similar to: TukeyHSD for repeated measures aov ?

I cannot find what is the function label for matrix inversion in R. I have found 'ginv' for the moore-penrose in the MASS package, but there is probably a simple inversion operator in the base package. Where can I find it? ____________________________________________ Yvonnick Noel, PhD. University of Lille 3 Department of Psychology F-59653 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex (+33) 320 41 63 48

I now use blur plugin thanx to window matching feature, thanx David ;) I have some bugs: http://hibbert.univ-lille3.fr/~cbellegarde/blur_4xbilinear_bug.png Here, i have some artefacts bugs with 4xbilinear. This blur mode is fast! May be a Nvidia drivers bug... http://hibbert.univ-lille3.fr/%7Ecbellegarde/blur_gaussian_fast.png Here, an amarok big window with just desktop, moving window is

Dear all, I need to understand a thing in the beheaviour of the two functions aov and anova in the following case involving an analysis of ANOVA with repeated measures: If I use the folowing command I don´t get any problem: >aov1 = aov(response ~ stimulus*condition + Error(subject/(stimulus*condition)), >data=scrd) > summary(aov1) Instead if I try to fit the same model for the

Hi R-help members, I have read a lot in the Archive about the "Type I" vs "Type III" sum of square. I think I have read confusing post so I want to have a clear idea of the problem. Here is an example. I have 3 groups of subjects of unequal sample size (G1 (n=7), G2 (n=7), G3 (n=4)). for Each subject I have 4 measures corresponding to the crossing of 2 factor (A & B)

Hai, If its really Debian 9, then i dont think, this is not going to work. >> /etc/openldap/ldap.conf I suggest the following. apt-get install ca-certificates mkdir -p /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/samba-ad-dc ln -s /var/lib/samba/private/tls/cert.pem /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/samba-ad-dc/samba.crt update-ca-certificates /etc/ldap/ldap.conf BASE dc=some,dc=dom,dc=tld URI

Server type : - Ms Active Directoy - OpenLDAP - Lotus Domino - Other Connection type : - Standard LDAP - LDAP+SSL Authentication type : - Simple - Anonymous Le mar. 6 ao?t 2019 ? 11:49, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 06/08/2019 10:23, Guillaume Couvreur wrote: > > image.png > > I don't konw the query > > It will be something

Distro : Debian 9 log samba and smb as attachments Le mar. 6 ao?t 2019 ? 09:33, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 06/08/2019 07:54, Guillaume Couvreur via samba wrote: > > Hello, here are the google logs. > > > > *[2019-08-05 17:04:31,544+0200] [SwingWorker-pool-1-thread-2] [ERROR] > > [plugin.ldap.AbstractLdapHandler] Failed to

Hello R People: Here's the Saturday night goofy question. I would like to see the code for TukeyHSD function and I tried the following: > getAnywhere("TukeyHSD") A single object matching ?TukeyHSD? was found It was found in the following places package:stats namespace:stats with value function (x, which, ordered = FALSE, conf.level = 0.95, ...)

Okay, it's done. Here is the file Le mar. 6 ao?t 2019 ? 10:55, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 06/08/2019 09:36, Guillaume Couvreur wrote: > > it doesn't work, here is the log file > > Nothing there, can you try raising the log level ? > > start by adding: > > log level = 4 > > to smb.conf and restart Samba and

I can prove I've done this before, but I recently installed Rexcel (and it was easiest to reinstall R and some other bits to make it work) and now its no longer working. Before I would do an ANOVA and a tukey post-hoc like this: >data1.aov=aov(result~factor1*factor2, data=data1) then... >TukeyHSD(summary(data1.aov)) and it would give me a nice tukey table of all the pairwise

I would like to do a one way anova and then a tukeyHSD. I have three vectors A,B and C. In a previous help message, I was told to do the following for the anova: y = c(A,B,C) group = factor(rep(a:3,c(7,9,13))) #provided there a 7 elements in A,9 in B and 13 in C and then anova(lm(y~group)) Looking at the tukeyHSD method it looks like it wants the aov method which I don't understand.

pairwise.t.test is returning NAs when one of the samples only has one entry, while TukeyHSD returns results (maybe not trustworthy or believable, but results). I stumbled on this because I did not realize one of my samples only had one entry while most of the others had several hundred, so I realize this is not a desirable situation. I'm really just curious about the difference between how

Hello everyone, So I ran an anova with aov and then I want to run post-hoc comparisons but keep receiving this message : > no applicable method for "TukeyHSD" Here is my code: > d<-read.table("d.txt") > d > Obs subj Hand Gaze RT > 1 1 s1 1 1 401.4 > 2 2 s2 1 1 363.3...... > summary(ano <-

I have a question about TukeyHSD and the glht function because I'm getting different answers when a covariate is included in model for ANCOVA.? I'm using the cabbages dataset in the 'MASS' package for repeatability.? If I include HeadWt as a covariate, then I get different answers when performing multiple comparisons using TukeyHSD and the glht function. The difference appears

Dear R community, I'm trying to understand this behavior of TukeyHSD. My goal is to obtain defensible, labelled multiple comparisons of an interaction term. Firstly, if I plot the TukeyHSD from the model that calculates its own interactions, then the y-axis labels appear to be reflected on their median when compared to the text output of the TukeyHSD statement. The labels are integers.

I've tried to run a Tukey post-hoc but keep getting this weird error, whether the aov was significant or not. treat_code is a dummy variable, but that shouldn't matter. Any suggestions? Thanks Amy > summary(aov(EtoH~treat_code, mydata)) Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) treat_code 1 16.44 16.44 11.027 0.001014 ** Residuals 287 427.91 1.49 --- Signif.

Hello, When plotting the results of a TukeyHSD multiple comparisons procedure with an ANOVA (lm) object, an extra line appears in the confidence intervals that contain 0. For example (this is straight from the TukeyHSD helpfile): > summary(fm1 <- aov(breaks ~ wool + tension, data = warpbreaks)) > TukeyHSD(fm1, "tension", ordered = TRUE) > plot(TukeyHSD(fm1,

Why do I see this error? > library(stats) > require(stats) [1] TRUE > > tHSD <- TukeyHSD(aov) Error in TukeyHSD(aov) : no applicable method for "TukeyHSD" In case it helps: > aov Call: aov(formula = roi ~ (Cue * Hemisphere) + Error(Subject/(Cue * Hemisphere)), data = roiDataframe) Grand Mean: 8.195069 Stratum 1: Subject Terms: Residuals Sum

Attached follows a patch to a minor change in the plot method of the TukeyHSD class (package stats). Basically it defines main= and xlab= as formal arguments of the plot function, with reasonable default values, passing them to title(), instead of using hard-coded only values for main= and xlab=. This way it's possible to change the title and xlab of the plots created using plot.TukeyHSD().

Hello, I am trying to determine the most appropriate way to run post-hoc comparisons on my lme model. I had originally planned to use Tukey HSD method as I am interested in all possible comparisons between my treatment levels. TukeyHSD, however, does not work with lme. The only other code that I was able to find, and which also seems to be widely used, is glht specified with Tukey: