similar to: avoiding warning messages on the screen with 'lme'

Dear R users, I'm trying to fit a simple random intercept model with a fixed intercept. Suppose I want to assign a weight w_i to the i-th contribute to the log-likelihood, i.e. w_i * logLik_i where logLik_i is the log-likelihood for the i-th subject. I want to maximize the likelihood for N subjects Sum_i {w_i * logLik_i} Here is a simple example to reproduce

tl;dr anova.lme() claims to provide sums of squares, but it doesn't. And some names are misspelled in ?lme. I can submit all this stuff as a bug report if that's preferred. ?anova.lme says: When only one fitted model object is present, a data frame with the sums of squares, numerator degrees of freedom, denominator degrees of freedom, F-values, and P-values The output of fm1

Dear R users, I have the following code: ---------------------------------------- require(nlme) myfunc <- function(data, n, m, maxIter = 3){ working <- groupedData(formula = y~x|id, data=data) val <- NULL r <- 0 while(r < maxIter){ new.data <- data.frame(x=rnorm(n),y=rnorm(n),id=rep(1:n,each=m)) working <- update(working, data = new.data) # val <- some

When I try to run the example from Variogram with an lme object, I get an error (although summary works): R : Copyright 2005, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.2.1 (2005-12-20 r36812) ISBN 3-900051-07-0 ... > fm1 <- lme(weight ~ Time * Diet, BodyWeight, ~ Time | Rat) Error: couldn't find function "lme" > Variogram(fm1, form = ~ Time | Rat, nint =

Dear R users, I am estimating Poisson mixed models using glmmPQL (MASS) and lmer (lme4). We know that glmmPQL do not provide the correct loglikelihood for such models (it gives the loglike of a 'pseudo' or working linear mixed model). I would like to know how the loglike is calculated by lmer. A minor question is: why do glmmPQL and lmer give different degrees-of-freedom for the same

Dear R developers, One function in my mkin package [1] returns an object that is originally created by nlme(), but contains some additional information. Its class is c("mmkin.nlme", "nlme", "lme"). Now I would like to use the anova() method for lme objects for comparing such S3 objects. Unfortunately, anova.lme currently does not check for inheritance, but

I am using rw0641. In my continuing quest to understand repeated measures analysis, I again return to lme. I exported the Potthoff and Roy data Orthodont.dat from S-PLUS 4.5 to avoid capture errors and ran the examples in the R help. I imported the data.frame with data <- read.table("Orthodont.dat",header=T) attach(data) and created the objects Orthodont.fit1 <-

I am newbie in R, trying to understand and compare syntax in nlme and lme4. lme() model from the nlme package I am interested in is: lme.m1.1 = lme(Y~A+B+C,random=~1|D/E,data=data,method="ML") (for simplicity reason, I am giving generic names of factors) If I understand well, there are three fixed factors: A, B and C, and two random factors: D and E. In addition to that, E is nested in

This question comes up periodically, probably enough to give it a proper thread and maybe point to this thread for reference (similar to the 'conservative anova' thread not too long ago). Moving from lme syntax, which is the function found in the nlme package, to lmer syntax (found in lme4) is not too difficult. It is probably useful to first explain what the differences are between the

Hi I am running some linear and non-linear mixed effect models and would like to do some planned contrasts (a priori contrasts) I have looked in the help and in many forums and it seems possible to do so but don't understand how to write the function and I couldn't find an example in Pinheiro and Bates. lme {nlme} has a contrasts argument but I can't understand how to code it.

Dear all, Edmond Ng (http://multilevel.ioe.ac.uk/softrev/reviewsplus.pdf) provides an example to fit the mixed effects meta-analysis in Splus 6.2. The syntax is: lme(fixed=d~wks, data=meta, random=~1|study, weights=varFixed(~Vofd), control=lmeControl(sigma=1)) where d is the effect size, study is the study number, Vofd is the variance of the effect size and meta is the data frame.

Hello there, I am using the 'nlme' package to analyse among group and in between group variances. I do struggle a little using the respective plot-functions. I created a grouped object: group.lme <- groupedData(obsday ~ oro | id, data=read.table("data-lme.txt", header=T), labels=list(x = "Day of Year", y = "ID number")) When I plot, however

Hi, I am trying to test some contrasts, using glht() in multcomp package on fixed effects in a linear mixed model fitted with lme() in nlme package. The command I used is: ## a simple randomized block design, ## type is fixed effect ## batch is random effect ## model with interaction dat.lme<-lme(info.index~type, random=~1|batch/type, data=dat) glht(dat.lme, linfct = mcp(type

Running the Chapter 4 examples in Pinheiro & Bates' "Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS" (2000), I get a message that the default optimizer doesn't converge, but using "optim" for the optimizer results in convergence: > > library(nlme) > > fm1IGF.lis <- lmList(IGF) > > fm1IGF.lme <- lme(fm1IGF.lis) > Error in lme.formula(fixed =

Dear R-help list readers, I am fitting mixed models with the lme function of the nlme package. If I get convergence depends on how the method (ML/REM) and which (and how much) parameters will depend randomly on the cluster-variable. How get the bist fit without convergence? I set the parameters msVerbose and returnObject to TRUE: lmeControl(maxIter=50000, msMaxIter=200, tolerance=1e-4,

I am using R 2.7.0 on a linux platform. I am trying to reproduce a 2002 example using lme from the nlme library. I want to change the otimizer from the default (nlminb) to optim. Specifically, this is what I am trying to do: R> library(nlme) R> library(car) # for data only R> data(Blackmoor) # from car R> Blackmoor$log.exercise <- log(Blackmoor$exercise + 5/60, 2) R>

Hello all! R2.0.1, W2k I posted this question to the list last Sunday without getting any replies on the list. I got two off the list though, suggesting me to plot "manually" as a second step, from estimable() or intervals() objects respectively. As this was not really what I wished for, I take the risk to upset somebody with a trivial question, and re-post it (just a little

I am trying to do Tukey HSD comparisons on a repeated measures expt. I found the following example on r-help and quoted approvingly elsewhere. It is broken. Can anyone please tell me how to get it to work? I am using R 2.4.1. > require(MASS) ## for oats data set > require(nlme) ## for lme() > require(multcomp) ## for multiple comparison stuff > Aov.mod <- aov(Y ~ N + V +

Dear members, I would like to switch from nlme to lme4 and try to translate some of my models that worked fine with lme. I have problems with the pdMat classes. Below a toy dataset with a fixed effect F and a random effect R. I gave also 2 similar lme models. The one containing pdLogChol (lme1) is easy to translate (as it is an explicit notation of the default model) The more parsimonious

Dear people, A somewhat clueless question follows: I just discovered that the lme function in contrib package nlme for R, while similar to the lme function in Splus, does not use the cluster function option. This difference does not appear to be documented in the V&R `R Complements' file. I have data which is divided into 6 groups The lme model is of the form (simplified from the actual