similar to: Habituation model : several sequences in several sessions, should I use getGroups?

Dear all, I am looking at habituation of dogs trotting on a treadmill. I record the ground reaction force and I analyze it with several discrete variables (maximum, minimum,...) For each variable, I get between 40 and 50 data per sample. I record data at time 1 min, 2 min, and 4 min a day, and I have 4 days of measurement (one day a week). That means I have 12 samples : Day1_Min1, Day1_Min2,

If you used all 28 animals to find the model out of a group of candidate models, I would have my reservations about this 'validation'. Any confidence intervals you get from the final model are bound to be overly optimistic because you haven't accounted for the degrees of freedom chewed up during the model fitting/finding process. Matt Austin Statistician Amgen One Amgen Center

Dear R-gurus, I have an interpretation problem regarding lme models. I am currently working on dog locomotion, particularly on some variation factors. I try to figure out which limb out of 2 generated more dispersed data. I record a value called Peak, around 20 times for each limb with a record. I repeat the records during a single day, and on several days. I tried to build two models, one

Hi all! I am working on a nested lme model with one fixed effect ("treatment", which 3 levels) and two random effects for "Individuals" (four of them) within "treatment" and "replicate -2 levels-" within "individual" within "treatment". For doing so, I´ve been trying to create a factor for Individual%in%Treatment, say IT by

Windows XP R 2.10 I am trying to run lme and get the following error: > fitRandom <- lme(values ~ subject, + data=withindata) Error in getGroups.data.frame(dataMix, groups) : Invalid formula for groups my data follows, below which is a copy of all my code > > print(withindata) subject values 1 1 2.3199639 2 1 -8.5795802 3 1 -4.1901241 4

On 03/10/2019 15:05, Satay Epic via samba wrote: > We have winbind client running on CentOS 7.3.1611 host connected to MS > active directory. It is working normal for local and AD users. However > in the logs, I see that NSS is throwing call to winbind to retrieve > the groups for "root" user. I wonder why it does and what can be done > to make it stop doing that. I

Hi! First I would like to thank you for the help with my first question. However,I am afraid I am still into trouble. I think I have properly used the getGropus commad but seems to be a fatal error when calculating the fixed effects (see bellow) and I cannot understand why. Any inputs? Thanks in advance, /Jose hongos1=read.table("c:/temp/hongos1.txt", header=T) > attach(hongos1)

Hi, I am running samba 3.0.7 on a FC 2 box with the following setup (testparm output): <snip> [global] workgroup = XXXXX realm = XXXXX.YYYYY.COM security = ADS log level = 1 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 load printers = No os level = 0 preferred master = No local master = No

On 03/10/2019 15:46, Satay Epic wrote: > Thank you Rowland for your reply. My knowledge is limited with Samba > so please forgive me for any basic mistakes :) > This is something was setup by a previous admin. > > We have had issues where "winbind" will just "give up" and won't let > anyone login into the host not even from the console. > I would like

Ok. Wondering if it fix by changing the idmap backend to "ad" ? Is "ad" backend a better option than "rid" since we have MS AD or otherwise ? My next task is to ensure PAM is setup correctly with winbind. I'm going to validate the PAM configs. Do you have any recommendations of PAM / winbind settings? We also having "nscd" running for the DNS host

SSSD is not installed but I did remove it from nsswitch.conf. I still see winbind always doing the group lookup for local user. On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:05 AM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 03/10/2019 15:46, Satay Epic wrote: > > Thank you Rowland for your reply. My knowledge is limited with Samba > > so please forgive me for any basic

We have winbind client running on CentOS 7.3.1611 host connected to MS active directory. It is working normal for local and AD users. However in the logs, I see that NSS is throwing call to winbind to retrieve the groups for "root" user. I wonder why it does and what can be done to make it stop doing that. I believe it should do the lookup only for the domain/AD users. [2019/10/02

Thank you Rowland for your reply. My knowledge is limited with Samba so please forgive me for any basic mistakes :) This is something was setup by a previous admin. We have had issues where "winbind" will just "give up" and won't let anyone login into the host not even from the console. I would like to fix that problem so started to investigate the configs. I don't

I installed Centos 4.2 last night, I moved from Fedora Core 4 to it as I wanted to get off the distro upgrade treadmill, so I'm still learning about centos. I've been trying to add the memoir package to be used with latex but I can't find the exact right place for it. Can anyone who's installed it or knows about latex tell me please? Hopefully thanks Sharon. -- 12:50:25 up

> OK ... this is silly > > CentOS is an Enterprise distro and works great as a workstation. In > fact, it is just as good as Ubuntu for a desktop. I would argue that a > stable, supported for several year desktop is much better than a distro > that upgrades every 6 months. I have found just that. I was introduced to linux a couple of years ago by way of FC5 (known about it

Sorry, but I'm just an ignorant Linux user! I have a silly question. Situation: Now that R 2.1.0 is out (Thank you, to all concerned!) I'm about to go off and download it and all the packages. What this means in practice is trotting off to my "local" (and brand new) Internet Cafe with some CDs, where I can get the lot over a fast link and burn it onto a CD or two. However,

Hello all, For (system) certification purposes, we have to upgrade our 4.4 machines to 4.7. In the past I usually have just reinstalled machines to save the (perceived) headaches of upgrading. That is not an option in this case. Are there any pitfalls to watch out for when upgrading? Is it even possible to go up 3 revisions? Thanks, John -- Did you know that it costs forty thousand dollars a

We are two french students and we have a problem concerning an exercize. We don't know how to resolve it. It would be fantastic if someone can help us. Thanks. Description: This study examined how the metabolic cost of locomotion varied with speed, stride frequency and body mass. Cost was determined by measuring oxygen consumption (?vo2?), analyzing the oxygen content in air inhaled and

On Apr 24, 2017, at 7:53 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > > James' point isn't the hardware cost, it's the people cost for retraining. Unless you?ve hired monkeys so that you must train them to do their tasks by rote, that is a soft cost, not a hard cost. If you?ve hired competent IT staff, they will indeed need some time to work out the differences, but they

> From: Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > > On 29 July 2015 at 20:14, Mason Wheeler <masonwheeler at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Well, yes, an unwinding expert *was* who I was really hoping to hear from. But > > if I understand correctly, you're saying that rather than seeing the values Ben > > reported, the sample code crashes on you on both