similar to: Time series misalignment

[Re-directing to R-devel, as I think this needs changes to the code.] Can I suggest a modification to stats:predict.princomp so that it will check for column (variable) names? In src/library/stats/R/princomp-add.R, insert the following after line 4: if (!is.null(cn <- names(object$center))) newdata <- newdata[, cn] Now Dana's example looks like: > predict(pca1, frz) Error in

Dear R users, I have two data frames that were read from text files as follows: x_data <- read.table("x.txt", header = TRUE, sep = "|", quote = "\"'", dec = ".",as.is = TRUE,na.strings = "NA",colClasses = NA, nrows = 3864284, skip = 0, check.names = TRUE,fill=TRUE, strip.white = TRUE,

Hi All, I have tried every fix on my try or tryCatch that I have found on the internet, but so far have not been able to get my R code to continue with the "for loop" after the lmer model results in an error. Here is two attemps of my code, the input is a 3D array file, but really any function would do.... metatrialstry<-function(mydata){ a<-matrix(data=NA, nrow=dim(mydata)[3],

Hello, I've written a simple (although probably overly roundabout) function to test whether two regression slope coefficients from two linear models on independent data sets are significantly different. I'm a bit concerned, because when I test it on simulated data with different sample sizes and variances, the function seems to be extremely sensitive both of these. I am wondering if

Dear R-help list, I would like to perform multiple comparisons for lme. Can you report to me if my way to is correct or not? Please, note that I am not nor a statistician nor a mathematician, so, some understandings are sometimes quite hard for me. According to the previous helps on the topic in R-help list May 2003 (please, see Torsten Hothorn advices) and books such as Venables &

Dear list members, I'm interested in showing that within-group statistical dependence is negligible, so I can use ordinary linear models without including random effects. However, I can find no mention of testing a model with vs. without random effects in either Venable & Ripley (2002) or Pinheiro and Bates (2000). Our in-house statisticians are not familiar with this, either,

This continues the message "data.frame within a function (PR#9294)" that was posted on 2006/10/12. Duncan Murdoch kindly replied. I'm using the current version R 2.4.0, but the same issue exists. Just copy and paste the following code under R, and compare the output of f1() and f2() and the output of f3() and f4(). Does anybody have any idea? Thanks.

I am working with data sets in which the number and order of columns may vary, but each column is uniquely identified by its name. E.g., one data set might have columns MW logP Num_Rings Num_H_Donors while another has columns Num_Rings Num_Atoms Num_H_Donors logP MW I would like to be able to perform a principal component analysis (PCA) on one data set and save the PCA object to

Could someone please tell me how to stop the package/function name from being included before the command prompt? This started happening today after I made some changes to my Rprofile.site file and I don't know why. For example: if I enter example(AIC), instead of just getting the regular '>' before each output line, I get 'AIC>' instead. I only want the '>'

Hi, all! I'm pretty sure I'm missing something about this. Is there a smart way of typping hat(R)^2 and it's value from a linear regression? I've just found this tricky one: # Sample data x <- sample(1:100,10) y <- 2+3*x+rnorm(10) # Run the regression lm1 <- lm(y~x) # Plotting plot(x,y, main="Linear Regression", col="red")

Excuse the simple question... I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with predict, but let me use this example: Suppose I do: dat<-matrix(c(0,0,10,20),2,byrow=T) lm1<-lm(dat[,2]~dat[,1]) Suppose I want to generate the linearly-interpolated y-values between the point (0,0) and (0,20) at every unit interval. I thought I just do: predict(lm1, data.frame(seq(0,10,1))) to get

Dear R-helpers, I have run the code below which I expected to make an object called dd1, but that object does not exist. So, in summary, my problem is that my function is meant to make an object (dd1), and it does indeed make that object (I know that the last line of the function prints it out) but then, after the function has run, the object has disappeared. It's late on a Friday so I may

Dear R users, I have some trouble using the allEffects() function to compute and display effect plots for a linear model. My data is quite simple, it concerns effects of 3 treatments on the tumoral volume of mice. vTum codes for the qualitative initial volume, from small to big, temps is the time in month since beginning of treatment, and S?rie codes for the batch. Data is unbalanced. >

Dear List, I want to ask a AIC question based on package library(MuMIn) The relative importance of 16 explanatory variables are assessed using delta AIC in a generalized linear model. Please kindly advise if it is possible to show models with any two only certain variables. Thank you. Elaine I asked a similar question and got a great help for models with only one variable as below.

Hi All: the package "MuMIn" can be used to select the model based on AIC or AICc. The code is as follows: data(Cement) lm1 <- lm(y ~ ., data = Cement) dd <- dredge(lm1,rank="AIC") print(dd) If I want to select the model by BIC, what code do I need to use? And when to select the best model based on AIC, what the differences between the function "dredge" in

I have an Everex laptop (ick, but it was super cheap) that has an Atheros wireless NIC in it, but I can't seem to get it to connect to my wireless in-home LAN. Here's what I've done so far (that isn't working) - any suggestions? [root at marktop mark]# lspci | grep Ether 00:12.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev 7c) 05:01.0 Ethernet controller:

This isn't a question about R, but I'm hoping someone will be willing to help. I've been looking at calibration plots in multiple regression (plotting observed response Y on the vertical axis versus predicted response [Y hat] on the horizontal axis). According to Frank Harrell's "Regression Modeling Strategies" book (pp. 61-63), when making such a plot on new data

Dear r-helpers, Can anyone suggest why lm() doesn't complain here: summary(osss.lm1 <- lm(logOdds ~ c.setSize %in% task, data = osss)) whereas in package:nlme (and in package:lme4) osss.lmL <- lmList(logOdds ~ c.setSize %in% task | subj, data = osss) # Error in `contrasts<-`(`*tmp*`, value = "contr.treatment") : # contrasts can be applied only to factors with 2 or more

I was trying "quantreg" package, lm1 <- lm(y~x) rq1 <- rq(y~x) plot(summary(rq1)) #then got a warning says singular value, etc. but this line can be omited plot(lm1) #crash here It happened every time on my PC, Windows XP Pro Serv. Pack 1, Pentium(4) 3.00G. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I've recently encountered an issue when trying to use the predict.glm function. I've gotten into the habit of using the dataframe$variablename method of specifying terms in my model statements. I thought this unambiguous notation would be acceptable in all situations but it seems models written this way are not accepted by the predict function. Perhaps others have encountered this