similar to: gls model and matrix operations

Hello All, This is my third time attempting to post this message. I don't see it in the archive, so I'm guessing it is not getting through. If I am wrong, my apologies. I am trying to do a GLS regression, (X'V^-1X)^-1X'V^-1y, using the gls() function from the nlme package. I have the covariance matrix V. I have been searching for a way to specify the correlation structure

Hello, I am using R2.5 under Windows. Looks like the following statement vars <- (obj$sigma^2)*vw in getVarCov.gls method (nlme package) needs to be replaced with: vars <- (obj$sigma*vw)^2 With best regards Andrzej Galecki Douglas Bates wrote: >I'm not sure when the getVarCov.gls method was written or by whom. To >tell the truth I'm not really sure what

Dear List: I am having some trouble reproducing some GLS estimates using matrix operations that I am not having with other R procedures. Here are some sample data to see what I am doing along with all code: mu<-c(100,150,200,250) Sigma<-matrix(c(400,80,16,3.2,80,400,80,16,16,80,400,80,3.2,16,80,400),n c=4) sample.size<-100 temp <-

Dear List: I am working to construct a matrix of a particular form. For the most part, developing the matrix is simple and is built as follows: vl.mat<-matrix(c(0,0,0,0,0,64,0,0,0,0,64,0,0,0,0,64),nc=4) Now to expand this matrix to be block-diagonal, I do the following: sample.size <- 100 # number of individual students I<- diag(sample.size) bd.mat<-kronecker(I,vl.mat) This

Hi, I need to correct for ar(1) behavior of my residuals of my model. I noticed that there are multiple gls models in R. I am wondering if anyone has experience in choosing between gls models. For example, how should one decide whether to use lm.gls in MASS, or gls in nlme for correcting ar(1)? Does anyone have a preference? Any advice is appreciated! Thanks, -- Tom [[alternative HTML

Hello R-users, I am using gls function in R to fit a model with certain correlation structure. The medol as: fit.a<-gls(y~1,data=test.data,correlation=corAR1(form=~1|aa),method="ML") mu<-summary(fit.a)$coefficient With the toy data I made to test, the estimate of mu is exactly equal to the overall mean of y which can not be true. But, if I make a toy data with y more than two

Dear R-users I am relatively new to R, i hope my many novice questions are welcome. I have problems accessing some objects (specifically the random effects, correlation structure and variance function) from an object of class gls and lme. I used the following models: yah <- gls (outcome~ -1 + as.factor(Trial):as.factor(endpoint)+

A couple of questions: How to be sure that gls allowes errors to be correlated and/or have unequal variances? (is this on auto or is there a switch?) How to calculate confidence limits for a linear regresssion? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dthompson.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 303 bytes Desc: Card for David Thompson Url :

Dear R-help, I don't understand why Gls gives me an error when trying to fit a model with AR(2) errors, while gls (from nlme) does not. For example: library(nlme) library(rms) set.seed(1) d <- data.frame(x = rnorm(50), y = rnorm(50)) gls(y ~ x, data=d, correlation = corARMA(p=2)) #This works Gls(y ~ x, data=d, correlation = corARMA(p=2)) # Gives error # Error in

Dear All, I would like to be able to estimate confidence intervals for a linear combination of coefficients for a GLS model. I am familiar with John Foxton's helpful paper on Time Series Regression and Generalised Least Squares (GLS) and have learnt a bit about the gls function. I have downloaded the gmodels package so I can use the estimable function. The estimable function is very

Hi there, Could anyone please help me to understand what should be done in order not to get this error message: Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / options(expressions=)? Here is my code: determinant<- function(x){det(matrix(c(1.0,0.2,0.5,0.8,0.2,1.0,0.5,0.6,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,x,0.8,0.6,x,1.0),ncol=4,byrow=T))} matrix<-

Hi I have a huge array with series of data. For each cell in the array I fit a linear model, either using lm() or gls() with lm() there is no problem, but with gls() I get an error: Error in glsEstimate(glsSt, control = glsEstControl) : computed gls fit is singular, rank 2 as soon as there are data like this: > y1 <- c(0,0,0,0) > x1 <- c(0,1,1.3,0) > gls(y1~x1)

A couple weeks ago I posted a message on this topic to r-help, the response was that this seemed like odd behavior, and that I ought to post it to one of the developer lists. I posted to r-sig-mixed-models, but didn't get any response. So, with good intentions, I decided to try posting once more, but to this more general list. The goal is (1) FYI, to make you aware of this issue, in case it

This is great. Thank you for your help, but let me make sure I fully understand. Here is the looping file I use to subset the data frame, create a tex file, and Sweave it. This results in N number of tex files where N is equal to the number of rows in the data frame. list <- unique(wide$stuid) master = "master.tex" for (i in list){ tmp1 <- subset(wide, stuid==i) tmp2

Full_Name: W.B.Kloke Version: 1.8.0 OS: FreeBSD-4.7 Submission from: (NULL) (195.253.22.63) I found a parameter evaluation inconsistency in NLME package. I tried to use gls() inside a function, and I wanted use gls() for different subsets of a data frame: prgls <- function(name){ gls( log10(Y)~(cond-1)+(cond-1):t ,pr,subset=subject==name)} Applying this function with a string as parameter

Hi, I have fit a model using the rms package with the Gls() function. Is there a way to get the model estimates, std errors, and p-values (i.e. what you get with print(fit)) into latex format? I have tried: f <- Gls(...) latex(f, file='') ... but I get the following error Error in replace.substring.wild(s, old, new, test = test, front = front, : does not handle > 1 * in

Dear helpers, I wrote a code which estimates a multi-equation model with generalized least squares (GLS). I can use GLS because I know the covariance matrix of the residuals a priori. However, it is a bit slow and I wonder if anybody would be able to point out a way to make it faster (it is part of a bigger code and needs to run several times). Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated. Carlo

Dear all, I know there have been various questions posted over the years about loops but I'm afraid that I'm still stuck. I am using Windows XP and R 2.9.2. I am generating some data using the multivariate normal distribution (within the 'mnormt' package). [The numerical values of sanad and covmat are not important.] > datamat <-

Dear Colleagues, We are using the phylog.gls.fit() function from the R package "PHYLOGR" (Diaz-Uriarte R, Garland T: PHYLOGR: Functions for phylogenetically based statistical analyses. 2007. Available at [http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/PHYLOGR/index.html]) to correct for lack of independence between data points. (In our particular case, the lack of independence is due to

Dear All -- I am trying to use within a little table producing code an anova comparison of two gls fitted objects, contained in a list of such object, obtained using nlme function gls. The anova procedure fails to locate the second of the objects. The following code, borrowed from the help page of anova.gls, exemplifies: --------------- start example code --------------- library(nlme) ##