similar to: How to repress the annoying complains from X window system

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "How to repress the annoying complains from X window system"

2012 May 24
11
[PATCH 0/3] XEN: fix vmx exception mistake
This series of patches fix the mistake for debug exception(#DB), overflow exception(#OF) and INT3(#BP), INTn instruction emulation. Introduce new function vmx_inject_sw_exception() which deliver the software excetion, software interrupt and privileged software exception. Split hardware exception as a seperate function(old function vmx_inject_hw_exception()). Also Passed down intruction length
2005 Sep 05
1
tcltk, X11 protocol error: Bug?
Hi, I am having trouble debugging this one. The code is attached below, but it seems to be a problem at the C-tk interface. If I run this 1 time there are no problems if I run it more than once I start to get warnings that increase in multiples of 11 everytime I run it. Here is a sample session > source("clrramp2.r") Loading required package: tcltk Loading Tcl/Tk interface ... done
2009 Jul 03
1
fix() and edit() not working with Rcmdr and german LANG-variable
Dear Mailinglist, I just set up an R 2.9.1 environment with Rcmdr 1.4-6 on Ubuntu Jaunty 9.04. As I'm from Germany my $LANG variable is set to "de_DE.UTF-8". Now, when I open up Rcmdr and try to edit a new datamatrix there is no edit window appearing: Datenmatrix <- edit(as.data.frame(NULL)) ERROR: invalid device In addition, there are plenty of warning messages in the
2007 Jul 10
1
overlay boxplot
hi, All: I need to overlay two boxplot, I played around with points() but found it does not seem to work with boxplot, it works fine with other. Is there a way to overlay two boxplot (using different color) in R? There was a thread talking about using ggplot package, however, I don't think there is a final solution... the answer give does not give overlay but a new plot. Thanks Hao
2004 Aug 30
1
Rcmdr X11 protocol error message
I am using R 1.9.1 with R Commander GUI under Windows at work, and under Linux Mandrake 10 OR at home. I am having no problems running R Commander under windows. Under Linux, though, the opening and sometimes closing of windows from R Commander produces identical and repetitive error messages (in dialogue boxes and mirrored in the console): >"Warning: X11 protocol error: BadWindow
2006 May 03
4
BadWindow : X or Wine or...
i tried running a couple apps in wine remotely, piping X to my powerbook w/ OS 10.4.6 which otherwise works fine. thus i think this is wine- or app-specific. i get similar errors (see below) in different apps. on the surface, looks like bad window or pointer. i figure wine can't find the right libs for display on the client... do i just need a PATH to my the libs on my client? e.g.
2004 Mar 19
2
X forwarding and BadWindow error
Has anybody else experienced weird X11 forwarding problems such as the one below: andreas at teste10:~> x3270 X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) Major opcode of failed request: 3 (X_GetWindowAttributes) Resource id in failed request: 0x404372 Serial number of failed request: 833 Current serial number in output stream: 834 or andreas at teste10:~>
2011 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
hi all, i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc the fucntion i have defined and declared at the begining of the module ie i have written a pass derived from a module pass virtual bool runOnModule(Module & M){ // i declared the fucntion and defined it for (Module::iterator a = M.begin(), b = M.end(); a != b; for (Function::iterator i = a->begin(), e =
2001 Oct 10
1
X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
Hi, I got a new laptop and have been updating all my tools. All the wine apps I need working are running fine except Street Atlas 8.0 which I got running fine on my old laptop. I am failing with the latest wine-cvs from Oct 9th with the following: X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) Major opcode of failed request: 4 (X_DestroyWindow) Resource id in failed
2010 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] Why function pointer is different from other data type?
"float (i32)* (float (i32)*)*" is not a return type. According to the description of the 'call' instruction in LLVM Assembly Language Reference Manual (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_call) this is a signature of the pointer to function value being invoked (which includes the return type). In your case the full signature is printed because get_ptr returns a pointer to
2010 Apr 12
2
[LLVMdev] Why function pointer is different from other data type?
I'm sorry that I should remove the comment. In fact my question is about the "float (i32)* (float (i32)*)*", why we use this kind of return type instead of just "float (i32)*". Thanks a lot. Hao On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Hao Shen, > >> %4 = call float (i32)* (float (i32)*)* @get_ptr(float (i32)* @a1)
2006 Oct 31
1
Fw: domU network problem , 10/30 progress
Hao Yu Commercial Scale Out IBM T.J. Watson Research Center 1101 Kitchawan Rd/Route 134, Rm 36-019 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-0218 914-945-1854, Email: yuh@us.ibm.com ----- Forwarded by Hao Yu/Watson/IBM on 10/31/2006 09:52 AM ----- Jimi
2006 Oct 31
1
Fw: domU network problem , 10/30 progress
Hao Yu Commercial Scale Out IBM T.J. Watson Research Center 1101 Kitchawan Rd/Route 134, Rm 36-019 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-0218 914-945-1854, Email: yuh@us.ibm.com ----- Forwarded by Hao Yu/Watson/IBM on 10/31/2006 09:52 AM ----- Jimi
2010 May 12
1
[LLVMdev] How can I remove Intrinsic Functions during llvm-gcc compilation?
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:19 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > SHEN Hao wrote: >> Thanks a lot for your answer. >> As what you said, I can not have any options to avoid generating this kind >> of intrinsic for byte code. Is it possible to modify gcc and ask it take >> all memset liked functions as a general function call? I know this solution
2011 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
2011/4/25 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc > > you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic > block. > However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. > Yes, i mean before the termininator, My problem is how to call a method suppose
2007 Mar 20
1
starting wine with window size gives error.
I am starting wine with the command: wine explorer /desktop=Name,640x480 PPTVIEW.EXE myppt.ptt and I get the following error: [silentm@geisjdell PowerPoint Viewer]$ fixme:actctx:QueryActCtxW 80000010 0x3018b4d0 (nil) 1 0x34fb60 8 (nil) X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) Major opcode of failed request: 1 (X_CreateWindow) Resource id in failed request:
2005 Sep 21
2
win.metafile on linux?
Dear R-help, Is it possible to use win.metafile() on *nix versions of R? I tried R 2.1.1 on FreeBSD and R 1.9.0 on redhat with no success. I need to give some graphs generated in R to my boss so that he can modify them in Powerpoint to fit he style of his presentation. Recommendations on other methods are appreciated as well. Hao -- : Hao Chen, Ph.D. : Instructor : Department of
2010 May 10
2
[LLVMdev] How can I remove Intrinsic Functions during llvm-gcc compilation?
Thanks a lot for your answer. As what you said, I can not have any options to avoid generating this kind of intrinsic for byte code. Is it possible to modify gcc and ask it take all memset liked functions as a general function call? I know this solution is less performance efficient, but I would like to have it for my llvm assembly level modification works. But anyway, thanks for you help. Hao
2010 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] How can I remove Intrinsic Functions during llvm-gcc compilation?
SHEN Hao wrote: > Thanks a lot for your answer. > As what you said, I can not have any options to avoid generating this kind > of intrinsic for byte code. Is it possible to modify gcc and ask it take > all memset liked functions as a general function call? I know this solution > is less performance efficient, but I would like to have it for my llvm > assembly level modification
2010 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] i80 data type
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Hao Shen, > >> Is there anyone who knows well i80 data type? Is there any >> corresponding data type >> for X86 processor? uint80_t or int80_t for gcc? > > no, there is no native processor support for i80. GCC does not have > a direct equivalent to i80. However if you declare a