similar to: failed installing rgl

I'm running R 2.4.1 (with the latest versions of all packages) on an FC6 32-bit system. When I try to install the rgl package, compilation fails: > install.packages("rgl") --- Please select a CRAN mirror for use in this session --- Loading Tcl/Tk interface ... done trying URL 'http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/R/CRAN/src/contrib/rgl_0.70.tar.gz' Content type

Dear all, I have looked for an answer for a couple of days, but can't come with any solution. I have a set of functions, say: > t0 <- function(x) {1} > t1 <- function(x) {x} > t2 <- function(x) {x^2} > t3 <- function(x) {x^3} I would like to find a way to add up the previous 4 functions and obtain a new function: > rrr <- function(x) {1+x+x^2+x^3} without,

Dear all, I tried to install rgl package on my linux machine fc5, I got an error. Here I run R as user, $ R > options(repos=c(CRAN="http://cran.at.r-project.org/")) > install.packages("rgl", lib="/home/subianto/local/lib/R/library/site-packages", dependencies=TRUE) trying URL 'http://cran.at.r-project.org/src/contrib/rgl_0.67-2.tar.gz' Content type

Hi, I just installed R-2.3 for Tiger 10.4.6 on a PPC. However, though i successfully installed RGL on R.2.2, this time it doesn't compile. I get this error when trying the R INSTALL command In file included from Texture.hpp:14, from Material.hpp:5, from BBoxDeco.hpp:16, from BBoxDeco.cpp:1: opengl.hpp:22:19: error: GL/gl.h: No such

Dear all, While running some code requiring the "tcltk" package I have realised that my version of R was compiled with the Tcl/Tk libraries included in Fedora 6. It would be for me better to use the ActiveTcl libraries (which I have under /usr/local), and I'm aware that this probably means to recompile R with the proper configuration variables. But...is it by any chance

Hi, I recently had a problem installing the rgl package on OS X and put together a simple patch. The patched package is available here: http://jinome.stanford.edu/files/rgl_0.66-patched_for_gcc4.tar.gz It can be installed with "R CMD INSTALL rgl_0.66-patched_for_gcc4.tar.gz" as normal at the command line. Also -- as of right now rgl is not in the repository of version 2.3 packages

I tried building boost 1.45 release with clang 2.9 following instructions on http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/clang-builds-boost.html but got the following result: $ clang++ --version clang version 2.9 (trunk 123420) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10 Thread model: posix $ ./bjam toolset=clang Building the Boost C++ Libraries. Performing configuration checks - has_icu builds : no

Hi folks, man page says "By default, rsync will delete any partially transferred file if the transfer is interrupted" I have (reproducible) a partial file left, if I do CTRL-C source-dir: mounted LVM XFS dest-dir: see source-dir Ubuntu 12.04.1 (LTS) kernel 3.2.0-39-generic command: rsync -a

I use the Hitec Aurora 9 (A9) transmitter for my remote control vehicles. http://www.hitecrcd.com/products/aircraft-radios-receivers-and-accesories/aircraft/aurora9/aurora-9-2-4ghz.html This transmitter is part of a system of devices. One of the devices in this system is the HPP-22, which is a USB device that allows a computer to communicate with the A9 in order to load and save model

Hi Nick! In r207467 you added code(libunwind: DwarfInstructions.hpp): assert(lastReg <= (int)cieInfo.returnAddressRegister && "register range does not contain return address register"); for (int i = 0; i <= lastReg; ++i) { ..... else if (i == (int)cieInfo.returnAddressRegister) There is misprint here: lastReg should be >=

I've just installed Debian Lenny and RBGL fails compilation with the following errors (sessionInfo() follows). * Installing *source* package 'RBGL' ... untarring boost include tree... ** libs g++ -I/home/mkimpel/R_HOME/R-patched/R-build/lib64/R/include -I/usr/local/include -IboostIncl -fpic -g -O2 -c bbc.cpp -o bbc.o In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.3/ext/hash_set:64,

3.9.0 and current release_39 (r90413) have issues with older static assertion macros like this one from an older libunwind: #define COMPILE_TIME_ASSERT( expr ) \ extern int compile_time_assert_failed[ ( expr ) ? 1 : -1 ] __attribute__( ( unused ) ); I notice that the issue is fixed on current trunk. Does anyone know what revision introduced the fix? Can we get it

I was wondering if anyone has encountered this issue when cross compiling cuda on Nvidia TX2 running android. The error is In file included from <built-in>:1: In file included from prebuilts/clang/host/linux-x86/clang-4667116/lib64/clang/7.0.1/include/__clang_cuda_runtime_wrapper.h:219: ../cuda/targets/aarch64-linux-androideabi/include/math_functions.hpp:3477:19: error: no matching function

> On Dec 22, 2016, at 9:36 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > 3.9.0 and current release_39 (r90413) have issues with older static assertion macros like this one from an older libunwind: > > #define COMPILE_TIME_ASSERT( expr ) \ > extern int compile_time_assert_failed[ ( expr ) ? 1 : -1 ] __attribute__( (

> On Dec 23, 2016, at 11:17, Frédéric Riss <friss at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Dec 22, 2016, at 9:36 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> 3.9.0 and current release_39 (r90413) have issues with older static assertion macros like this one from an older libunwind: >> >> #define

It already shipped AFAIK: http://releases.llvm.org/download.html — Mehdi > On Dec 27, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Akira Hatanaka via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Can we still check patches into 3.9.1? > >> On Dec 24, 2016, at 1:47 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 23, 2016, at 11:17,

Can we still check patches into 3.9.1? > On Dec 24, 2016, at 1:47 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Dec 23, 2016, at 11:17, Frédéric Riss <friss at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 22, 2016, at 9:36 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>

+Artem Belevich <tra at google.com> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:53 PM Bharath Bhoopalam via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has encountered this issue when cross compiling > cuda on Nvidia TX2 running android. > > The error is > In file included from <built-in>:1: > In file included from >

+Tom : is there a plan for a 3.9.2? — Mehdi > On Dec 27, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > It already shipped AFAIK: http://releases.llvm.org/download.html > > — > Mehdi > >> On Dec 27, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Akira Hatanaka via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Can we still check patches into

There's a regression in AMDGPU which would be nice to get resolved, see: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99078 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-3.9/+bug/1656620?comments=all I think it's reasonably low-risk to back-port AMDGPU: Reduce the duration of whole-quad-mode AMDGPU: Do not clobber SCC in SIWholeQuadMode since they've been in trunk and