similar to: "Survey" package and NAMCS data... unsure of specification

The National Ambulatory and Medical Care Survey is a free data set from the CDC that I'd like to analyze using the "Survey" package in R. Before I dive in, though, it occurred to me that someone may already have gone to the trouble of writing code that will bring in the data and assign the variable names and value labels. This is a big file, so doing it from scratch will take

Hi everyone, my apologies in advance if I'm overlooking something simple in this question. I am trying to use R's survey package to make a direct method age-adjustment to some complex survey data. I have played with postStratify, calibrate, rake, and simply multiplying the base weights by the correct proportions - nothing seems to hit the published numbers on the nose. I am trying to

Hi: I have usually used the GROWTH() excel function to do this but now want to see if I can do this with R. I want to predict values into the future, possibly with the predict.arima Function. I have the following weekly fish weight averages: weight <- c("2.1","2.4","2.8","3.6","4.1","5.2","6.3") week <-

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:52 AM, Raja, Dr. Edwin Amalraj <amalraj.raja at abdn.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi , > > library(foreign) > write.dta(data1, "data1.dta") > > should work. I don't think so: > library(foreign) > example(svydesign) > write.dta(dstrat, "~/Downloads/foo.dta") Error in write.dta(dstrat, "~/Downloads/foo.dta") : The

Hi everyone, apologies if the answer to this is in an obvious place. I've been searching for about a day and haven't found anything.. I'm trying to replicate Stata's confidence intervals in R with the survey package, and the numbers are very very close but not exact. My ultimate goal is to replicate Berkeley's SDA website with R (http://sda.berkeley.edu/), which seems to

Hello everyone, I am trying to fit the following model All X. variables are continuous, while the conditions are categoricals. model <- lm(X2

Hello, I'm estimating an ordered logit model on a probability weighted survey sample. polr permits case weights with the "weights" option, but I cannot figure out from existing documentation what it actually does with these weights. I'm concerned about this because I get somewhat different results using Stata's ologit command with the pweights option and very

Dear experts: Is it possible to create a new function based on stats:::model.matrix.default so that an alternative factor coding is used when the function is called instead of the default factor coding? Basically, I'd like to reproduce the results in 'mat' below, without having to explicitly specify my desired factor coding (identity matrices) in the 'contrasts.arg'. dd

Dear all, I have tried to modify the code of MASS:::stepAIC.default(), dropterm() and addterm() to use AICc instead of AIC for model selection. The code is appended below. Somehow the calculations are still not correct and I would be grateful if anyone could have a look at what might be wrong with this code... Here is a working example: ## require(nlme) model1=lme(distance ~ age + Sex, data =

Is anyone familiar with a way to account for sampling weights (e.g., in order to cope with selection bias) for individual respondents using the bayesm package (e.g., rhierMnlRwMixture)? In the regular MNL this can easily be done in STATA using the mlogit function with pweights option. However, I am unfamiliar with a way to do it in HB estimation. Any help or hints are appreciated. Best, Klaus

optim ignores misspelled control parameters, so that trying to set (e.g.) "maxint=1000" in the control argument silently does nothing. The patch below (watch out for line breaks! also posted at http://www.zoo.ufl.edu/bolker/optim_patch.R , and http://www.zoo.ufl.edu/bolker/optim_new.R) adds three lines to optim.R that issue a warning if any names of elements of "control" fail

Version 3.9 of the survey package is now on CRAN. Since the last announcement (version 3.6-11, about a year ago) the main changes are - Database-backed survey objects: the data can live in a SQLite (or other DBI-compatible) database and be loaded as needed. - Ordinal logistic regression - Support for the 'mitools' package and multiply-imputed data - Conditioning plots,

Version 3.9 of the survey package is now on CRAN. Since the last announcement (version 3.6-11, about a year ago) the main changes are - Database-backed survey objects: the data can live in a SQLite (or other DBI-compatible) database and be loaded as needed. - Ordinal logistic regression - Support for the 'mitools' package and multiply-imputed data - Conditioning plots,