similar to: random interactions in lme

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "random interactions in lme"

2024 Oct 31
16
[PATCH v3 00/15] NVKM GSP RPC kernel docs, cleanups and fixes
Hi folks: Here is the leftover of the previous spin of NVKM GSP RPC fixes, which is handling the return of large GSP message. PATCH 1 and 2 in the previous spin were merged [1], and this spin is based on top of PATCH 1 and PATCH 2 in the previous spin. Besides the support of the large GSP message, kernel doc and many cleanups are introduced according to the comments in the previous spin [2].
2024 Dec 11
1
[PATCH v3 02/15] nvkm: rename "repc" to "gsp_rpc_len" on the GSP message recv path
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:52:37AM -0700, Zhi Wang wrote: > The name "repc" has different meanings in different contexts. > > To improve the readability, it's better to refine it to a name that > reflects what it actually represents. > > Rename "repc" to "gsp_rpc_len" in the GSP message recv path. Add an > section in the doc to explain the
2023 Dec 22
11
nouveau GSP fixes
This is a collection of nouveau debug prints, memory leak, a very annoying race condition causing system hangs with prime scenarios, and a fix from Lyude to get the panel on my laptop working. I'd like to get these into 6.7, Dave.
2023 Dec 04
1
[PATCH] nouveau/gsp: add three notifier callbacks that we see in normal operation
These seem to get called, but it doesn't look like we have to care too much at this point. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c index
2023 Dec 04
1
[PATCH] nouveau/gsp: add three notifier callbacks that we see in normal operation
On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 08:55 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > +static int > +r535_gsp_msg_ucode_libos_print(void *priv, u32 fn, void *repv, u32 repc) > +{ > +???????/* work out what we should do here. */ > +???????return 0; > +} This is part of my logrm debugfs patch. ?It contains the printf log from a PMU exception. Do you want me to research the other two RPCs and tell you exactly
2024 Dec 11
1
[PATCH -next] drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: Modify mismatched function name
No functional modification involved. drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:2174: warning: expecting prototype for create_debufgs(). Prototype was for create_debugfs() instead. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci at linux.alibaba.com> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=12292 Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong at linux.alibaba.com> ---
2024 Jun 18
1
[PATCH 2/2] [v5] drm/nouveau: expose GSP-RM logging buffers via debugfs
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 21:54 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: Hi Timur, thanks for the follow-up on this patch series. On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 06:52:53PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: The LOGINIT, LOGINTR, LOGRM, and LOGPMU buffers are circular buffers that have printf-like logs from GSP-RM and PMU encoded in them. LOGINIT, LOGINTR, and LOGRM are allocated by Nouveau and their DMA addresses are
2024 Feb 22
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: use dedicated wq for fence uevents work
Using the kernel global workqueue to signal fences can lead to unexpected deadlocks. Some other work (e.g. from a different driver) could directly or indirectly depend on this fence to be signaled. However, if the WQ_MAX_ACTIVE limit is reached by waiters, this can prevent the work signaling the fence from running. While this seems fairly unlikely, it's potentially exploitable. Fixes:
2024 Feb 23
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: use dedicated wq for fence uevents work
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:14:53AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 00:45, Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Using the kernel global workqueue to signal fences can lead to > > unexpected deadlocks. Some other work (e.g. from a different driver) > > could directly or indirectly depend on this fence to be signaled. > >
2024 Jun 12
2
[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object
Store the struct device pointer used to allocate the DMA buffer in the nvkm_gsp_mem object. This allows nvkm_gsp_mem_dtor() to release the buffer without needing the nvkm_gsp. This is needed so that we can retain DMA buffers even after the nvkm_gsp object is deleted. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> --- v2: rebased to drm-misc-next
2024 Aug 02
1
[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object
Store the struct device pointer used to allocate the DMA buffer in the nvkm_gsp_mem object. This allows nvkm_gsp_mem_dtor() to release the buffer without needing the nvkm_gsp. This is needed so that we can retain DMA buffers even after the nvkm_gsp object is deleted. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> --- Notes: v2: added get/put_device calls
2024 Jan 23
1
[PATCH] nouveau: rip out fence irq allow/block sequences.
From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> fences are signalled on nvidia hw using non-stall interrupts. non-stall interrupts are not latched from my reading. When nouveau emits a fence, it requests a NON_STALL signalling, but it only calls the interface to allow the non-stall irq to happen after it has already emitted the fence. A recent change eacabb546271 ("nouveau: push event
2024 Jul 29
2
[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object
Store the struct device pointer used to allocate the DMA buffer in the nvkm_gsp_mem object. This allows nvkm_gsp_mem_dtor() to release the buffer without needing the nvkm_gsp. This is needed so that we can retain DMA buffers even after the nvkm_gsp object is deleted. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> v2: added get/put_device calls ---
2024 Jan 25
1
[PATCH] nouveau: rip out fence irq allow/block sequences.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 05:25:38PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> > > fences are signalled on nvidia hw using non-stall interrupts. > > non-stall interrupts are not latched from my reading. > > When nouveau emits a fence, it requests a NON_STALL signalling, > but it only calls the interface to allow the non-stall irq to happen
2024 Sep 10
1
[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object
Store the struct device pointer used to allocate the DMA buffer in the nvkm_gsp_mem object. This allows nvkm_gsp_mem_dtor() to release the buffer without needing the nvkm_gsp. This is needed so that we can retain DMA buffers even after the nvkm_gsp object is deleted. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h | 1 +
2024 Oct 30
2
[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object
Store the struct device pointer used to allocate the DMA buffer in the nvkm_gsp_mem object. This allows nvkm_gsp_mem_dtor() to release the buffer without needing the nvkm_gsp. This is needed so that we can retain DMA buffers even after the nvkm_gsp object is deleted. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h | 1 +
2024 Jul 29
1
[PATCH 2/2] [v6] drm/nouveau: expose GSP-RM logging buffers via debugfs
The LOGINIT, LOGINTR, LOGRM, and LOGPMU buffers are circular buffers that have printf-like logs from GSP-RM and PMU encoded in them. LOGINIT, LOGINTR, and LOGRM are allocated by Nouveau and their DMA addresses are passed to GSP-RM during initialization. The buffers are required for GSP-RM to initialize properly. LOGPMU is also allocated by Nouveau, but its contents are updated when Nouveau
2024 Oct 30
2
[PATCH 2/2] [v9] drm/nouveau: expose GSP-RM logging buffers via debugfs
The LOGINIT, LOGINTR, LOGRM, and LOGPMU buffers are circular buffers that have printf-like logs from GSP-RM and PMU encoded in them. LOGINIT, LOGINTR, and LOGRM are allocated by Nouveau and their DMA addresses are passed to GSP-RM during initialization. The buffers are required for GSP-RM to initialize properly. LOGPMU is also allocated by Nouveau, but its contents are updated when Nouveau
2005 Oct 25
1
Confidence Intervals for Mixed Effects
I'm fairly new to R and am wondering if anybody knows of R code to calculate confidence intervals for parameters (fixed effects and variance components) from mixed effects models based on Sattherthwaite's method? I'm also interested in Satterthwaite-based confidence intervals for linear combinations (mostly sums) of various variance components. [[alternative HTML version
2024 Nov 11
4
[PATCH 1/2] nouveau: handle EBUSY and EAGAIN for GSP aux errors.
From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> The upper layer transfer functions expect EBUSY as a return for when retries should be done. Fix the AUX error translation, but also check for both errors in a few places. Fixes: eb284f4b3781 ("drm/nouveau/dp: Honor GSP link training retry timeouts") Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> ---