similar to: error in saved .csv

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: nem el?rhet? URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110420/4913654b/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: nem el?rhet? URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110421/2b2b582b/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: nem el?rhet? URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20100422/0a8b89ec/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: nem el?rhet? URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20130412/f2e12b77/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: nem el?rhet? URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20100420/33e1cc15/attachment.pl>

Hello all, I had some trouble recently with write.csv because I couldn't change one of the default options. A quick view of the code showed that the function was not defined in the most optimal way. Currently, write.csv <- function (..., col.names = NA, sep = ",", qmethod = "double") write.table(..., col.names = NA, sep = ",", qmethod = "double")

The write.csv() function is currently implemented as function (..., col.names=NA, sep=",", qmethod="double") { write.table(..., col.names=NA, sep=",", qmethod="double") } Surely, it should be function (..., col.names=NA, sep=",", qmethod="double") { write.table(..., col.names=col.names, sep=sep,

Dear R developers, It would be great if you could implement the two minor code changes suggested below, which would help processing large objects in R. Jens Oehlschl?gel # Wish no. 1: let [.AsIs return the class AFTER subsetting, not the class of the original object # Wish no. 2: adjust write.csv and write.csv2 for multiple calls in chunked writing # Rationale no. 1: a couple of packages

Le 19/04/2018 ? 09:30, Tomas Kalibera a ?crit?: > On 04/19/2018 02:06 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> On 18/04/2018 5:08 PM, Tousey, Colton wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I want to report a bug in R that is limiting my capabilities to >>> export a matrix with write.csv or write.table with over >>> 2,147,483,648 elements (C's int limit). I found

Full_Name: Stefan Albrecht Version: 2.7.2 (and 2.8.0) OS: Windows NT Submission from: (NULL) (194.127.8.17) Dear R Debug-Team, in write.csv() it is not possible to set both row.names = FALSE, col.names = FALSE since the col.names = FALSE gets overwritten: > write.csv function (...) { Call <- match.call(expand.dots = TRUE) for (argname in c("col.names", "sep",

Full_Name: Kingsley Oteng-Amoako Version: 2.5.1 OS: Windows 5.1.2600 (Windows XP) Submission from: (NULL) (203.185.215.144) The col.names=false in the write.csv command does not work as documented. Attempting to write a vector to a csv file without column headers does not work as documented. The col.names=false feature on the write.table command does however work and it can thus be coerced

Thanks to all who have responded. My concern was to be able to write a csv file that can have line feeds in string columns chr(10). Why? Excel allows line feeds chr(10) within cells and line breaks chr(13)+chr(10) at line ending, but the windows version of R automatically replaces \n by \r\n in writing and \r\n by \n in reading (text mode). The clues for a solution came from Brian Ripley and

Hi there My script at each iteration produces a .dat file which I save in a directory with write.table. Then I need to read each line of this file and create a directory for each line and put elements of that row in that directory. I do it with the following script which I have inserted somewhere between my outer iteration loop, it works fine for the first iteration, but the problem is that it

Dear all, Supposed I run the following command: ############################### #install.packages("Rassoc", dependencies=TRUE) library("Rassoc") ca=c(139,249,112) co=c(136,244,120) a=rbind(ca,co) MAX3(a,"asy",1) ############################## I get: The MAX3 test using the asy method data: a statistic = 0.5993, p-value = 0.7933 How can one save the result

Thanks in advance for reading my question. This is my first time working with R, though I have some intro-level experience with other languages. I am writing a program that performs a certain set of calculations on each row of a list of data, and here's what I have so far: for (i in 1:2858) { Calc_1 <- some_stuff Calc_2 <- some_more_stuff Calc_3 <-

Using write.table i would like to save data as an excel file to a folder. I am not too sure how to write the file path or what to name the file. I would appreciate any feedback. > write.table(x, file = "", append = FALSE, quote = TRUE, sep = " ", + eol = "\n", na = "NA", dec = ".", row.names = TRUE, + col.names =

I've found several similar issues with write.table/read.table with Dates on this list, but trying to follow this advice I still get an error. First, I read in data from several files, constructing several date/time columns using ISOdatetime > str(Tall$Begin) 'POSIXct', format: chr [1:40114] "2005-10-02 00:00:00" "2005-10-02 00:00:00" ... > length(Tall$Begin)

Dear R developers, I am developing an R package which returns strings with new line codes. I am not sure if I should use "\r\n" or "\n" in my returned strings on Windows platforms. What is the recommended best practice for package developers (and code in base R) for coding new lines in strings? And just out of curiosity: What is the reason (or history) for preferring

Dear Sir / Madam, I am new for R coding. Kindly help me out in sorting out the following problem. There are 50 rows with six coloumns(you could see in the attached .txt file). I wish to go for filtering this 50 rows for any one of the six coloumns satisfying the value >= 64. I need to have a final table with rows having >= 64 value in any one of the six coloumns and the rest could be

On 18/04/2018 5:08 PM, Tousey, Colton wrote: > Hello, > > I want to report a bug in R that is limiting my capabilities to export a matrix with write.csv or write.table with over 2,147,483,648 elements (C's int limit). I found this bug already reported about before: https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17182. However, there appears to be no solution or fixes in upcoming