similar to: 2k-factorial design with 10 parameters

Hi, If I create a formula with say 100 terms and then paste it: xnam <- paste("x", 1:100, sep="") fmla <- as.formula(paste("y ~ ", paste(xnam, collapse= "+"))) paste(fmla) The result seems to cut off everything after the first 500 characters and gives no warning message. I have the most recent version of R from the R website and the problem occurs

Hi, Can you please help me with this please? What I am trying to do is call a vector from R function and used in the new function So I create 4 functions with these arguments M11 <- function(TrainData,TestData,mdat,nsam) { ls <- list() I have few statments one of them is vectx <- c(,1,2,3,4,5,6,6) vectz <- c(12,34,5,6,78,9,90) and then................ ls(vectx=vtecx,vectz=vectz)

Hello R-Experts, I am facing the problem that I have to estimate several parameters for a lot of different dependent variables. One single regression looks something like this: y = beta0 + beta1 * x1 + beta2 * x2 + beta3 * x1 * x2 + beta4 * x4 + beta5 * lag(x4,-1) where y is the dependent variable and xi are the independent ones. Important to me are the different estimates of betai and their

Hi! I had a database with some variables in sequence. Let me say: TX01, TX02, TX03 and TX04. But I need to run some regressions changing the variables... so: variable <- paste("TX0", 1:4, sep="") for(i in 1:4){ test[i] <- lm(variable[i] ~ INCOME, data=database) } But doesn't work... lm tries to find a variable inside database named variable[i] ... Suggestions?

Hi all, I have been trying to reproduce an analysis from Douglas Montgomery?s book on design and analysis of experiments. Table 6.10 of example 6.2 on page 246, gives a table as follows: > NPK <- expand.grid(A=mp,B=mp,C=mp,D=mp) > Rate <- c(45,71,48,65,68,60,80,65,43,100,45,104,75,86,70,96) > filtration <- cbind(NPK,Rate) > filtration A B C D Rate 1 - - - - 45 2

Hi, i need to create a fractional factorial design sufficient to estimate the main effects. The factors may have any number of levels, let's say any number from 2 to 6. I've tried to use the library conf.design , but i cannot figure out how to write the code. For example, what is the code for a design with 5 factors (2x3x3x5x2) and only main effects not confounded? thanks in advance!

I am still a little unclear in the difference between randomized block design and two-way factorial design after consulting a few books, including John Rice Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Both put observations in cells corresponding to two factors of many levels. Both use the same computer program to analyze data. It seems that randomized block design can have only one observation

Hi Everyone, I found the doe.base package and the FrF2 package to do nice experimental planning and I'm very happy about this tool I was looking for such a long time. But I still try to find out how to add center points to a full factorial design. The FrF2-package has a center point option but is just supporting fractional designs? Is there a possibility to have center points within the

Dear R Gurus: How do you put together a 2^2 (or even 2^k) factorial problem, please? Since you have 2 levels for A and B, do you put in "A+" and "A-" as factors, please? Thanks, Edna Bell

Hi all, Does anybody know if it is possible to build a fractional factorial design in R? That is, suppose that we want do design an experiment with 3 factors with 2, 3 and 3 levels, respectivly. However we want to consider, let's say, only 6 from all possible level combinations. Does R design such experiment? Thanks in advance, Caio [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I am planning a study with the main point to evaluate the interaction of two treatments, but for ethical reasons one cell is empty, that with patients receaving no treatment at all Treatment B

This list provides help on R programming (see the posting guide linked below for details on what is/is not considered on topic), and generally avoids discussion of purely statistical issues, which is what your query appears to be. The simple answer is yes, you can fit the model as described, but you clearly need the off topic discussion as to what it does or does not mean. For that, you might try

Dear R users, I need to analyze data generated from a partial two-by-two factorial design: two levels for drug A (yes, no), two levels for drug B (yes, no); however, data points are available only for three groups, no drugA/no drugB, yes drugA/no drugB, yes drugA/yes drug B, omitting the fourth group of no drugA/yes drugB. I think we can not investigate interaction between drug A and drug B,

Hello all, I´m trying to study a factorial design, but I can´t understand why did Df, Sum Sq and Mean Sq of residuals alter when I Split the interaction? I think that Split the interaction must not alter the residuals. Am I doing something wrong? Could anyone help me? My data and functions I tried are: Y<-c(196,213,183, 192,253,199, 251,331,276,

Dear R Gurus: I vaguely remember reading that if interaction was present in a factorial design, then the main effect results were suspect. However, I was reading a text which now uses the tests for main effects even if interaction is present. Which is correct, please? Thanks, Edna Bell

Hello! I have read somewhere (somehow, I can't seem to find it again, it's been a couple of months) that when analyzing factorial block design, the position where you put the block factor is important, even more when there are missing values. I understand that when using anova.lm, the order is sequential, so that if I want to check for a treatment effect, I should put my blocking factor

Hello, we have 80 text files with matrices. Each matrix represents a map (rows for latitude and columns for longitude), the 80 maps represent steps in time. In addition, we have a vector x of length 80. We would like to compute a regression between matrices (response through time) and x and create maps representing coefficients, r2 etc. Problem: the 80 matrices are of the size 4000 x 3500 and we

> On Mar 5, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Ding, Yuan Chun <ycding at coh.org> wrote: > > Hi Bert, > > I am very sorry to bother you again. > > For the following question, as you suggested, I posted it in both Biostars website and stackexchange website, so far no reply. > > I really hope that you can do me a great favor to share your points about how to explain the

Hi Bert, I am very sorry to bother you again. For the following question, as you suggested, I posted it in both Biostars website and stackexchange website, so far no reply. I really hope that you can do me a great favor to share your points about how to explain the coefficients for drug A and drug B if run anova model (response variable = drug A + drug B). is it different from running three

Dear list, given this formula: > fmla <- formula(y1 ~ spp1 + spp2 + spp3 + spp5) > fmla[[3]] spp1 + spp2 + spp3 + spp5 is this the intended behaviour of as.character: > as.character(fmla[[3]]) [1] "+" "spp1 + spp2 + spp3" "spp5" ? Where does the extra "+" come from? > as.character(fmla) [1] "~"