tapply(x, g, mean, na.rm = TRUE) :

A couple of questions: How to be sure that gls allowes errors to be correlated and/or have unequal variances? (is this on auto or is there a switch?) How to calculate confidence limits for a linear regresssion? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dthompson.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 303 bytes Desc: Card for David Thompson Url :

Han-Lin I don't think I have seen a reply so I will suggest that maybe you could try a different approach than what you are thinking about doing. I believe the current best practice is to use the weights as a covariate in a regression model - and bytheway - the weights are the inverse of the probabilities of selection - not the probabilities. Fundamentally, there is a difficulty in making

Dear R help, In limma package, contrasts.fit() function is very useful. I am wondering whether there is a similar function for lme object, which means given a mixed linear model fit, compute estimated coefficients and standard errors for a given set of contrasts. Thanks, Shirley

Hi, I would like to fit a model for a factorial design that allows for unequal variances in all groups. If I am not mistaken, this can be done in lm by specifying weights. A function intended to specify weights for unequal variance structures is provided in the nlme library with the varIdent function. Is it apropriate to use these weights with lm? If not, is there another possibility to do

Hello, I?ve tried several times to learn R, but have never gotten past a particular gate. My data are organized by column in Excel, with column headers in the first row. The columns are of unequal lengths. I export them as CSV, then import the CSV file into R. I wish to summarize the data by column. R inserts NA for missing values, then refuses to operate on columns with NA. R is importing

Hi I am trying to run an ANOVA on data with unequal variance. I am new to nlme, but to my understanding I need to use the gls function. I have single response variable (distance which is continuous) and the explanatory variable is individual ID (class variable: individuals differ in the variance in their distance values hence the need to using nlme). So I would create a model

Hi all, right now i am simply comparing means. obviously this can be done by the simple t.test respectively the welch test, if var.equal is set to FALSE. just like this t.test( Y ~ group) t.test( Y ~ group, var.equal = FALSE) now that i need to compare weighted means i am using the lm function as an adjusted t-test: like lmtest <- ( Y ~ group ) anova(lmtest)

Hi, I am doing multiple regression, and have several X variables that are categorical. I read that I can use dummy or contrast codes for that, but are there any special rules when there're unequal #observations in each groups (4 females vs 7 males in a "gender" variable)? Also, can R generate these codes for me? THanks.

I'm working with a nested model (mixed). I have four factors: Patients, Tissue, sex, and tissue_stage. Totally I have 10 patients, for each patient, there are 2 tissues (Cancer vs. Normal). I think Tissue and sex are fixed. Patient is nested in sex,Tissue is nested in patient, and tissue_stage is nested in Tissue. I tried aov and lme as the following, > aov(gene ~ tissue + gender +

Without recycling you would get: u <- c(10, 20, 30) u + 1 #[1] 11 20 30 which would be pretty inconvenient. (Note that the recycling rule has to make a special case for when one argument has length zero - the output then has length zero as well.) Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Maingo via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote: