similar to: using integrate with optimize nested in the integration

Hello Everyone, I'm currently learning about quantile regressions. I've been using an optimizer to compare with the rq() command for quantile regression. When I run the code, the results show that my coefficients are consistent with rq(), but the intercept term can vary by a lot. I don't think my optimizer code is wrong and suspects it has something to do with the starting

Hi! I'm trying to install package Bhat on a Win machine, had a problem and figured out a fix, but would like to report the problem and make sure the fix is correct. This is what I do: 1. Download Bhat_0.9-07.tar.gz 2. Uncompress it and compress it back to Bhat_0.9-07.zip 3. Install from the R windows gui (that apparentely requires the zip compression and cannot deal with the tar.gz) But

I just ran example(glm) and happened to notice that models based on the Gamma distribution gives a t test, while the Poisson models give a z test. Why? Both are b/s.e., aren't they? I can't find documentation supporting the claim that the distribution is more like t in one case than another, except in the Gaussian case (where it really is t). Aren't all of the others approximations

xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because xen_play_dead() is invoked in the cpu down path, whereas cpu_bringup() (as the name suggests) is useful in the cpu bringup path. Getting rid of xen_play_dead()'s dependency on cpu_bringup() helps in hooking on to the generic SMP booting framework. Also remove the extra call to preempt_enable() added by commit 41bd956 (xen/smp: Fix

xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because xen_play_dead() is invoked in the cpu down path, whereas cpu_bringup() (as the name suggests) is useful in the cpu bringup path. Getting rid of xen_play_dead()'s dependency on cpu_bringup() helps in hooking on to the generic SMP booting framework. Also remove the extra call to preempt_enable() added by commit 41bd956 (xen/smp: Fix

I see. Is there a pre-existing way to do this in LLVM? Cheers, ~Siddharth. On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 02:12 Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > ConstantExprs are immutable, they can't be changed once they are created. > And a ConstantExpr can reference other ConstantExprs. So replacing all uses > of a Value in a ConstantExpr would require creating a new immutable

Where can I download Bhat package? I need to use plkhci function in this package, which estimates confidence interval using likelihood ratio. Thanks. Hongsheng (Hank) Liao, PhD. Lab Manager Center for Quantitative Fisheries Ecology Old Dominion University 757-683-4571 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Whoops, sorry, I meant "value->replaceAllUsesWith". Should I create a new post with an updated title? Thanks Siddharth On Thu 17 Aug, 2017, 01:05 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 August 2017 at 15:39, (IIIT) Siddharth Bhat via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > From what I have observed, using

Hi All, I'm trying to understand BB Vectorizer and gone through http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-04-12/Slides/Hal_Finkel.pdf Wanted to know how to use bb-vectorize-debug-candidate-selection and bb-vectorize-debug-pair-selection command arguments. I tried the command with debug build clang - clang -O2 test.c -mllvm -vectorize \ -mllvm -debug-only=bb-vectorize \ -mllvm

Hi All, I was going through http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalized_loop and some other documents on Normalized Loops. LLVM currently doesn't seem to normalize the loop as mentioned in the link (i.e. to start with 0 and have a unit step). I wrote a pass to convert a loop into normalized form as in the link (i.e. to have start value of 0 and step of 1 whenever possible) but I'm not sure

Hi, I am fitting a weighted least square regression and trying to compute SSE,SST and SSReg but I am not getting SST = SSReg + SSE and I dont know what I am coding wrong. Can you help please? xnam <-colnames(X) # colnames Design Matrix fmla1 <- as.formula(paste("Y ~",paste(xnam, collapse=

What would the "correct form of GEP be"? Thanks, Siddharth On Fri 11 Aug, 2017, 23:47 Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev, < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 8/11/2017 3:40 PM, Siddharth Bhat via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > This is a general question regarding type conversion: > > > > from: <ty>** > > to: [<size> x <ty>]* >

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Karthik Bhat <karthikthecool at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > I think it might not be exactly PR13303 which might be causing the > corruption of struct when accessed through GDB. > This seems to be an ABI problem in clang. > The problem seems to be that when we have pass by value of struct > (having indirect arguments) stack is not

Hi David, I think it might not be exactly PR13303 which might be causing the corruption of struct when accessed through GDB. This seems to be an ABI problem in clang. The problem seems to be that when we have pass by value of struct (having indirect arguments) stack is not aligned properly. I tried realigning the stack for indirect arguments in(TargetInfo.cpp) - ABIArgInfo

Hi Relph, I'm trying to print the value of 'a' while executing a.s = --depth; I have used break line number instead of break function so that the initial prologue part gets executed. The problem seems to be happening when parameters are pushed into stack and we call a function recursively. For example in the code when we have a int s; inside the struct instead of short s; gdb is able

Hi, We have the SAMBA server installed for UNIX box. (SWAT having 2 daemons - smbd and nmbd) So user can access the UNIX directories through Windows NT. While copying any of the files from WINDOWS NT explorer to NFS shared directory, the modify date/time automatically becomes the current date/time, irrespective of the original file's modify date/time. How do I retain this modify

Dear R Developers, the following CRAN packages do not cleanly pass R CMD check for quite some time now and did not have any updates since the time given. Several attempts by the CRAN admins to contact the package maintainers had no success. norm, 1.0-9, 2002-05-07, WARN sound, 0.6, 2002-08-31, WARN Bhat, 0.9-07, 2003-11-04, WARN HI, 0.1, 2003-11-04, WARN mmlcr, 1.3.2, 2003-11-15, WARN mvnmle,

I have noticed a definite loss of numerical precision going from 1.1.1 to 1.2.x under both Windows 98 and NT4 on x86 architecture. I noticed the difference when using the abcnon() function in the bootstrap package, but I think you could see the problem in any routine that involves subtracting relatively large numbers from each other. For the case I am looking at (see code below), the abcnon

On 05/30/2018 06:04 AM, Siddharth Bhat via llvm-dev wrote: > You can run SCEV which will see through bitcasts and GEPs, so it > should give an expression of the form (base + offset) on the pointer > of the load. Specifically, you can use ScalarEvolution to subtract the expression for the base descriptor from the expression for the loaded pointer and see if the result is a SCEVConstant.

This seems to be another case of PR13303 - since GDB can't figure out where to break for this function based on the debug info (you'll notice when you "break recurse" that it's not breaking on a line or source file, just an address) it's breaking at the very start, before the prologue I'm about to commit a fix to this. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Karthik Bhat