similar to: Weighted least squares

Dear all, I'm struggling with weighted least squares, where something that I had assumed to be true appears not to be the case. Take the following data set as an example: df <- data.frame(x = runif(100, 0, 100)) df$y <- df$x + 1 + rnorm(100, sd=15) I had expected that: summary(lm(y ~ x, data=df, weights=rep(2, 100))) summary(lm(y ~ x, data=rbind(df,df))) would be equivalent, but

Dear all, When doing nonlinear regression, we normally use nls if e are iid normal. i learned that if the form of the variance of e is not completely known, we can use the IRWLS (Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares ) algorithm: for example, var e*i =*g0+g1*x*1 1. Start with *w**i = *1 2. Use least squares to estimate b. 3. Use the residuals to estimate g, perhaps by regressing e^2 on

Hi all, I met with a problem about the weighted least square regression. 1. I simulated a Normal vector (sim1) with mean 425906 and standard deviation 40000. 2. I simulated a second Normal vector with conditional mean b1*sim1, where b1 is just a number I specified, and variance proportional to sim1. Precisely, the standard deviation is sqrt(sim1)*50. 3. Then I run a WLS regression without the

Hi, I am fitting a weighted least square regression and trying to compute SSE,SST and SSReg but I am not getting SST = SSReg + SSE and I dont know what I am coding wrong. Can you help please? xnam <-colnames(X) # colnames Design Matrix fmla1 <- as.formula(paste("Y ~",paste(xnam, collapse=

Dear All, Which package/function could i use to solve following linear least square problem? A over determined system of linear equations is given. The nnls-function may would be a possibility BUT: The solving is constrained with a inequality that all unknowns are >= 0 and a equality that the sum of all unknowns is 1 The influence of the equations according to the solving process is

I got simple x,y pairs of data and simple scatterplot and just cannot figure how to do it , there are many examples but always there is error popping out please show me an example stripped with additional data just core of what I need to do to get this damn line -- View this message in context:

Hello, is it possible in R to calculate a Weighted averaging partial least squares regression? I'm not firm in statistics and didn't found anything about weighted averaging in combination with PLS in the help archives. Or is it possible to develop a workaround with the pls-package? thanks for help in advance Andreas Plank -- _____________________________________________ Dipl. Biol.

Howdy, In SPSS, there are 2 ways to weight a least squares regression: 1. You can do it from the regression menu. 2. You can set a global weight switch from the data menu. These two options have no, in my experience, been equivalent. Now, when I run lm in R with the weights= switch set accordingly, I get the same set of results you would see with option #1 in SPSS. Does anybody know how to

Hello, I have a data set of data which is best fit by an exponential decay function. I would like to use a nonlinear weighted least squares regression. What function should I be using? Thank you! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I encounter some discrepancies when comparing the deviance of a weighted and unweigthed model with the AIC values. A general example (from 'nls'): DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1) fm1DNase1 <- nls(density ~ SSlogis(log(conc), Asym, xmid, scal), DNase1) This is the unweighted fit, in the code of 'nls' one can see that 'nls' generates a vector

Dear All, I've been trying to run a Weighted Least Squares (WLS) regression: Dependent variables: a 60*200 matrix (*Rit*) with 200 companies and 60 dates for each company Independent variables: a 60*4 matrix (*Ft*) with 4 factors and 60 dates for each factor Weights: a 60*200 matrix (*Wit*) with weights for 200 companies and 60 dates for each company The WLS regression I would like to run

I need to find out the difference between the way R calculates weighted regression and standard regression. I want to plot a 95% confidence interval around an estimte i got from least squares regression. I cant find he documentation for this ive looked in ?stats ?lm ?predict.lm ?weights ?residuals.lm Can anyone shed light? thanks Chris. -- View this message in context:

Hi everyone, I admit I am a bit of an R novice, and I was hoping someone could help me with this error message: Warning message: In lm.fit(x, y, offset = offset, singular.ok = singular.ok, ...) : extra arguments weigths are just disregarded. My equation is: lm( Y ~ X1 + X2 + X3, weigths = seq(0.1, 1, by = 0.1)) -- View this message in context:

Hi there, I'm trying to fit a growth curve to some data and need to use a weighted least squares estimator to account for heteroscedasticity in the data. A weights argument is available in nls that would appear to be appropriate for this purpose, but it is listed as 'not yet implemented'. Is there another package which could implement this procedure? Regards, Robert Brown

How does one specify the weights for WLS in the systemfit command ? That is, there is a weight option in lm(), but there doesn't seem to be weight option for systemfit("WLS") Thanks!

Hi, The OpenSSH_3.7.1p2, Solaris 8 case: non-interactive authentication method (publickey) works for root only ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- We installed OpenSSH_3.7.1p2, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0.9.7c We need to copy a file by SFTP from App server to a DB server with passwordless method. [cbfe-dev-app01 (client), user cbfesit]

We have a choice when calculating the Huber location estimate: > set.seed(221205) > y <- 7 + 3*rt(30,1) > library(MASS) > huber(y)$mu [1] 5.9117 > coefficients(rlm(y~1)) (Intercept) 5.9204 I was surprised to get two different results. The function huber() works directly with the definition whereas rlm() uses iteratively reweighted least squares. My surprise is

R 1.6.2 for Windows, Win2k: I have fitted a weighted least squares model using the code "wls.out <- gls(y ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 - 1, data = foo.frame, weights = varConstPower(form = ~ fitted(.), fixed = list(power = 0.5), const = 1))" The data has 62 rows and the response is zero when the covariates are zero. The purpose of the model was to account for the the fact that

I might be sorry for asking this question :-) I have two equations and I tried to estimate them individually with "lm" and "gls", and then in a system (using systemfit) with "OLS", "WLS" and "SUR". Quite surprisingly (for myself at least) the results are identical to the last digit. Could someone (please!) give a hint as to what am I

I would like to obtain Confidence Intervals for the estimates (unstandardized beta weights) of each predictor in a WLS regression: m1 = lm(x~ x1+x2+x3, weights=W, data=D) SPSS offers that output by default, and I am not able to find a way to do this in R. I read through predict.lm, but I do not find a way to get the CIs for multiple independent variables. Thank you Torvon [[alternative HTML