similar to: initial value for optim in polr question

Hi, I'm getting an error message using polr(): Error in optim(start, fmin, gmin, method = "BFGS", hessian = Hess, ...) : initial value in 'vmmin' is not finite The outcome variable is ordinal and factored, and the independant variable is continuous. I've checked the source code for both polr() and optim() and can't find any variable called

I tried the following ordered logistic regression in R: mod1 <- polr(altitude~sp + wind_dir + wind_speed + hr, data=altioot) But when I asked The summary of my regression I got the folloing error message: > summary (mod1) Re-fitting to get Hessian Error in optim(start, fmin, gmin, method = "BFGS", hessian = Hess, ...) : the initial value of 'vmin' is not

Hi all. I'm just starting to explore ordinal multinomial regression. My dataset is 300,000 rows, with an outcome (ordinal factor from 1 to 9) and five independent variables (all continuous). My first stab at it was this: pomod <- polr(Npf ~ o_stddev + o_skewness + o_kurtosis + o_acl_1e + dispersal, rlc, Hess=TRUE) And that worked; I got a good model fit. However, a variety of other

Hello again I am trying to fit an ordinal logistic model using the polr function from MASS. When I run model.loan.ordinal <- polr(loancat~age + sex + racgp + yrseduc + needlchg + gallery + sniffball + smokeball + sniffher + smokeher + nicocaine + inject + poly(year.of.int,3) + druginj + inj.years) I get an error Error in optim(start, fmin, gmin, method = "BFGS", hessian =

Dear Sir, I get an error message when I use polr() in MASS package. My data is "ord.dat". I made "y" a factor. y y1 y2 x lx 1 0 0 0 3.2e-02 -1.49485 2 0 0 0 3.2e-02 -1.49485 3 0 0 0 1.0e-01 -1.00000 4 0 0 0 1.0e-01 -1.00000 5 0 0 0 3.2e-01 -0.49485 6 0 0 0 3.2e-01 -0.49485 7 1 1 0 1.0e+00 0.00000 8 0 0 0 1.0e+00 0.00000 9 1 1 0

Hello R-users, I am using polr function in library(MASS). The code I use is the following: polr(as.ordered(q23p)~.,data=as.data.frame(datapr2)) where datapr2 is a matrix of 63 columns (together with the dependent variable) and 1665 rows. But I am receiving the warning message Error in optim(start, fmin, gmin, method = "BFGS", hessian = Hess, ...) I would be very greatfull if anyone

Hello from a presently sunny Helsinki! I've bee trying to repeat an analysis I did about 18 months ago (the reviewers of the paper want something adding to it). I'm using R1.5.0, but I couldn't see anything in the list of changes between this and 1.5.1 to suggest it would act any differently. The data is observational, on the changes in the population status of carabid beetles, and

Dear all, I get an error message when I use polr() in MASS. These are my data: skugg grupp frekv 4 1 gr3 0 5 2 gr3 3 6 3 gr3 6 10 1 gr5 1 11 2 gr5 12 12 3 gr5 1 > > summary(polr(skugg ~ grupp, weights=frekv, data= skugg.cpy1.dat)) Error in optim(start, fmin, gmin, method = "BFGS", hessian = Hess, ...) :

Hi all!! I am using a proportinal odds model to study some ordered categorical data. I am trying to predict one ordered categorical variable taking into account only another categorical variable. I am using polr from the R MASS library. It seems to work ok, but I'm still getting familiar and I don't know how to assess goodness of fit. I have this output, when using response ~ independent

Hi all!! I am using a proportinal odds model to study some ordered categorical data. I am trying to predict one ordered categorical variable taking into account only another categorical variable. I am using polr from the R MASS library. It seems to work ok, but I'm still getting familiar and I don't know how to assess goodness of fit. I have this output, when using response ~ independent

Hey, everyone, I am using proportional odds model for ordinal responses in dose-response experiments. For some samll data, SAS can successfully provide estimators of the parameters, but the built-in function polr() in R fails. Would you like to tell me how to make some change so I can use polr() to obtain the estimators? Or anyone can give me a hint about the conditions for the existance of MLE

In polr.R the (several) functions gmin and fmin contain the code > theta <- beta[pc + 1L:q] > gamm <- c(-100, cumsum(c(theta[1L], exp(theta[-1L]))), 100) That's bad. There's no reason to suppose beta[pc+1L] is larger than -100 or that the cumulative sum is smaller than 100. For practical datasets those assumptions are frequently violated, causing the

hello everybody I'm a newbie with ordered probit and with polr too. The problem is that I have a dependent variable I need to explain with an ordered probit that is > head(dfscale$sod.sit.ec.fam,100) > [1] 5 7 5 6 5 5 6 8 6 8 8 8 6 6 6 5 0 5 NA 6 > [21] 7 NA NA 0 0 2 5 3 6 6 7 6 NA 8 6 6 7 NA NA NA > [41] 4 5 NA 10 3 9 10 10 7 5 5 5 NA

Hi - I am using polr. I can get a result from polr fit by calling result.plr <- polr(formula, data=mydata, method="probit"); However, from the 'result.plr', how can I access standard error of the estimated coefficients as well as the t statistics for each one of them? What I would like to do ultimately is to see which coefficients are not significant and try to refit the

Hi, I obtained all the coefficients that I need from polr. However, I'm wondering how I can obtain the standard error of each estimated coefficient? I saved the Hessian and do something like summary(polrObj), I don't see any standard error like when doing regression using lm. Any help would be really appreciated. Thank you! - adschai

Dear R Users/Experts, I am using a function called logitreg() originally described in MASS (the book 4th Ed.) by Venebles & Ripley, p445. I used the code as provided but made couple of changes to run a 'constrained' logistic regression, I set the method = "L-BFGS-B", set lower/upper values for the variables. Here is the function, logitregVR <- function(x, y, wt =

It has always been my understanding that deviance for GLMs is defined by; D = -2(loglikelihood(model) - loglikelihood(saturated model)) and this can be calculated by (or at least usually is); D = -2(loglikelihood(model)) As is done so in the code for 'polr' by Brian Ripley (in the package 'MASS') where the -loglikehood is minimised using optim; res <-

Sorry, I deleted my old post. Pasting the new query below. Dear R Users/Experts, I am using a function called logitreg() originally described in MASS (the book 4th Ed.) by Venebles & Ripley, p445. I used the code as provided but made couple of changes to run a 'constrained' logistic regression, I set the method = "L-BFGS-B", set lower/upper values for the variables. Here

Dear R experts: I am running some calculations using polr() in MASS library, and found some differences in results obtained on two different machines (IRIX 6.5, and Linux RH 7.1). It is not clear to me whether this is due to some error in my programming the calculation and how to resolve the differences, if possible. The polr() call is the following:

hello everybody solved the problem with summary, now I have another one eg I estimate > try.op <- polr( > as.ordered(sod.sit.ec.fam) ~ > log(y) + > log(1 + nfiglimin) + > log(1 + nfiglimagg) + > log(ncomp - nfiglitot) + > eta + > I(eta^2) + >