similar to: error message survreg.fit

Hi All, I have strings made up of an unknown number of letters, digits, and spaces. Strings always start with one or two letters, and always end with one or two digits. A set of letters (one or two letters) is always followed by a set of digits (one or two digits), possibly with one or more spaces between the sets of letters and digits. A set of letters always belongs to the following set of

Hi All, I want to automatically generate a number of data frames, each with an automatically generated name and an automatically generated number of rows. The number of rows has been calculated before and is different for all data frames (e.g. c(4,5,2)). The number of columns is known a priori and the same for all data frames (e.g. c(3,3,3)). The resulting data frames could look something like

Hi All, Sorry if I ask an obvious thing, I am still new to R ... I created a data frame of given dimensions to which I gave strings as column names. I want to write to elements of the data frame by indexing them with the row number and column name (string). The problem is that I can read elements from the data frame in this way, but I cannot assign to elements in this way. Instead, I get the

I am trying to use R to do loglogistic hazard estimation. My plan is to generate a loglogistic hazard sample data and then use survreg to estimate it. If everything is correct, survreg should return the parameters I have used to generate the sample data. I have written the following code to do a time invariant hazard estimation. The output of summary(modloglog) shows the factor loading of

Hi, I'm estimating a loglogistic aft (accelerated failure time) model, just a simple plain vanilla one (without time dependent covariates), I'm comparing the results that I obtain between aftreg (eha package) and survreg(surv package). If I don't use any covariate the results are identical , if I add covariates all the coefficients are the same until a precision of 10^4 or 10^-5 except

I a trying to use survreg to fit a Weibull distribution. From the last few messages I understand how to interpret the parameters. However, how do I get the covariance of lambda and alpha? Is there a predict command for that? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Survreg-function-for-loglogistic-hazard-estimation-tp893503p1604918.html Sent from the R help mailing list

Hello, I am using survreg for a simulation where data is randomly generated from a Weibull distribution and the model parameters estimated. When this is embedded within a loop and the process repeated for different datasets, the program aborts after a few runs in most cases giving the following message: Error in survreg.fit(X, Y, weights, offset, init = init, controlvals = control, :

R users, I am making model selection with an accelerated failure time model using the command survreg within the library survival. As I want to compare models with different probability distributions I need to have the full likelihood. How can I find out what survreg generates: the full likelihood or a likelihood with "unnecessary" constants dropped? Example I want to

Hello R users, I'm trying to do simulations for comparing cox and weibull I have come across this problem: Warning messages: 1: In survreg.fit(X, Y, weights, offset, init = init, controlvals = control, : Ran out of iterations and did not converge 2: In survreg.fit(X, Y, weights, offset, init = init, controlvals = control, : Ran out of iterations and did not converge what i did is

Dear all, What is the cumulative distribution (with parameterization) used within survreg with respect to the log-logistic distribution? That is, how are the parameters linked to the survivor function? Best regards, Mario [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

> I was wondering why survreg (in survival package) can not handle > three-way interactions. I have an AFT ..... You have given us no data to diagnose your problem. What do you mean by "cannot handle" -- does the package print a message "no 3 way interactions", gives wrong answers, your laptop catches on fire when you run it, ....? Also, make sure you read

Hi, I'm trying to fit a tobit regression model to some data. When fitting the exact same data in Stata, I have no problems at all, however R won't converge. Its not a maxiters thing, since I've tried increasing this already. I need to be able to fit the model in R since there are users of the code that don't have a Stata license. The code is: require(AER) left = 3.218476 x =

Hi I'm trying to predict the values for a survreg object called loglogistic_na. Here is the definition of loglogistic_na and following that the syntax used for the predict function. But upon execution I don't get any output. Not sure what I'm doing wrong: loglogistic_na <- survreg(Surv(time_na,event_na) ~ t_na, dist="loglogistic") summary(loglogistic_na)

Dear R users: I am using survreg for modeling left censored longitudinal data. When I am using the following code for fitting the tobit model I am getting some output with an warning message(highlighted with red color): > survreg(Surv(y, y>=0, type='left')~x + frailty(id), cytokine.data, weight=w, dist='gaussian', scale=1) Call: survreg(formula = Surv(y, y >= 0, type

Hola a tod@s, Hace poco en la lista se discutieron algunas aproximaciones para determinar la distribución de probabilidad que potencialmente podrían haber generado los datos (ver [1]) y una de ellas fué el AIC. Haciendo uso del programa enviado por Pablo Verde (ver [1]), estos son los resultados para mis datos: weibull , AIC = 69839.44 exponential , AIC = 79488.77 gaussian , AIC = 69413.03

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:08 PM, <fra.meucci@hotmail.it> wrote: > Dear Göran Broström, > I am trying to use AFTREG function for R to estimate a loglogistic > survival function, including time dependent covariates. > Actually, my Subset includes some partial events; the idea is to model > this kind of events using something similar to “weights” in the SURVREG > function.

> Hi > > I'm trying to predict the values for a survreg object called loglogistic_na. Here is the definition of loglogistic_na and following that the syntax used for the predict function. But upon execution I don't get any output. Not sure what I'm doing wrong: > > loglogistic_na <- survreg(Surv(time_na,event_na) ~ t_na, dist="loglogistic") >

Dear all, I am trying to find a suitable R-function for parametric proportional hazard regressions. The package survival contains the coxph() function which performs a Cox regression which leaves the base hazard unspecified, i.e. it is a semi-parametric method. The package Design contains the function pphsm() which is good for parametric proportional hazard regressions when the underlying base

Dear R-Helpers: I have tried everything I can think of and hope not to appear too foolish when my error is pointed out to me. I have some real data (18 points) that look linear on a log-log plot so I used them for a comparison of lm() and survreg. There are no suspensions. survreg.df <- data.frame(Cycles=c(2009000, 577000, 145000, 376000, 37000, 979000, 17420000, 71065000, 46397000,

Can anybody give me a neat example of interval censored data analysis codes in R? Given that suvreg(Surv(c(1,1,NA,3),c(2,NA,2,3),type="interval2")~1) works why does survreg(Surv(data[,1],data[,2],type="interval2")~1) not work where data is : T.1 T.2 Status 1 0.0000000 0.62873036 1 2 0.0000000 2.07039068 1 3 0.0000000