similar to: Comparing entire row sets at once efficiently

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 07:15:39PM +0100, Renato Golin wrote: > On 12 October 2016 at 18:37, <sylvain.bertrand at gmail.com> wrote: > > Suggestion is not clear answer. How such a decision taken? Is there a board of > > people which have to vote to valid the choice of minimal gcc (and clang) version > > effective? > > We don't have such process, unfortunately.

Hi, The problem is modern c++. I can have a reasonable system boostrape-ed with (tinycc/alternative C compiler), but only in the gcc world since a modern c++ compiler is only bootsrape-able from near any C compiler there. clang and llvm are unable to do it. That why I would need to get 2 gccs: "any C compiler" -> gcc 4.7.4 -> gcc recent_version -> llvm. On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at

Hi to all! Sorry for my English :) The problem: We have a shaper software based on tc linux shaper/filter. This software (''shaper'') work with one interface (''eth0'') with fixed bandwidth and limit user (above 100 user each time) bandwidth accordingly user''s tariff plan. User traffic filter based on destination (user) ip. There a lot of connection

Just for the interest of discussion, I find it completely weird and interesting that GCC needs to build itself 3 times to fully bootstrap. Has there been any interest in looking at a single compile build? I don't exactly know the limitations, but my naive thinking is that C++14 compiler source parsed by C++14 capable compiler and codegen'd to C99 (or older) source should make it compilable

I think scev-aa does not succeed on the original example, because front ends do not put "nsw" on signed addition, so according to llvm rules addition can overflow and i can be < 0. Also, if original example used unsigned type (e.g. size_t, which is very common), I don't think ir can express the fact that i is guaranted to be >= 0. Another line of reasoning is that if

Though there is a problem in this setup. The end-user and hosting provider have signed SLA agreement in which some amount of memory is guaranted for the guest. The good thing is that this memory will be given to the guest when the guest will really need it (f.e. with OOM in guest and with VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM configuration flag set). The bad thing is that end-user does not know this.

Though there is a problem in this setup. The end-user and hosting provider have signed SLA agreement in which some amount of memory is guaranted for the guest. The good thing is that this memory will be given to the guest when the guest will really need it (f.e. with OOM in guest and with VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM configuration flag set). The bad thing is that end-user does not know this.

Good morning everyone, I noticed some mobile client connections that I know should have timed out at least 20 mins ago, yet these are still there. The device in question lost its 3G connection and never re-established it. I know, because in this case it was my 'phone ;) Why should the imap-login keep the copnnection in in EST, when it was dropped ages ago. I imagine that the mobile

Hi First I must say that I`am an author of HTB auto-configurator (so I know some about QoS under linux) and I have read a lot of articles about HFSC, but I still don`t know how to configure this algoritm properly. Maybe somone can help me and write a little example for me (the best will be Patrick McHardy who has ported HFSC to linux) - please just three queues. My situation: Let say I have 1Mbit

Estimated people, I have two matrices: ar1 <- array(data=c(1:16),dim=c(4,4)) ar2 <- array(data=c(1,2,3,3,5:16),dim=c(4,4)) They only differ in the fourth row. I would like to compare them in order to know which columns are equal. The following works, but I would like to have a better solution, and not to use what someone called "prehistorical loops": for(i in

Hello.. I have a linux box and I want to make priority on traffic generated by my LAN''s computers.. I don''t have a guaranted bandwidth, so I wanna use sfq... I want to make traffic to port 80 , 443 , 25 & 110 PRIORITY 1 Traffic src or dest 192.168.0.2 to make priority 2 And the rest to put it in proiority 3.. I did the following : tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:

Hi, I''m a bit confused with the priority of different classes with HTB. How it will be? Will the class with lowest no: have maximum priority? Any help is most appreciated, Thanks in advance, Sanjeev -- ______________________________________________ Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox. Powered by

Hi, I am trying to compile "iproute2" (iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try.tar.gz, inclusively the latest HTB patch, activated diffserv components) on a SuSE-Linux 8.2 system (using "gcc 3.3", system based on "glibc 2.3.2"). It is no problem as long as I use the kernel header files of linux-2.4.20 (vanilla), linux-2.4.20.SuSE (special kernel patched by SuSE, shipped

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:55:51 +0100 Axel Kittenberger <axkibe at gmail.com> wrote: > > Has someone experience with collecting the changed files > > with a third party tool which detects which files were changed? > > I don't know of sysdig but am the developer of Lsyncd which does > exactly that, collect file changes via inotify event mechanism and > then calls

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 04:15:44PM +0100, Renato Golin wrote: > On 12 October 2016 at 14:34, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > So I'd first like to understand whether we still want to keep gcc 4.7 as a > > supported version, or move to 4.8 as was suggested. What is the process for > > making that change? > > >

Hi, machine: AMD K6 200 MHz Linux distribution: Mandrake 8.1 kernel: compiled 2.4.21 applied this: #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU in file linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h bevore compiled the kernel (described on http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/40.html) bandwitch on eth0: 128kbit The most simple configuration - 122kbit guaranted for WWW (sport 80) and

On Jun 27, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Eugene Toder wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Are you referring to my reasoning for why _length and _data[i] do not > alias? No, I was referring to the discussion of C99 6.7.2.1, 6.5.6, 6.2.6, and so on. > I don't think this needs TBAA or any "strict" aliasing rules. > All that sufficient is 1) assumption about struct layout: >

Greetings all, We are proud to announce the release of LDTP 1.7.0. This release features number of important breakthroughs in LDTP as well as in the field of Test Automation. This release note covers a brief introduction on LDTP followed by the list of new features and major bug fixes which makes this new version of LDTP the best of the breed. Useful references have been included at the end of

Dear all, I have postfix delivering to dovecot lda (via spamassinassin). I have configured the quota plugin, but it does not seem to respect the details in the quota table in mysql. The query I have used looks correct to me, and the user can connect to the database. I wonder if someone might put me straight on the misconfiguration. Best wishes, j. # Relevant portions of dovecot -n:

[Sorry, resending with a proper subject line!] Hi Guru's... I have a set of points that may lie along any of the x, y and z axes in a Cartesian coordinate system. I am hoping that a function exists which will determine if any two selected points are on different axes, i.e, if the one of the points is on x and the other on y or z, not elsewhere on the x axis. Put another way, I need