similar to: Multiple comparison and two-way ANOVA design

Hi, I am seeking help with an error when running the example from R Documentation for TukeyHSD. The error occurs with any example I run, from any text book or website. thank you... > plot(TukeyHSD(fm1, "tension")). Error in plot(confint(as.glht(x)), ylim = c(0.5, n.contrasts + 0.5), ...) : error in evaluating the argument 'x' in selecting a method for function

hi list, i have to ask you again, having tried and searched for several days... i want to do a TukeyHSD after an Anova, and want to get the adjusted p-values after the Tukey Correction. i found the p.adjust function, but it can only correct for "holm", "hochberg", bonferroni", but not "Tukey". Is it not possbile to get adjusted p-values after

Hi all!

I am having trouble plotting one of my graphs (think graph theory graph with edges and vertices, not scatterplots or histograms). For some pairs of vertices, I want multiple edges to be visible in my graph. As an example of this, in my script below, I want two edges to be visible from vertex 1 and vertex 9 (among some others) yet when I plot it, only one edge is visible.

Dear R-developeRs, Attached follows a patch against svn 34959 that adds the printing of p-values to the TukeyHSD.aov function in stats package. I also updated the corresponding documentation file and added a 'see also' reference to the simint function of the multcomp package. As it was already brought up in a previous thread [1] in R-help, one can obtain the adjusted

Why do I see this error? > library(stats) > require(stats) [1] TRUE > > tHSD <- TukeyHSD(aov) Error in TukeyHSD(aov) : no applicable method for "TukeyHSD" In case it helps: > aov Call: aov(formula = roi ~ (Cue * Hemisphere) + Error(Subject/(Cue * Hemisphere)), data = roiDataframe) Grand Mean: 8.195069 Stratum 1: Subject Terms: Residuals Sum

Hey, I have this TukeyHSD output from which I would like to extract only the P-values (p adj, last number). The problem is that the test output is a character list. How can I "break" this sentence to separate the Pv? Tukey multiple comparisons of means 95% family-wise confidence level Fit: aov(formula = Fe1$Fe ~ Fe1$genotype) $`Fe1$genotype` diff lwr upr

I'm interested in restricting the pairwise comparisons of interaction effects in a multi-way factorial ANOVA, because I find comparisons of interactions between all different variables different to interpret. For example (supposing a p<0.10 cutoff just to be able to use this example): > summary(fm1 <- aov(breaks ~ wool*tension, data = warpbreaks)) Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F

Hi, 1) I have noticed that when I use the aggregate function it outputs numbers in the results. for example: aggregate by product group.1 Aggregate 1 ProductA 1000400.00 2 ProductB 23232323.00 3 Missing 232323.00 is there a way to suppress the numbers infront of aggregate outputs. I checked and they don't look like columns when I do a summary so I can't -1

Dear all, I want to aggregate() my data based of the classes of a factors, just as in the help file, but how do I define the "Region varable" in the ?aggregate example? Now, the column is just like any other in my data matrix. As I understand it from ?(state), state contains a matrix with the columns Pop, Income etc., but Region is somehow separated. I noted below that as.list() is

Warranty on Accuracy, Precision, Legality, ... of R in Research (These questions may well have been raised.) What is the implied warranty of using R for research & publications, consulting, etc.? Alternately, how does one obtain such a warranty? Your answers will be much appreciated. Perhaps you can point me to some websites which discussed this subject in the past. Thanks & regards