similar to: xlispstat and R

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "xlispstat and R"

2006 Apr 18
1
Embedding, core dumps, etc.
Well, nothing has changed in the issues that I brought up earlier, except that I can confirm core dumps in non-threaded lisps as well (CLISP), using svn version 37840 (this morning, Seattle time) for R-2-3-patches. I've not tried Thomas' suggested fixes, as I'm hesistant to go down the road of fixing R in such a way that would require constant patching. (so for those counting,
2013 Oct 30
1
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC
With regard to Bartlett-style collectors, they are also used in CMUCL/SBCL, OpenDylan, and various products based on Ravenbrook's Memory Pool System. Also, while Mono doesn't use a Bartlett-style collector, it does support pinning objects referenced from ambiguous stack roots, in an otherwise copying collector. While ITA has expressed concerns with SBCL's GC, they seem to involve the
2006 Jan 17
1
off topic: how is xlispstat used in the industry?
I am sorry for this off-topic question. Just curious how xlispstat is used in the industry and what's it strengthen compared with other computing languages such as R or matlab? Thanks a lot. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2008 May 07
0
Ross Ihaka's reflections on Common Lisp and R
I came across a quite interesting post from Ross Ihaka, thought would be good to share it and get the opinion of folks around here. I am not sure where to post this for the R community but since it has to do with development I thought or R-devel Ross Ihaka Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp From: Ross Ihaka <ih... at stat.auckland.ac.nz> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:35:26 +1300 Local: Tues, Jan 22
2003 Nov 19
1
Installing RXlisp
Dear R users, I was trying to install the package RXLisp by Duncan Temple Lang on a MDK 9.1 Linux machine running R 1.8.0 installed from a RPM. Unfortunately I had a problem loading the shared library into R. Since I'm a Linux newbie I was not able to solve the problem. Maybe some of you can help me. First of all I downloaded the source archive for Xlisp-Stat and for the RXlisp package.
2002 Aug 18
1
LispStat, R and ViSta [was: Re: Status?]
I have been taking a break for the last month or so, and am only just now catching up on my email. Otherwise, I would have joined this discussion earlier. And... I apologize for the length of this, but I don't think it is overly long. >From the amount of activity in the LispStat news group (none), it seems that LispStat is dead. We all know that Luke is working on R and not on LispStat,
2003 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] languages, semantic trees, LLVM interfaces
Hello Vikram, Saturday, September 6, 2003, 9:10:45 PM, you wrote: VSA> For any language with relatively sophisticated syntax and semantic VSA> rules, you will probably need a higher-level representation like an VSA> Abstract Syntax Tree in order to do type-checking and other kinds of VSA> checking. OK, concerning AST -- I see. Thank you. VSA> For OCAML, for example, the
2011 Nov 13
2
kernel messages: alignment check: 0000 [#1] SMP
Hi, This is just to report about the "alignment check: 0000 [#1] SMP" kernel messages in one of my build system (domU) running Scientific Linux 6.1. I am compiling/rpm package for sbcl (http://sbcl.sourceforge.net/) in my build system (domU) and hit the following kernel messages although the domU in question still running and compilation still in progress. I have done some searching
2019 Jul 24
2
Altering the return address , for a function with multiple return paths
On 7/23/19 8:42 PM, John McCall via llvm-dev wrote: > > On 21 Jul 2019, at 12:29, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > > Yes, indeed! > > The SBCL lisp compiler (not llvm based) used to emit functions > which would > return either via ret to the usual instruction after the call, or > else load > the return-address from the stack, then jump 2
2019 Jul 21
2
Altering the return address , for a function with multiple return paths
Yes, indeed! The SBCL lisp compiler (not llvm based) used to emit functions which would return either via ret to the usual instruction after the call, or else load the return-address from the stack, then jump 2 bytes later (which would skip over either a nop or a short jmp at original target location). Which one it used depended upon whether the function was doing a multi-valued return (in which
2000 Feb 07
0
R-0.99.0 available from rsync.r-project.org
rsync.r-project.org has been updated to serve the sources for R-0.99.0. There are three versions of the R CVS source tree available for anonymous rsync. $ rsync rsync.r-project.org:: r-release R sources (feature-frozen version) CVS tree (approx 12 MB) r-release-patched patched R sources (feature-frozen version) CVS tree (approx 12 MB) r-devel R sources (development version) CVS
1999 Dec 02
0
rsync.r-project.org has been updated
rsync.r-project.org now offers three flavors of the R sources. $ rsync rsync.r-project.org:: r-release R sources (feature-frozen version) CVS tree (approx 10 MB) r-release-patched patched R sources (feature-frozen version) CVS tree (approx 10 MB) r-devel R sources (development version) CVS tree (approx 10 MB) xlispstat xlispstat sources (development version) CVS tree
1999 Jun 24
0
Re: [Venables-course] Downloading R
"Hodgess, Erin" <HodgessE at zeus.dt.uh.edu> writes: > Hello all! Good to hear from you again, Erin. > I would like to download R to the UNIX machine here. > > I will be downloading it to my own account. > > Could anyone please tell me how much space it requires once it is > "unzipped"? The original tree is about 8.5 MB. After compilation you
2003 Apr 16
0
R-1.7.0 sources now available through rsync
Sources for R-1.7.0 are now available through rsync to rsync.r-project.org. $ rsync rsync.r-project.org:: r-release R-1.7.0 sources (current released version - approx 30 MB) r-patched R sources (patched released version - approx 30 MB) r-devel R sources (development version) r-manuals Development sources for manuals for R r-recommended Sources for recommended R
2003 Apr 16
0
R-1.7.0 sources now available through rsync
Sources for R-1.7.0 are now available through rsync to rsync.r-project.org. $ rsync rsync.r-project.org:: r-release R-1.7.0 sources (current released version - approx 30 MB) r-patched R sources (patched released version - approx 30 MB) r-devel R sources (development version) r-manuals Development sources for manuals for R r-recommended Sources for recommended R
2005 Apr 18
0
ESS 5.2.7 released
Dear ESS users, {BCC'ed to RPM and Debian maintainers of ESS} We have now released ESS 5.2.7. This is a bug fix release against 5.2.6 where - the new UTF-8 "support" gave problems for Xemacs, and - accidentally, 'auto-fill-mode' was activated for *.R buffers with a few new features, see "New Features" below , notably some extended Sweave supported,
2003 Feb 24
5
exact range of axes in plots
Hello. I was wondering how one can find the exact values of the range of an axis within a plot. In xlispstat it was (send plot :range 0). Thanks much, Jason
2003 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] languages, semantic trees, LLVM interfaces
> VSA> For OCAML, for example, the front-end is quite sophisticated > VSA> and complex and the LLVM representation would not be suitable for > VSA> supporting all the checking and translation. > > But I have just meant ocamlyacc, i.e. ocaml clone of the yacc. > And here my question was: what kind of interface is expected to use > from within ocml, CommonLisp
2008 Feb 05
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 garbage collector questions
thomas weidner wrote: > Hello, > > i want to implement a common lisp subset using llvm for fun. Out of curiousity, for which CL implementation is this targeted? sbcl? Or something you're rolling? The reason why I ask is that I expressed an outrageous opinion at Supercomputing back in November, to wit, that CL is probably the best language suited for today's multicore
2005 Jan 30
2
Patch : fix configure.in and Makefile.am problems.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:45:05 -0800 (PST) Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > OK, thanks, checked in. once linux-ppc is ironed out the > release should be ready to go. Long way to go yet. Mine is a G3 PowerPC so it doesn't have Altivec. I've tried --disable-assembler but there's still something screwed up int the Makefile.am. Erik --