similar to: problem with anova and glmmPQL

Hello: Will someone PLEASE help me with this problem. This is the third time I've posted it. When I appply anova() to two equations estimated using glmmPQL, I get a complaint, > anova(fm1, fm2) Error in anova.lme(fm1, fm2) : Objects must inherit from classes "gls", "gnls" "lm","lmList", "lme","nlme","nlsList", or

Hello: I am really stuck on this problem. Why do I get an error message with anova() when I compare these two equations? Hope someone can help. ANDREW ____________________________ > fm1 <- glmmPQL(choice ~ day + stereotypy, + random = ~ 1 | bear, data = learning, family = binomial) > fm2 <- glmmPQL(choice ~ day + envir + stereotypy, + random = ~ 1 |

Hello: Let me rephrase my question to attract interest in the problem I'm having. When I appply anova() to two equations estimated using glmmPQL, I get a complaint, > anova(fm1, fm2) Error in anova.lme(fm1, fm2) : Objects must inherit from classes "gls", "gnls" "lm","lmList", "lme","nlme","nlsList", or "nls"

Dear All, I've come across a problem in predict.lme. Assigning a model formula to a variable and then using this variable in lme (instead of typing the formula into the formula part of lme) works as expect. However, when performing a predict on the fitted model I gan an error messag - predict.lme (but not predictlm) seems to expect a 'properly' typed in formula and a cannot extract

Thanks Don MacQueen for this reply to my initial query - please SEE MY REPLIES TO THESE IDEAS AND FURTHER INFORMATION BELOW >From: Don MacQueen [macq at llnl.gov] >Sent: 23 February 2010 21:25 >To: Jonathan Williams; r-help at r-project.org > >Subject: Re: [R] Problem with strptime generating missing values where none appear to exist > >What happens if you do all that NA

Hi all, I am having issues comparing models with lmer. As an example, when I run the code below the model summaries (AIC, BIC, loglik) differ between the summary() and anova() commands. Can anyone clear up what's wrong? Thank you! Darren Ward library(lme4) data(sleepstudy) fm1<-lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1|Subject), sleepstudy) summary(fm1) fm2<-lmer(Reaction ~ Days +

My question concerns the logic behind hypothesis tests for fixed-effect terms in models fitted with lme. Suppose the levels of Subj indicate a grouping structure (k subjects) and Trt is a two-level factor (two treatments) for which there are several (n) responses y from each treatment and subject combination. If one suspects a subject by treatment interaction, either of the following models seem

Dear R community, I'm trying to understand this behavior of TukeyHSD. My goal is to obtain defensible, labelled multiple comparisons of an interaction term. Firstly, if I plot the TukeyHSD from the model that calculates its own interactions, then the y-axis labels appear to be reflected on their median when compared to the text output of the TukeyHSD statement. The labels are integers.

Dear all, I noticed the following in the call of lme using msVerbose. fm1 <- lme(distance ~ age, data = Orthodont, control = lmeControl(msVerbose=T)) 9 318.073: -0.567886 0.152479 1.98021 10 318.073: -0.567191 0.152472 1.98009 11 318.073: -0.567208 0.152473 1.98010 fm2 <- lme(distance ~ age, random =~age, data = Orthodont,

Hi, I have a string that I want to use in a variable call. How can I remove the quotes and/or the string properties of the string to use it in a variable call? Here's an example: library(lme) fm2 <- lme(distance ~ age, data = Orthodont, random = ~ 1) summary(fm2) I want to update the above regression to include new predictors according to what is in a string: predictors <-

Dear all I want to compute Monte Carlo p-values in lmer-models based on sampled data sets. To speed up calculations, I've tried to use internal functions from the Matrix package (as suggested ealier on the list by Doug Bates). So I did: fm2 <- lmer(resistance ~ ET + position + (1|Grp), Semiconductor,method='ML') simdata<-simulate(fm2,nsim=1) ynew <- simdata[,1] mer

Paul: I may have found the issue (which is similar to your conclusion). I checked using egsingle in the mlmRev package as these individuals are strictly nested in this case: library(mlmRev) library(nlme) fm1 <- lme(math ~ year, random=~1|schoolid/childid, egsingle) fm2 <- lmer(math ~ year +(1|schoolid:childid) + (1|schoolid), egsingle) Checking the summary of both models, the output is

Hello, I wanted to fit a linear mixed model to a data that is similar in terms of design to the 'Machines' data in 'nlme' package except that each worker (with triplicates) only operates one machine. I created a subset of observations from 'Machines' data such that it looks the same as the data I wanted to fit the model with (see code below). I fitted a model in

The subject says it all really. Question 1. Here is some code created to illustrate my problem, can anyone spot where I'm going wrong? Question 2. The reason I'm following a manual specification of models relates to the fact that in reality I am using mgcv::gam, and I'm not aware that dredge is able to separate individual smooth terms out of say s(a,b). Hence an additional request,

Using formulas constructed from strings only partially works for me in lme: library(nlme) data(Orthodont) fm2<-lme(as.formula("distance~age"),data=Orthodont,random=~1|Subject) summary(fm2) # works augPred(fm2) # fails #Error in inherits(object, "formula") : #Argument "object" is missing, with no default I assume that my use of as.formula is wrong, but

> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:22:24 +0000 > From: Lilla Di Scala <lilla at dimat.unipv.it> > I have a problem regarding the anova() output. When I apply it to a > single regression model, I do not understand how the values > corresponding to the F statistics are obtained by the software. I > believe that they are computed using differences between residual sums > of

Hi there, I have a data frame as listed below: > Ca.P.Biomass.A P Biomass 1 334.5567 0.2870000 2 737.5400 0.5713333 3 894.5300 0.6393333 4 782.3800 0.5836667 5 857.5900 0.6003333 6 829.2700 0.5883333 I have fit the data using logistic, Michaelis?Menten, and linear model, they all give significance. > fm1 <- nls(Biomass~SSlogis(P, phi1, phi2, phi3), data=Ca.P.Biomass.A)

Hi there fellow R-users, I am trying to follow an example of modelling a serial correlation structure in the textbook "Mixed Effects Model in S and Splus". However, I am getting some very odd results. Here is what I am trying to run: library(nlme) data(Ovary) fm1<-lme(follicles~sin(2*pi*Time)+cos(2*pi*Time),data=Ovary,random=pdDiag(~s in(2*pi*Time))) ### The example is fine up

Dear people of the help list I am drying to analyze my data using the 'lmer' function and I keep having problems. This is the model: > fm1<-lmer(dbh~spec+scheme+(1|Plot),data=d, REML=FALSE). I analyse tree size (dbh) of 3 different species (spec) and 3 planting schemes (scheme). I have 5 plots, which I hope to model as a random factor. (However, the subsequent output is based on

Dear All -- I am trying to use within a little table producing code an anova comparison of two gls fitted objects, contained in a list of such object, obtained using nlme function gls. The anova procedure fails to locate the second of the objects. The following code, borrowed from the help page of anova.gls, exemplifies: --------------- start example code --------------- library(nlme) ##