similar to: Plotting Mean in plotting degree distribution

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "Plotting Mean in plotting degree distribution"

2011 May 03
3
Watts Strogatz game
Hi, I have a erdos-renyi game with 6000 nodes and probability 0.003. g1 = erdos.renyi.game(6000, 0.003) How to create a Watts Strogatz game with the same probability. g1 = watts.strogatz.game(1, 6000, ?, ?) What should be the third and fourth parameter to this argument. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Watts-Strogatz-game-tp3491922p3491922.html Sent from the R
2011 Apr 26
1
Barplot for degree distribution
In barplot for degree distribution x-axis is not seen. See the example below > g = barabasi.game(500, 0.4) > dd1 = degree.distribution(g) > plot(dd1, xlab="degree", ylab = "frequency") whereas barplot doesnot have any x-axis > barplot(dd1, xlab = "degree", ylab = "frequency") Please see the figures attached.
2009 Mar 03
1
save the layout using igraph
Hi R users, I am using built-in functions in igraph package to draw networks . I need to compare several network with exactly the same structure but with edge hightlighted differently. I am wondering if there is a way to save the layout so that every graph will look the same as each other except for the colors of edges. Or is there any parameter I can set for this purpose?? Thanks in advance,
2007 Oct 09
3
igraph and plotting connected components
Hello there, I am using the igraph package to build graphs from my data. If I plot a graph though, it's not easy for me to see what's going on. Does anybody know how to rearrange a graph to get a plot without too many crossing lines? Maybe other packages? Thanks a lot in advance for any pointers, -- D --------------------------------- [[alternative
2012 Aug 15
3
per-vertex statistics of edge weights
I have a graph with edge and vertex weights, stored in two data frames: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- vertices <- data.frame(vertex=c("a","b","c","d"),weight=c(1,2,1,3)) edges <-
2014 Jul 21
2
Inserción de condicionales en pequeño código
Buenas tardes, He construido la función “myfun” al objeto de considerar aquellas persones que a partir de una determinada fecha de Apertura tienen como mínimo 65 años. Se tiene su fecha de nacimiento, su fecha de inicio en la institución y su fecha de salida de la misma. Doy vueltas al script y no acabo se saber cómo poder aplicar de un modo eficiente las instrucciones “if” ó bien “ifelse”, y me
2013 Jan 18
1
Object created within a function disappears after the function is run
Dear R-helpers, I have run the code below which I expected to make an object called dd1, but that object does not exist. So, in summary, my problem is that my function is meant to make an object (dd1), and it does indeed make that object (I know that the last line of the function prints it out) but then, after the function has run, the object has disappeared. It's late on a Friday so I may
2012 Aug 06
1
more efficient way to parallel
Dear All, Suppose I have a program as below: Outside is a loop for simulation (with random generated data), inside there are several sapply()'s (10~100) over the data and something else, but these sapply's have to be sequential. And each sapply do not involve very intensive calculation (a few seconds only). So the outside loop takes minutes to finish one iteration. I guess the better way
2011 Nov 15
5
Convert back to lower triangular matrix
Given a vector;> ab = seq(0.5,1, by=0.1)> ab[1] 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 The euclidean distance between the vector elements is given by the lower triangular matrix > dd1 = dist(ab,"euclidean")> dd1    1   2   3   4   52 0.1                3 0.2 0.1            4 0.3 0.2 0.1        5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1    6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Convert the lower triangular matrix to a full
2011 Nov 15
1
Convert full matrix back to lower triangular matrix
Given a vector;> ab = seq(0.5,1, by=0.1)> ab[1] 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 The euclidean distance between the vector elements is given by the lower triangular matrix > dd1 = dist(ab,"euclidean")> dd1    1   2   3   4   52 0.1                3 0.2 0.1            4 0.3 0.2 0.1        5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1    6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Convert the lower triangular matrix to a full
2010 Aug 16
1
data frame handling
Dear all, I have an xts object , t.xts with 4 columns: "v1" "DD1" "v2" "DD2" and created a data frame : t <- as.data.frame(t.xts) I would like to extract data and create a new data frame for when the values in column DD1 falls between 0 and 30 and extract the corresponding v1 value. How can I do this? Thanks. -- View this message in context:
2008 Apr 14
3
Doing the right amount of copy for large data frames.
