similar to: Loading problem with XML_1.9

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Loading problem with XML_1.9"

2015 Sep 04
5
RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 03:11:39PM -0700, Mehdi Amini wrote: > > > On Sep 4, 2015, at 11:38 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:13:43AM -0700, Mehdi Amini wrote: > >> > >>> On Sep 4, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> >
2020 May 07
2
Ld64.lld cannot find Foundation framework
Dear LLVM community I need some help please. I want to use LLVM's clang and lld within a MacOSX sandboxed app. This is because sandboxing does not allow calls to /usr/bin/clang. The clang binary works fine to compile a file, but ld64.lld comes up with the error "cannot find framework". However similar arguments using /usr/bin/ld instead of ld64.lld works fine. Here are the
2015 Sep 04
2
RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:13:43AM -0700, Mehdi Amini wrote: > > > On Sep 4, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:48 AM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Sep 4, 2015, at 12:22 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo
2015 Sep 04
2
RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:48 AM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > On Sep 4, 2015, at 12:22 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:45 PM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > On Sep 2, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev < >>
2015 Sep 04
2
RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:45 PM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sep 2, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 01:10:42AM +0000, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:43 AM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < > >>
2013 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] Best way to do a lto bootstrap on OS X
AFAIK, ld does not use DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH to lookup libLTO.dylib but contains a reference to @executable_path/../lib/libLTO.dylib. The only way I managed to load a different LTO library than the default one is to create a symlink pointing to the actual ld binary (as returned by 'xcrun -find ld') and making sure the library I want to load is placed at ../lib/libLTO.dylib relatively to this
2015 Sep 03
4
RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 01:10:42AM +0000, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:43 AM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < > dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 2015-Aug-31, at 18:09, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:50 PM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
2015 Sep 01
2
RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier
> On 2015-Aug-31, at 18:09, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:50 PM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > > On 2015-Aug-31, at 12:21, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yep. This is where I was going :) > > Glad I found consensus, but I want to
2013 Nov 12
3
[LLVMdev] Best way to do a lto bootstrap on OS X
For dogfooding the compiler I normally use is a LTO bootstrap of clang. On linux that is simple to do that since clang passes the correct plugin to the linker. On OS X ld64 uses libLTO.so it finds via DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH. Should clang set that before running the linker? Is there a better way for clang to tell the linker which libLTO.so to use? Cheers, Rafael
2017 Jun 07
3
LLD support for ld64 mach-o linker synthesised symbols
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > OK. I see that the Mach-O linker is not even built when LLD is enabled in > Release_40, only the PE/COFF and ELF linkers are built. > > From looking at reviews it appears that Clang was able to be linked with > LLD on Darwin about 2 years ago, so Mach-O support seems to have
2020 May 07
2
Ld64.lld cannot find Foundation framework
Thanks for your reply. Two questions: 1). Will ld64.lld be fixed in LLVM v11.0 and when is this likely to be? 2). You mention Apple’s linker, by which I assume you mean GNU’s ld. Is it possible to get a binary version of ld (preferably that does not use other things from /usr/bin)? Thanks > On 7 May 2020, at 12:26, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > > The MachO
2009 Dec 04
1
[LLVMdev] Transparent LTO on Mac OS X
I'm confused. libLTO takes bitcode files as input and creates a native object file as output. Why would libLTO create bitcode as output? If so, you're changing the existing API contract. Or are you creating an out-of-band bitcode file, in which case the linker would never see it. ld doesn't have bitcode support, it has libLTO support, and libLTO is what processes the bitcode.
2015 Sep 01
3
RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier
> On 2015-Aug-31, at 12:21, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Yep. This is where I was going :) Glad I found consensus, but I want to double-check that this makes sense to add to the driver. I didn't quite think through the implications myself. Since the driver doesn't know if there's any bitcode, or if LTO is going to be invoked, it seems like I'll
2018 Jan 08
0
Fwd: LLD (macOS) usage?
I believe what's happening here is that clang translates the -fuse-ld=lld into calling the ld.lld executable, which is actually the ELF LLD linker, not the Mach-O one. On 6.0, the Mach-O linker symlink is called ld64.lld instead (and clang has been changed to call out to that name) to disambiguate the two. For 5.0, I'm not sure how best to force the Mach-O linker (I'm not familiar with
2017 Jun 14
1
LLD support for mach-o aliases (weak or otherwise)
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I’m working on a port of musl libc to macos (arch triple is “x86_64-xnu-musl”) to solve some irreconcilable issues I’m having with libSystem.dylib. I don’t want to use glibc for various reasons, mainly because I want to static link. I have static PIE + ASLR working
2017 Jun 06
4
LLD support for mach-o aliases (weak or otherwise)
Hi Folks, I’m working on a port of musl libc to macos (arch triple is “x86_64-xnu-musl”) to solve some irreconcilable issues I’m having with libSystem.dylib. I don’t want to use glibc for various reasons, mainly because I want to static link. I have static PIE + ASLR working which is not actually supported by the Apple toolchain (*1), but I managed to get it to work. I’m sure Apple might say
2015 Feb 03
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > >> On 2015 Feb 3, at 13:26, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jroelofs.lists at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2/3/15 12:08 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote:
2018 Jan 07
1
LLD (macOS) usage?
MachO support in lld is not really ready for real world usage. It was able to bootstrap itself a couple of years ago, but, it has not really been maintained or further developed since. I would recommend that you use ld64 if you are intending to build MachO binaries. > On Jan 7, 2018, at 9:57 AM, Don Hinton via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm seeing
2017 Jun 14
4
LLD support for mach-o aliases (weak or otherwise)
> On Jun 14, 2017, at 2:47 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On 15 Jun 2017, at 6:50 AM, Louis Gerbarg <lgerbarg at apple.com <mailto:lgerbarg at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at
2007 Aug 03
2
RSPython won't load in R 2.6.0 under Linux
I can compile RSPython without difficulty, been when I try to load it, I get the error messages below. Also below are some cryptic warnings I get on R boot (in case these are pertinent) and my sessionInfo(). Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Mark Warning messages: 1: In .updateMethodsInTable(fdef, where, attach) : Couldn't find methods table for "conditional", package