similar to: Beginner in R

Hi, The source attached at the bottom is a testcase which causes a back-end error in LLVM 2.4. These types of assembly routines are mainly used in OS kernels. I checked that GCC 4.3 works for this routine. The error messsage is ... Couldn't allocate output reg for constraint 'A'! I just need help or comments so that I could analyze and fix this bug. My

http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#How-can-I-set-components-of-a-list-to-NULL_003f The explanation on this FAQ entry is not clear. It says '... similarly for named components...'. What I understood was x[i]<-list(NULL) is the same as x$a_name<-list(NULL). But, they are not. As the example below shows, x$a_name<-list(NULL) is the same as x[[i]]<-list(NULL). >

Hi, I'm pretty new to R. I have an object (say a list) and I I have a function that I call on various columns in that list (excuse terminology if it's wrong/ambiguous). Imagine its like this (actual values are unimportant) and called mylist: >mylist A B 1 5 2 5 3 6 4 8 5 0 I have a function: foo = function(param){ #modify list A or B values depending on

Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote on 16.03.2015 17:56:20: > If you want to do it at a clang level, the right thing to do is to > fixup the ABI lowerings for pointers to keep them pointers in this case. > So this is an artifact of the way that we pass structures, and > constructing a general solution at the ABI level might be tricky. > I've cc'd Uli, who did most

Hi, I have the following C loop to vectorize: struct box { double* source; }; void test(double* restrict result, struct box my_struct, int len) { for (int i=0 ; i<len; i++) { result[i] = my_struct.source[i] * my_struct.source[i]; } } There are two references in the loop, result[i] (restrict) and my_struct.source[i] (readonly). The compiler should easily figure out that

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:34 PM Olivier Sallenave <ol.sall at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for your feedback. I would prefer not to write a new AA. Can't we > directly implement that traversal in BasicAA? > Can I ask why? Outside of the "well, it's another pass", i mean? BasicAA is stateless, so you can't cache, and you really don't

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:54 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:39 PM Olivier H Sallenave <ohsallen at us.ibm.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have the following C loop to vectorize: >> >> struct box { >> double* source; >> }; >> >> void test(double* restrict result, struct box

Hi, I am trying to figure out how to read arguments of a call instruction. I had few questions based on that I have the following C Code 1 #include <stdio.h> 2 3 struct my_struct 4 { 5 int a; 6 int b; 7 }; 8 9 struct my_struct abc; 10 void p_ptr ( unsigned long j) 11 { 12 printf ( "%lx \n", j ); 13 } 14 15 void struct_ptr ( struct my_struct *

> How did you do it without the pragma? I understood that the problem was a mismatch between the the declaration and definition in for some codebooks (exc_*_tables.c). > I saw you added the pragmas to disable the float/double warnings to misc.h > though that header isn't included by the files that generate the warnings. What are the offending files then? BTW, aside from the

I'm having trouble getting my backend to properly treat the situation where a char* is converted into a struct, i.e. something like: char* pointer_representation = ...; MyStruct* my_struct = (MyStruct*) pointer_representation; my_struct->an_int_field = 5; When this occurs, LLVM seems to fold the struct and char* into one assembly 'object', which is perfectly fine. However, it also

Hi Shankha, > 24 p_ptr ((unsigned long)&abc); > call void @p_ptr(i64 ptrtoint (%struct.my_struct* @abc to i64)) > nounwind, !dbg !31 > > Q.1 At line no 24 I try to read the address of global variable abc. > The address is type casted > from struct * to int * for which ptrtoint. I guess you mean "is type casted from struct * to unsigned

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Stephen McGruer <stephen.mcgruer at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm having trouble getting my backend to properly treat the situation where > a char* is converted into a struct, i.e. something like: > > char* pointer_representation = ...; > MyStruct* my_struct = (MyStruct*) pointer_representation; > my_struct->an_int_field = 5; > >

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dmitry Frank <dimon.frank at gmail.com> Date: 2012/11/28 Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] clang code-completion question To: Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> Cc: "cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Developers" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu> Hello, Nick! Thank you for your reply. Regarding to pointers to functions: look at this code: static void

Hi Duncan, Thanks for pointing out my mistake. I will reword my questions. //C code int var1; //global int a, b; foo(a, b); bar(c); generates following //LLVM IR %1 = load a; %2 = load b; call foo(%1, %2) call bar(@var1) CallInst.getOperand(1).getNameStr() on foo, returns null, but on bar returns var1. Similarly, for call void @p_ptr(i64 ptrtoint (%struct.my_struct* @abc to i64)) nounwind,

Dear developers, First of all, thank you for your job on clang, now I use clang as autocompletion tool with my Vim, and it seems to work awesome. But I have some questions: 1) Is it possible to make clang to complete pointers to functions as a functions? I mean, I want to get function prototype, with returning value type and all the parameters. 2) Is it possible to make completion work inside

If you could point me towards the correct location in the standard I would appreciate that - I didn't realize it wasn't acceptable to turn pointer-data to structs. My example is reduced from the EEMBC benchmarks where I ran into the problem, so I may have reduced it too far by accident (but I'm fairly sure they do not use __attribute__ or similar). Adding a

Hello, All. First, I want to thank Ian Malone and Ralph Giles, thanks for your kind replies. But I still have problems about seek. As you suggested, I could use ov_open_callbacks() to supply my own read/write/seek functions. So, can you give me an example? I?m sorry for my ignorance, because I haven?t used callbacks before. I analyzed the vorbisfile.c in Tremor, and I think I

I am trying to call a precompiled C function that uses a struct as one of it's arguments. I could write a wrapper function in C, but I was hoping there is some way to pack fields into an array of type raw that could be passed directly to the function. Here is some more detail. The C struct is simple, but has mixed types: struct STRUCT1 { long type; long nx; double

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!-- #msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:

Two models: class Project << ActiveRecord::Base has_many :files end class File << ActiveRecord::Base has_one :project acts_as_tree end Inside of the project model, when creating a new product, I want to store the hierarchy of files within it. If I do, my_top_level_file = my_project_object.files.create(:file_name => ''foo'');