similar to: R2.2.1-patched build failed with PGI 6.1 on x86-64

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "R2.2.1-patched build failed with PGI 6.1 on x86-64"

2006 Mar 10
2
problem building R-patched on x86-64 with PGI 6.1
Dear R-devel, [I'm not sure if this is appropriate for R-devel. If not, I'm more than happy to move it to R-help.] As those of you who saw my post on R-help know, I've been trying to build R-patched on a dual Opteron box running Scyld Beowulf, using the PGI 6.1 compilers. The build went fine, but I couldn't get it to pass make check-all. Jennifer Lai, who reported success with
2007 Nov 26
1
Problem with configure's detection of glob on 2.6.0 (PR#10468)
Full_Name: Mike Pacey Version: 2.6.0 OS: SuSe Linux 9.3 x86_64 Submission from: (NULL) (194.80.32.10) A "vanilla" version of R configures and compiles without a problem on my system. Switching to using the PGI compiler configures correctly (see the values at the bottom fo thismessage), but compilation aborts with: pgcc -I../../src/extra/zlib -I../../src/extra/bzip2
2006 May 11
0
PGI 6.1 compile error
I am trying to compile R-2.3.0 (both first release and patched 2006-05-10) on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 7) using the Portland Group compiler version 6.1 and the notes from Jennifer Lai on p33 of "R Installation and Administration" version 2.3.0 (2006-04-24). I have not used this compiler before, so it is possible things are messed up more than usual, even
2006 May 18
0
R-devel and PGI 6.0 compile error
I am trying to compile R-devel (R-devel_2006-05-17.tar.gz) on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 7) using the Portland Group compiler 6.0. (I have not yet successful compiled R on this configuration, so I don't know if this is a new problem.) I get an error pgcc -L/usr/local/pgi/linux86-64/6.0/libso -L/usr/lib64 -o dftables dftables.o ../dftables chartables.h
2008 Dec 09
1
errors with compilation
Hi, i'm trying to compile R on a Cray XT3 using pgi/7.2.1 - CNL (compute node linux) The R version is 2.8.0 this is the option -enable-R-static-lib=yes --disable-R-shlib CPICFLAGS=fpic FPICFLAGS=fpic CXXPICFLAGS=fpic SHLIB_LDFLAGS=shared --with-x=no SHLIB_CXXLDFLAGS=shared --disable-BLAS-shlib CFLAGS="-g -O2 -Kieee" FFLAGS="-g -O2 -Kieee" CXXFLAGS="-g -O2
2005 Aug 31
1
Build Portland Group Compiler
Hi, I built R with Portland Group compiler, but I noticed one thing that when I ran configure for the first time on AMD machine, I got the following error: checking whether the C compiler works... configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs. If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'. See `config.log' for more details. so I tried to set host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
2005 Aug 23
1
compile R with Portland Group compiler
Hi, Can anyone advise me on how to compile R with Portland Group compiler on a Opeteron machine with Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 installed? I've edit config.site file to pick portland group compilers instead of gcc. Here is the list of modified flags: CC=/usr/pgi/linux86-64/6.0/bin/pgcc CFLAGS='-g -O2' CPPFLAGS='-I/usr/pgi/linux86-64/6.0/include
2005 Sep 06
1
Build R with AMD pgi compiled ACML library
Hi, Has anyone had any luck in using portland group compiler to build R(-devel) with AMD's pgi compiled ACML library? I've downloaded the packages and set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and run configuration script as follow: % ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/R.pgcc --with-blas='-lacml' However, it failed to pick up double complex BLAS, checking for sgemm_ in -lacml... yes checking
2005 Sep 02
0
Build R with ATLAS
Hi, I followed this message, https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2004-February/028942.html, to compile ATLAS with gcc and g77 on AMD Opteron. I then followed the instructions on this message, https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2004-February/028966.html, to convert static libraries to dynamic libraries. However, when I tried to configure R-devel, I got the following error
2008 Oct 30
1
Compiling R Packages
I am working on a SLES 10 cluster with R available on it. To better use my resources, I want to use Rmpi, but I am having a difficult time installing it. I have set the $R_LIBS variable correctly. The MPI libraries are available through the PGI compiler, but this R instance was compiled with GCC. The Rmpi package can be compiled and installed with %R CMD INSTALL Rmpi_0.5-5.tar.gz
