similar to: using cutree() to figure out the heatmap cluster labels on the left

I have the following code that perform hiearchical clustering and plot them in heatmap. __ library(gplots) set.seed(538) # generate data y <- matrix(rnorm(50), 10, 5, dimnames=list(paste("g", 1:10, sep=""), paste("t", 1:5, sep=""))) # the actual data is much larger that the above # perform hiearchical clustering and plot heatmap test <- heatmap.2(y)

I would like to draw horizontal or vertical lines on a heatmap to highlight the clusters at some specified cut depth of the dendrogram. As a hacked example, the following code would work if I could set the coordinates of the top and bottom of the false color image correctly (ymin and ymax), but the correct values seem to depend on the output device and its size. I realize that heatmaps use a 2x2

Hello, I've been clustering my data using hclust and cutting the resulting tree with cutree. Separately, I visualize the clusterings with heatmap. Is it possible to have the dendrogram on the heatmap reflect the cutree results? That is, instead of having one large dendrogram, it would have 4 or 25 in the example below. Any guidance on if that's possible or not, and what kinds of

I am making heatmaps for a dataset (~ 300*600 matrix) with the following R script (I am not familiar with R and this is the first time I am using it). library("gplots") library("Cairo") mydata <- read.csv(file="data.csv", header=TRUE, sep=",") rownames(mydata)=mydata$Name mydata <- mydata[,2:297] mydatamatrix <- data.matrix(mydata) mydatascale

Hi, I am trying to create a heatmap with some specific requirements. Specifically, I need to be able to center the color-scale around 0, and I need to truncate the data so that a few extreme values do not cause the rest of the heatmap to appear black (on a red/green scale). After reading through and experimenting with heatmap, heatmap.2, heatmap_plus, and heatmap_2, I believe heatmap.2 will

Hi! I just discovered that cutree() and cut.dendrogram() do not assign the same cluster numberings when called on the same tree. More specifically, cutree() assigns cluster numbers by order of appearance in the data, while cut.dendrogram() sorts clusters by height (see example below). I guess this is for historical reasons? I'm hit by this difference when I want to get a vector of cluster

Hi, I have a gene expression experiment with 20 samples and 25000 genes each. I'd like to perform clustering on these. It turned out to become much faster when I transform the underlying matrix with t(matrix). Unfortunately then I'm not anymore able to use cutree to access individual clusters. In general I do something like this: hc <- hclust(dist(USArrests), "ave")

I generated a heatmap in R using the following commands: > mydata <- read.csv(file="Data.csv", header=TRUE, sep=",") > mydata <- mydata[rowSums(mydata[,-1]^2) >0, ] > rownames(mydata)=mydata$Name > mydata <- mydata[,2:253] > mydatamatrix <- data.matrix(mydata) > mydatascale <- t(scale(t(mydatamatrix))) > hr <-

I generated a heatmap in R using the following commands: > mydata <- read.csv(file="Data.csv", header=TRUE, sep=",") > mydata <- mydata[rowSums(mydata[,-1]^2) >0, ] > rownames(mydata)=mydata$Name > mydata <- mydata[,2:253] > mydatamatrix <- data.matrix(mydata) > mydatascale <- t(scale(t(mydatamatrix))) > hr <-

I've found that while cutree() and rect.hclust() make the same classes for a given height in the dendrogram, the actual labeling of the classes is different. For example, both produce the same 4 classes but class 1 according to cutree() is class 4 according to rect.hclust(). Would it be possible that future versions provide the same labeling? rect.hclust() is useful to display the classes

Thanks a lot, Michael! I cc to R-help, where this question really belongs {as the 'Subject' suggests itself...} -- please drop 'bioconductor' from CC'ing further replies. >>>>> "michael" == michael watson (IAH-C) <michael.watson at bbsrc.ac.uk> >>>>> on Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:16:59 +0100 writes: michael> OK, admittedly it

Hi Sorry if this is in the help :-S I've looked at example(dendrogram) and though it gives some indication of what I want, it doesn't do all. OK, so here is what I want to do: draw a tree, and then have an action, on user-click, to either draw a sub tree or a plot of the data. I also want users to be able to search for a particular label and have it highlighted on the tree, say in

Hi, this is rather a (presumed) bug report than a question because I can solve my personal statistical problem by working with hclust instead of agnes. I have done a complete linkage clustering on a dist object dm with 30 objects with agnes (R 1.8.0 on RedHat) and I want to obtain the partition that results from a cut at height=0.4. I run > cl1a <- agnes(dm, method="complete")

Hi, this is rather a (presumed) bug report than a question because I can solve my personal statistical problem by working with hclust instead of agnes. I have done a complete linkage clustering on a dist object dm with 30 objects with agnes (R 1.8.0 on RedHat) and I want to obtain the partition that results from a cut at height=0.4. I run > cl1a <- agnes(dm, method="complete")

Hello all, A question/suggestion: I was wondering if there is a chance of changing stats::cutree to be S3 and use cutree.hclust? For example: cutree <- function(tree, k = NULL, h = NULL,...) { UseMethod("cutree") } cutree.hclust <- stats::cutree # This will obviously need the actual content of stats::cutree This would be nicer for people like me to add new methods to

I have been attempting to do some work using hclust, and have run into a (possibly subtle) problem. The background is that I constructed a dissimilarity matrix ``d1'' (it involved something called the ``Jaccard similarity coefficient''; I won't go into the details unless requested). I then did d2 <- as.dist(d1) try <- hclust(d2,method=ward)

Dear R Helpers, I read carefully the documentation and all postings on the hclust and cutree functions, however some aspects of the tree ordering and cluster assignment performed by these functions remain unclear to me, so I would very much appreciate your help in making sure I get them right. Here is an example, with values chosen to illustrate the problems. I have a set of five profiles

Hello, I would like to cut a hclust tree into several groups at a specific similarity. I assume this can be achieved by specifying the "h" argument with the specified similarity, e.g.: clust<-hclust(dist,"average") cut<-cutree(clust,h=0.65) Now, I would like to draw rectangles around the branches of the dendrogram highlighting the corresponding clusters, as is done by

Hi, I have the distance matrix computed and I feed it to hclust function. The plot function produces a dense dendrogram as well. But, the cutree function applied does not produce the desired list. Here is the code x=data.frame(similarity_matrix) colnames(x) = c(source_tags_vec) rownames(x) = c(source_tags_vec) clust_tree=hclust(as.dist(x),method="complete") plot(clust_tree)

Hi , I am trying to plot a heatmap with a correlation matrix and trying to highlight significant correlations . i am using my matrix d874n has 78 columns ex2<-corAndPvalue(data.matrix(d874n),use = "pairwise.complete.obs") ##creating a matrix of true false using p values sig<-ex2$p<0.05 nx=78 ny=78 makeRects <- function(tfMat,border){ cAbove =