Hi there, Problem :: When one tries to change one or some of the columns of a data.frame, R makes a copy of the whole data.frame using the '*tmp*' mechanism (this does not happen for components of a list, tracemem( ) on R-2.6.2 says so). Suggested solution :: Store the columns of the data.frame as a list inside of an environment slot of an S4 class, and define the '[',
2003 Dec 04
4
bug in as.POSIXct ?
I think that there is a bug in the as.POSIXct function on Windows. Here is what I get on Win2000, Pentium III machine in R 1.8.1. > dd1 <- ISOdatetime(2003, 10, 26, 0, 59, 59) > dd2 <- ISOdatetime(2003, 10, 26, 1, 0, 0) > dd2 - dd1 Time difference of 1.000278 hours Now, the 26th of October was the day that change to the standard time occurred, so I suspect that this has
2007 Jun 28
3
Function call within a function.
I am trying to call a funtion within another function and I clearly am misunderstanding what I should do. Below is a simple example. I know lstfun works on its own but I cannot seem to figure out how to get it to work within ukn. Basically I need to create the variable "nts". I have probably missed something simple in the Intro or FAQ. Any help would be much appreciated. EXAMPLE
2006 Aug 24
1
Using a 'for' loop : there should be a better way in R
I need to apply a yearly inflation factor to some wages and supply some simple sums by work category. I have gone at it with a brute force "for" loop approach which seems okay as it is a small dataset. It looks a bit inelegant and given all the warnings in the Intro to R, etc, about using loops I wondered if anyone could suggest something a bit simpler or more efficent? Example:
2023 Jul 08
1
Getting an error calling MASS::boxcox in a function
No, I'm afraid I'm wrong. Something went wrong with my R session and gave me incorrect answers. After restarting, I continued to get the same error as you did with my supposed "fix." So just ignore what I said and sorry for the noise. -- Bert On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 8:28?AM Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > Try this for your function: > >
2023 Jul 08
1
Getting an error calling MASS::boxcox in a function
Dear Ron and Bert, First (and without considering why one would want to do this, e.g., adding a start of 1 to the data), the following works for me: ------ snip ------ > library(MASS) > BoxCoxLambda <- function(z){ + b <- boxcox(z + 1 ~ 1, + lambda = seq(-5, 5, length.out = 101), + plotit = FALSE) + b$x[which.max(b$y)] + } > mrow <- 500
2023 Jul 08
1
Getting an error calling MASS::boxcox in a function
Hi, Firstly, apologies as I have posted this on community.rstudio.com too. I want to optimise a Box-Cox transformation on columns of a matrix (ie, a unique lambda for each column). So I wrote a function that includes the call to MASS::boxcox in order that it can be applied to each column easily. Except that I'm getting an error when calling the function. If I just extract a column of the
2018 Oct 05
2
Seg fault stats::runmed
Dear all, I just found this issue: dd1 = c(rep(NaN,82), rep(-1, 144), rep(1, 74)) xx = runmed(dd1, 21) -> R crashes reproducibly in R 3.4.3, R3.4.4 (Ubuntu 14.04/Ubuntu 16.04) With GDB: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. swap (l=53, r=86, window=window at entry=0xc59308, outlist=outlist at entry=0x12ea2e8, nrlist=nrlist at entry=0x114fdd8, print_level=print_level at
2008 Mar 24
1
Great difference for piecewise linear function between R and SAS
Dear Rusers, I am now using R and SAS to fit the piecewise linear functions, and what surprised me is that they have a great differrent result. See below. #R code--Knots for distance are 16.13 and 24, respectively, and Knots for y are -0.4357 and -0.3202 m.glm<-glm(mark~x+poly(elevation,2)+bs(distance,degree=1,knots=c(16.13,24)) +bs(y,degree=1,knots=c(-0.4357,-0.3202