2009 Feb 11
1
Problem with R using pgi compiler on x86_64
Hi, we have installed R-2.8.1 using the current pgi compiler (8.0.2) for AMD64 on a SLES9 system. When I try to install "Matrix" everything is fine until the last step. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R.INSTALL.TW3399/Matrix/src/AMD' pgCC -L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -pgf90libs -o Matrix.so CHMfactor.o Csparse.o TMatrix_as.o Tsparse.o init.o Mutils.o chm_common.o
2004 Apr 03
0
problem compiling R-1.9.0beta with PGI compilers on amd6 4
> From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk] > > On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Liaw, Andy wrote: > > > Dear R-devel, > > > > I'm trying to compile R-1.9.0beta (2004-03-31) with the PGI > compilers > > (15-day free evaluation: after the 15 days the binaries > will stop working). > > I'm running into some problems, that I hope some can
2005 Oct 12
0
additional comments on building R with PGI compiler
Hi, I have additional comments on building R with PGI compiler. If one wants to use external BLAS library, then pgf90 instead of pgf77 should be used, and BLAS_LIBS flags should be set. e.g. F77 = $PG_HOME/bin/pgf90 BLAS_LIBS='-L/opt/acml2.7.0/pgi64/ -lacml' # for ACML library BLAS_LIBS='-L/usr/lib64 -lg2c -lblas' # for generic BLAS library that comes
2004 Oct 04
1
compile R-1.9.1 with Portland fortran
Dear R-users, Has any one compiled R-1.9.1 successfully with Portland pgcc pgCC and pgf77? I can not configurate it with ./configure since it told me checking for Fortran name-mangling scheme... configure: error: cannot compile a simple Fortran program Can any one give me some advice. Thank you. My platform: Linux-2.4.26, pentium4, portland compiler 5.1
2005 Dec 23
3
copy contributed packages from R 2.2.0 to 2.2.1
hi R-users, a few days ago R 2.2.1 came out. on my win xp i'installed R 2.2.0. along the time i've installed a lot of contributed packages. my internet-connection is not very fast. so my question: is it possible after installing R 2.2.1 to do copy/paste the contributed packages from the C:\Programme\R221 to the C:\Programme\R2.2.1- location in the files system? or have i to download
2003 Apr 21
1
building R 1.7.0 under RH7.3 (PR#2808)
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---559023410-959030623-1050952576=:23064 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII The configure process does not seem to be working as well as it had for previous versions ...
2008 Apr 07
2
CentOS, Postgres init and puppet
Me again! I have a recipe that looks like: class postgresql { file { pg_hba_conf: name => "/var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf", source => "puppet://puppetmaster/files/workstations/common/var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf", owner => postgres, group => postgres, mode => 600, subscribe => [ Package[postgresql] ],
2006 Jan 17
1
Dynamic load
Hi, I am trying to load a FORTRAN program which I have downloaded from netlib. Counting the number of dependencies, there are about 10 programs which have to be loaded. This is under SunOS 5.9 and R 2.2.1. I have compiled the files with R221 CMD SHLIB *.f. If I load these object files one by one with dyn.load() I get an error like _j4save:reference symbol not found. I have used S-Plus in the
2019 Mar 02
0
Using a different compiler when creating a package on Windows
Hello! I am updating to the R-devel version as of 2/28 and recompiling with OpenBLAS. I got that to compile nicely. I am now updating a package that uses the OpenBLAS and the PGI compiler, which has changed too. I just changed the path names in Makevars. Here is the Makevars file. FC= d:/PGI/win64/18.10/bin/pgf90 F77= d:/PGI/win64/18.10/bin/pgf90 CC = d:/PGI/win64/18.10/bin/pgcc FFLAGS=
2004 Apr 05
0
speed difference between pgf77 and g77 on amd64
For those interested: I compiled R-1.9.0beta_2004-04-02 with pgf77/gcc/g++ and g77/gcc/g++, both _without_ fast BLAS. Both passed make check-all. Simple crossprod(m) for fairly large `m' shows that the version compiled with pgf77 is about 15% faster: [andy@leo:scratch]% echo "set.seed(1); m <- matrix(runif(5e7), 1e4); gc(); system.time(crossprod(m))" | R-1.9.0-PGI/bin/R