similar to: cannot access /mnt/glusterfs: Stale NFS file handle

I'm getting Input/output errors on gluster mounted directories. First, I have a few directories I created a few weeks ago, but when I run an ls on them, their status is listed as ???????: [23:52:54] [root at clustr06 /mnt/glusterfs]# ls -al ls: cannot access lost+found: Input/output error ls: cannot access bhl: Input/output error total 1920 drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 294912 2010-05-13 19:11 .

I have glusterfs 3.1.2 running on Debian, I'm able to start the volume and now mount it via mount -t gluster and I can see everything. I am still seeing the following error in /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log [2011-02-04 13:09:16.404851] E [client-handshake.c:1079:client_query_portmap_cbk] bhl-volume-client-98: failed to get the port number for remote subvolume [2011-02-04 13:09:16.404909] I

NOTE: posted this to gluster-devel when I meant to post it to gluster-users 01 | 02 mirrored --| 03 | 04 mirrored --| distributed 05 | 06 mirrored --| 1) Would this command work for that? glusterfs-volgen --name repstore1 --raid 1 clustr-01:/mnt/data01 clustr-02:/mnt/data01 --raid 1 clustr-03:/mnt/data01 clustr-04:/mnt/data01 --raid 1 clustr-05:/mnt/data01 clustr-06:/mnt/data01 So the

I have a distributed/replicated setup with Glusterfs 3.0.2, that I'm testing on 4 servers, each with access to /mnt/gluster (which consists of all directories /mnt/data01 - data24) on each server. I'm using configs I built from volgen, but every time I access a file (via an 'ls -l') for the first time, I get all of these messages in my logs on each server: [2010-05-04 10:50:30] W

Thanks for any information and your time!!! I have been working on getting my samba 2.2.5 server to work with my 2K domain in (native mode). Setup is on a RH 7.3 system with two NIC's one on a Internet network the other is for the LAN. What I need is to get the XP/2K/4.0 systems to see the samba shares and us them based on the users and groups that are on the domain. This is a 2K AD

Thanks for any information and your time!!! I have been working on getting my samba 2.2.5 server to work with my 2K domain in (native mode). Setup is on a RH 7.3 system with two NIC's one on a Internet network the other is for the LAN. What I need is to get the XP/2K/4.0 systems to see the samba shares and us them based on the users and groups that are on the domain. This is a 2K AD

When I try to connect to * using a Cisco ATA 188 configured with a MGPC firmware (v3.1.1), I just keep getting this message every 30 seconds or so : May 10 10:08:21 NOTICE[7913]: chan_mgcp.c:1509 find_subchannel: Gateway '192.168.1.27' (and thus its endpoint '*') does not exist Using tcpdump, I have checked that the ATA188 (with IP 192.168.1.27 and port 2427) sends UDP packets to

Hi, on CentOS 6.3 (32-bit) current & default GnuTLS is version 2.8.5-4.el6_2.2 gnutls.i686 ( where can i get a src rpm for at-least trying it from a 2nd/different directory ? ) Can someone kindly point to an article that will help to effectively upgrade to GnuTLS v3.1.1 or later+stable version, on CentOS 6.3 (32-bit) ? Need the DANE supported GnuTLS, will be used for various GnuTLS depended

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, opensuse 13.2 linux v3.16.7-7-desktop x86_64 rsync v3.1.1 I used rsync to copy /usr/ to another volume with these options: - --recursive --one-file-system --links --stats --itemize-changes - --quiet --delete --times After I had modified the system to use the new /usr volume, I realized I should have added: - --perms --owner --group

Does anybody has the expirience configuring Asterisk with Cisco ATA 186 MGCP firmware ? I have Cisco software v3.1.1 atamgcp (Build 040629A) Asterisk 1.0-RC1 On ATA i only put domain test. mgcp.conf looks like this [test] host = 192.168.195.55 context = default line => aaln/2 line => aaln/1 Asterisk CLI shows this: Jul 31 16:05:40 WARNING[135449600]: chan_mgcp.c:485

On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:23:44 +0000 just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12819 > > --- Comment #7 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- > Note that my patch simply adds a sync() just after recv_files(), so > one sync() per connection, not per write operation. >

I am having an issue adding new clients to puppet. The master is not accepting connections from unauthenticated clients, even though my auth.conf that worked with v3.1.1 has not changed. If I test ssl via curl -k, the puppet master returns "can''t convert nil into String" to the client. The http log on the master shows a 400 return code. Also note, I''m using

I''ve been working on this on the odd occasion, I think it mostly works, or it did last I tried which was a while back. I''m sure it is too hacky in places. My plan was to clean it up on the next test day. I''m mostly just sending this for Wei''s benefit since he is independently looking at adding Debian HVM guest tests for OVMF purposes. Ian. commit

Hi guys, we have a rebalance running on eight bricks since July and this is what the status looks like right now: ===Tue Oct 18 13:45:01 CST 2011 ==== rebalance step 1: layout fix in progress: fixed layout 223623 There are roughly 8T photos in the storage,so how long should this rebalance take? What does the number (in this case) 22362 represent? Our gluster infomation: Repository

Hi everyone, Rails 3.1.2.rc2 has been released. Dont ask about rc1! Please give it a try, but first read the important note below. If there are no release blockers, then I will be releasing the final version some time after 16:00 UTC on 17th November. ## IMPORTANT NOTE FOR RC TESTERS ## Rails 3.1.2 will depend on sprockets 2.1. The current stable version of sass-rails (3.1.4) depends on

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:03 AM, James Moe <jimoe at sohnen-moe.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > opensuse 13.2 > linux v3.16.7-7-desktop x86_64 > rsync v3.1.1 > > I used rsync to copy /usr/ to another volume with these options: > - --recursive --one-file-system --links --stats --itemize-changes > - --quiet

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Normally, I would say that --checksum is actually slower than just > letting rsync re-copy everything Depends on the network capacity and costs associated with that bandwidth :( >and therefore is almost always the > wrong thing to do. Nope,

> On 15 Jun 2017, at 19:29, Karl O. Pinc via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:23:44 +0000 > just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync > <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12819 >> >> --- Comment #7 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Normally, I would say that --checksum is actually slower than just letting rsync re-copy everything and therefore is almost always the wrong thing to do. However, in this case, you really don't want to overwrite the running OS even with files that are essentially the same. So, if the system is running from that storage then --checksum might

*Paid internship "web application development with R"* The main skills for this proposed paid internship are: R, Shiny, and components used by Shiny (plotly, javascript). Other skills (Debian, Docker, CKAN...) are useful. This internship offer is part of a partnership between the Grenoble Alpes Cybersecurity Institute and the CYBIS project. The *Cybersecurity Institute* aims to