similar to: Surface plot

Hi, trying this again - any help would be great! Basically, I have two matrices of equal dimension, one of them should produce something similar to a heatmap.. The 2nd matrix should be the "heights" for each value on the heatmap - producing a sort of 3d surface plot. Viewing this seems like a problem too, as I need to scale the x axis so that ~140 labels are visible. I've tried

Hi, I'm trying to do a surface plot using the wireframe function. Everything is working beautifully except that I want to be able to re-scale it a LOT so that I can fit ~145 labels on the x-axis or y-axis. I've tried using zoom, scales, aspect, .. nothing seems to work. The help on wireframe in R says that you can input a list of labels for any of the axes, but this has also failed.

Hello Dear, I have a function, like z=f(x,y), and try a surface plot with this function. But, on the reference of "wireframe" requires data option, so I generated x and y, and computed z with them. But, still I have a problem to draw a surface plot. The code and errors are ################################################## mle_beta0=64.43707; mle_beta1=-24365.16; # generating for

It is a trivial matter to adjust the linewidth of the axes and plot line in a 2D plot: x <- 1:10; y <- 1:10; par(lwd=2); # axis (and others) linewidth plot(x,y,"l",lwd=6); # plot linewidth Is there anything comparable to this for persp or wireframe? I've tried a number of ways, and the framebox/axes seem to be linked to the linewidth used in generating the

Hi, I would like to plot a matrix which comprises 3 columns. So first column should be the x-axis. Second the y-axis and the third one should be the z-axis. I know that I can plot such data using the scatterplot3d, but I would like to have a surface plot like you can do with wireframe and persp. But both, persp and wireframe, want to have x and y as descending data, at least persp. I am not sure

Dear helplist members, I have been using 'wireframe()' to make 3d plots using the following call: wireframe (temp ~ xc2 * mc2, screen = list(z = 230, x = -70, y = 0), scales = list (arrows = FALSE)) and these three vectors: xc2 mc2 temp [1,] 0.1 0.04 0.049797615 [2,] 0.2 0.04 0.049161159 [3,] 0.3 0.04 0.048006702 [4,] 0.4 0.04 0.046208311 [5,] 0.5 0.04

I have what is probably a noob question, but.... I am trying to create a 3d plot to illustrate the range of values for the following simple function: A = B*(C/D) B, C, and D are independent variables whose range are equal (e.g. 1 to 3 inclusive) I figure it's not possible to map the surface of A on the 3d space defined by B, C and D but I would like to create a surface defined by the

Hallo! ? I just want to make a 3D plot of a surface of a cone and want to plot some single points around. ? I tried wireframe but cannot find how to plot single points ? I tried scatterplot3d but there the surface is not simple to plot. And: How can I rotate the point of view by the z-axis ? I tried persp3d but how can I add some single points? ? Example: ? library(lattice) library(scatterplot3d)

Hi, Is there a way to plot more than one trend surface using the functions contourplot() and wireframe(). I have found an add=T in contour(), but no equivalent argument in contourplot() and wireframe()? I have taken the example 11-2 (pages 441-451) from Design and analysis of experiments (Montgomery 2001, 5th edition) to see if this could be done in R. I have managed to plot individual

Hi, keine ahnung. Das liegt jetzt bei Hr. Feld. Frag mal bei ihm nach. Gr??e Thushyanthan r-help-request at r-project.org wrote: > Send R-help mailing list submissions to > r-help at r-project.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'

How do I rotate 3D plots/surfaces generated by either cloud or wireframe? Thanks. Marc Marc W. Zodet, MS Health Statistician Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R users, I have a problem in plotting 3 dimensional graph using mixed models. My model is sur_prop ~ afr_c+I(afr_c^2)+I(afr_c^3)+byear_c+I(byear_c^2)+I(byear_c^3)+I(byear_c^4)+(1|Studyparish)+afr_c:byear_c +afr_c:I(byear_c^2)+afr_c:I(byear_c^3)+afr_c:I(byear_c^4)+I(afr_c^2):byear_c+I(afr_c^2):I(byear_c^2)+I(afr_c^2):I(byear_c^3)+I(afr_c^2):I(byear_c^4) This is a study on the effect of

Dear R help, Suppose I have a dataframe with three columns named p, v and C. Here C is a function of both p and v. I can plot the surface C(p,v) using the package lattice using the function wireframe. Now if I have another dataframe - with 2 columns named p_ind and v_ind and pind is a function of v_ind. I would like to overlay the plot of the curve p_ind, v_ind and C(p_ind, v_ind) onto my

Hi. I'm a student at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada. I can't for the life of me figure out how to plot a 3D surface (A 3D response surface to be more specific) in R. I found your email address on a web board, and saw someone mention wireframe(), but using the help in R yielded no results. Any suggestions? Thanks. Dean Vrecko

Good morning gentlemen! I'm not a fan of the lattice due to a large number of procedures what should be done to reach a simple goal, but have confess that in some cases the graphics are way better than the graphics. Some days I have been searching without success as is to add a cut-off point on a graph of response surface. It is interesting that the researcher to look at the graph spotting

Dear Uwe Ligges , I still can't finish it. *> aa* #my data x1 x2 y 5 0.05 6 4.4180 1 0.50 3 2.6979 4 0.50 9 2.9000 7 0.95 6 2.6230 8 0.95 6 2.9078 9 0.95 6 2.6727 3 1.40 3 2.4203 2 1.40 9 2.5329 6 1.85 6 2.4867 *> attach(aa)* *> persp(x1,x2,y* error in persp.default(x1, x2, y) : increasing 'x' and 'y' values expected

--- On Mon, 1/17/11, Raymond Wong <raywong365@yahoo.ca> wrote: From: Raymond Wong <raywong365@yahoo.ca> Subject: Re: [R] help in calculating ar on ranked vector To: "Uwe Ligges" <ligges@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> Received: Monday, January 17, 2011, 11:56 AM Thanks Uwe:   Here is my code. the first set of print statements work, but not the second.   #

Hi all, I'd like to plot the Real and Imaginary parts of some f(z) as two different surfaces in wireframe (the row/column axes are the real and imag axes). I know I can do it by, roughly speaking, something like plotz <- expand.grid(x={range of Re(z)}, y={range of Im(z), groups=1:2) plotz$func<-c(Re(f(z),Im(f(z)) wireframe(func~x*y,data=plotz,groups=groups) But that seems like a

Hi David, ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Smith" <davidsmi at microsoft.com> > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>, "Uwe Ligges" <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>, "Elliot Waingold" > <Elliot.Waingold at microsoft.com> > Cc: "R-devel at r-project.org" <r-devel at r-project.org>

Dear R-experts, my goal is to visualize the following polynomial regression as a 3D-surface: Z = b0 + b1*X + b2*Y + b3*XY + b4*X^2 + b5*Y^2 I believe that a solution to this problem may be of interest to a wider range of scientists because the problem is a derivative of a more general problem, i.e.: how to describe the relationship between one dependent variable and the DIFFERENCE between two