similar to: Multiple tests on 2 way-ANOVA

I have run the following logistic regression model: options(contrasts=c("contr.treatment", "contr.poly")) m <- glm(wolf.cross ~ null.cross + feature, family = "binomial") where: wolf.cross = likelihood of wolves crossing a linear feature null.cross = proportion of random paths that crossed a linear feature feature = CATEGORY of linear feature with 5 levels:

Dear R-helpers: My question is how do I efficient and valid correct for multiple tests in a repeated measurement design: Suppose we measure at two distinct visits with repeated subjects a treatment difference on the same variable. The treatment differences are assessed with a mixed model and adjusted by two methods for multiple tests: # 1. Method: Adjustment with library(multcomp)

Dear R community, I performed a generalized linear mixed model using glmmPQL (MASS library) to analyse my data i.e : y is the response with a poisson distribution, t and Trait are the independent variables which are continuous and categorical (3 categories C, M and F) respectively, ind is the random variable. mydata<-glmmPQL(y~t+Trait,random=~1|ind,family=poisson,data=tab) Do you think it

I?m trying to set up proportional hazard model that is stratified with respect to covariate 1 and has an interaction between covariate 1 and another variable, covariate 2. Both variables are categorical. In the following, I try to illustrate the two problems that I?ve encountered, using the lung dataset. The first problem is the warning: To me, it seems that there are too many dummies

First, here is your message as it appears on R-help. On 10/14/2012 05:00 AM, r-help-request@r-project.org wrote: > I?m trying to set up proportional hazard model that is stratified with > respect to covariate 1 and has an interaction between covariate 1 and > another variable, covariate 2. Both variables are categorical. In the > following, I try to illustrate the two problems that

I can use stepAIC on an lme object in 1.6.2, but I get the following error if I try to do the same in 1.7.0: Error in lme(fixed = resp ~ cov1 + cov2, data = a, random = structure(list( : unused argument(s) (formula ...) Does anybody know why? Here's an example: library(nlme) library(MASS) a <- data.frame( resp=rnorm(250), cov1=rnorm(250), cov2=rnorm(250),

the study design of the data I have to analyse is simple. There is 1 control group (CTRL) and 2 different treatment groups (TREAT_1 and TREAT_2). The data also includes 2 covariates COV1 and COV2. I have been asked to check if there is a linear or quadratic treatment effect in the data. I created a dummy data set to explain my situation: df1 <- data.frame( Observation =

I have a fairly large model: > length(Y) [1] 3051 > dim(covariates) [1] 3051 211 All of these 211 covariates need to be nested hierarchically within a grouping "class", of which there are 8. I have an accessory vector, " cov2class" that specifies the mapping between covariates and the 8 classes. Now, I understand I can break all this information up into individual

Hello, I am a new R user and trying to learn how to implement the mahalanobis function to measure the distance between to 2 population centroids. I have used STATISTICA to calculate these differences, but was hoping to learn to do the analysis in R. I have implemented the code as below, but my results are very different from that of STATISTICA, and I believe I may not have interpreted the help

I'm trying to make a set of contour plots of bivariate kernel density estimates, showing three such plots overlaid, similar to this plot http://euclid.psych.yorku.ca/SCS/Private/Test/ridge-boot2.pdf except that I would like to have the contours *filled* (using transparent colors). To make this reproducible, I've saved the results of KernSmooth::bkde2D() in the following file:

Hi all I do not understand why I am getting the following error message. Can anybody help me with this? Thanks in advance. install.packages("cmprsk") library(cmprsk) result1 <-crr(ftime, fstatus, cov1, failcode=1, cencode=0 ) one.pout1 = predict(result1,cov1,X=cbind(1,one.z1,one.z2)) predict.crr(result1,cov1,X=cbind(1,one.z1,one.z2)) Error: could not find function

Hello, I have a question regarding competing risk regression using cmprsk package (function crr()). I am using R2.9.1. How can I do to assess the effect of qualitative predictor (gg) with more than two categories (a,b,c) categorie c is the reference category. See above results, gg is considered like a ordered predictor ! Thank you for your help Jan > # simulated data to test > set.seed(10)

Hi, what I would need are 2 vector pairs (x,y) and (x1,y1). x and x1 must have the same sd. y and y1 should also exhibit the same sd's but different ones as x and x1. Plotting x,y and x1,y1 should produce a plot with 2 vectors having a different slope. Plotting both vector pairs in one plot with fixed axes should reveal the different slope. many thanks syrvn -- View this message in

Dear R-help list, I would like to perform multiple comparisons for lme. Can you report to me if my way to is correct or not? Please, note that I am not nor a statistician nor a mathematician, so, some understandings are sometimes quite hard for me. According to the previous helps on the topic in R-help list May 2003 (please, see Torsten Hothorn advices) and books such as Venables &

Hey, I am confused about how to generate the sample data from a mixture of Multivariate Gaussian ditribution. For example, there are 2 component Gaussian with prior probability of 0.4 and 0.6, the means and variances are u1=[1 1]', Cov1=[1 0;0 1] and u2=[-1 -1]', Cov2=[1 0;0 1] repectively. So how can I generate a sample of 500 data from the above mixture distribution? Thanks. Fred

I suppose that multcomp in R and multicomp in S-Plus are related and it appears that it is possible to use multicomp with lme in S-Plus given the following correspondence on s-news sally.rodriguez at philips.com 12:57 p.m. 24/04/03 -0400 7 [S] LME summary and multicomp.default() Is it possible to use multicomp with lme in R and if so what is the syntax from a simple readily available

Hi, I'm trying to figure out how anova works in R by translating the examples in Sokal And Rohlf's (1995 3rd edition) Biometry. I've hit a snag with planned comparisons, their box 9.4 and section 9.6. It's a basic anova design: treatment <- factor(rep(c("control", "glucose", "fructose", "gluc+fruct",

Hi, I have a data.frame with many variables for which I am performing the mean by subgroup, for a pair of variables at a time, where one of them for each pair defines the subgroup. The subgroups in the x$cm1 are 0, 1 and 2. x ph1 cm1 0.2345 2 1.2222 1 2.0033 0 0.0000 2 1.0033 1 0.2345 0 1.2222 2 2.0033 0 0.0000 1 1.0033 2 > meanbygroup <- as.vector(with(x, by(x$ph1, x$cm1, mean)))

Hi, Alan Really very excited to receive your email and sorry to be slow replying, it has been exceptionally busy over the last few days ;( Your explanation made the problem clear to me. So gcov branch coverage should be called condition coverage and clang region coverage is branch coverage in fact(also known as *decision/C1*), right? And llvm/clang will support all the following coverage

Hi all, How can one evaluate NAs in a numeric dataframe column? For example, I have a dataframe (demo) with a column of numbers and several NAs. If I write demo.df >= 10, numerals will return TRUE or FALSE, but if the value is "NA", "NA" is returned. But if I write demo.df == "NA", it returns as "NA" also. I know that I can remove NAs, but would like