similar to: function optimization

Hi I have a code that calculate maximisation using optimx and it is working just fine. I want to extend the code to run several colomns of R_j where j runs from 1 to 200. If I am to run the code in its current state, it means I will have to run it 200 times manually. May you help me adjust it to accomodate several rows of R_j and print the 200 results. ***Please do not get intimidated by the

Dear R users When I use OPTIM with BFGS, I've got a significant result without an error message. However, when I use OPTIMX with BFGS( or spg), I've got the following an error message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > optimx(par=theta0, fn=obj.fy, gr=gr.fy, method="BFGS", >

With some chagrin after spending a couple of hours trying to debug a script, I realized I had typed in something like ans<-optimx(start, myfn, mygr, lower<-lo, upper=up) that is, the "<-" rather than "=". The outcome on my machine was a non-obvious error several layers deep in the call stack. For info, optim() seems to stop much more quickly. The error is

Dear R users I am trying to use OPTIMX(OPTIM) for nonlinear optimization. There is no error in my code but the results are so weird (see below). When I ran via OPTIM, the results are that Initial values are that theta0 = 0.6 1.6 0.6 1.6 0.7. (In fact true vales are 0.5,1.0,0.8,1.2, 0.6.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >

Hi to all the people, I'm working with abundance data of some species, but containing too zero values, and the factors are the ones typical in a BACI experiment (Before-and-After-Control-Impact). Thus, these are two fixed factors. As the data does not holds the normality and homogeneity of variances assumptions of clasiccal ANOVA, I'm trying to fit a zero-altered model using the MCMC glmm

Dear R-er, For a non-linear optimisation, I used optim() with BFGS method but it stopped regularly before to reach a true mimimum. It was not a problem with limit of iterations, just a local minimum. I was able sometimes to reach better minimum using several rounds of optim(). Then I moved to optimx() to do the different optim rounds automatically using "Nelder-Mead" and

This is mainly a reminder to others developing R packages to be careful not to supply control list items that are not used by the called package. Optimx is a wrapper package that aims to provide a common syntax to a number of existing optimization packages. Recently in extending optimx package I inadvertently introduced a new control for optimx which is NOT in any of the wrapped optimization

Dear people, I'm trying to do some analysis of a data using the models by Royle & Donazio in their fantastic book, particular the following function: http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/pubanalysis/roylebook/panel4pt1.fn that applied to my data and in the console is as follows: > `desman.y` <- structure(c(3L,4L,3L,2L,1L), .Names = c("1", "2", "3",

Hi all (again), many thanks for the answer to the optimization problem. All is fine now. The problem now is with kernel estimators in sm. package. I do all the work and the graphics good, but I need the density function data for each point, and I don't know how to get it. The only thing I get is the table at the end of the following sequence: >

I'll not copy all the previous material on this thread to avoid overload. The summary is that all the methods Spencer has tried have some issues. The bad news: This is not uncommon with optimization methods, in part because the problems are "hard", in part because getting them implemented and linked to an interfacing approach like R is very tedious and prone to omissions and

Prof Nash, Prof Galanos Is it possible to use a generic code stub in front of packages that use optimx to improve optimx use or curtail it according to the requirements? Best Regards Amit +91 7899381263 ________________________________________________________________________ Please request Skype as available 5th Year FPM (Ph.D.) in Finance and Accounting Area Indian Institute

In re-factoring my optimx package, I'm finding that the pdf output has some lines that are outside the margins (and there are warnings in R CMD check optimx). Clearly I can fix this by editing the tex file that is generated, but the build infrastructure would still get things wrong in automatic processing. So that gives rise to 3 questions: 1) How do I adjust the DESCRIPTION file to avoid too

I have not included the previous postings because they came out very strangely on my mail reader. However, the question concerned the choice of minimizer for the zeroinfl() function, which apparently allows any of the current 6 methods of optim() for this purpose. The original poster wanted to use Newton-Raphson. Newton-Raphson (or just Newton for simplicity) is commonly thought to be the

Good afternoon everybody, I'm quite new in functions optimization on R and, whereas I've read lot's of function descriptions, I'm not sure of the correct settings for function like "optimx" and "nlminb". I'd like to minimize my parameters and the loglikelihood result of the function. My parameters are a mean distance of dispersion and a proportion of

I was preparing a fix for a minor glitch in my optimx package and R CMD check gave an error that the title was not in title case. It is A Replacement and Extension of the optim() Function R CMD check suggests the incorrect form A Replacement and Extension of the Optim() Function 'Writing R Extensions' suggests single quotes, i.e., A Replacement and Extension of the 'optim()'

Hi to all the people again, I was writting a simply function in R, and wish to collect the results in a excel file. The work goes as follows, Ciervos<-function(K1, K0, A, R,M,Pi,Hembras) {B<-(K1-K0)/A T1<-(R*Pi*Hembras-M*Pi+B)/(Pi-M*Pi+R*Pi*Hembras) P1<-Pi-B R1<-P1*Hembras*R M1<-P1*M T2<-(R1-M1+B)/(P1-M1+R1) P2<-P1-B R2<-P2*Hembras*R M2<-P2*M

---------- Forwarded message --------- De: Jose Betancourt Bethencourt <betanster en gmail.com> Date: sáb, 26 oct 2024 a las 16:14 Subject: OPTIMIZACIÓN To: <r-help-es-request en r-project.org> Estimados Corri este código y funciona todo bien , menos la ultima parte de optimización apreciaria su ayuda José # Cargar bibliotecas necesarias library(deSolve) library(optimx) #

Hi, Mark et al.: Thanks, Mark. Three comments: 1. Rvmmin was one of the methods I tried after Ravi directed me to optimx. It returned NAs for essentially everything. See my email of this subject stamped 4:43 PM Central time = 21:43 UTC. 2. It would be interesting to know if the current algorithm behind optim and optimx with

Dear Sir/ Madam, I'm having trouble de-bugging the following - which works perfectly well with optim or optimx - but not with mle2. I'd be really grateful if someone could show me what is wrong. Many thanks in advance. JSC: gompertz<- function (x,t=data) { a3<-x[1] b3<-x[2] shift<-data[1] h.t<-a3*exp(b3*(t-shift))

Hi Reuben, I am puzzled to note that the gradient check in "optimx" does not work for you. Can you send me a reproducible example so that I can figure this out? John - I think the best solution for now is to issue a "warning" rather than an error message, when the numerical gradient is not sufficiently close to the user-specified gradient. Best, Ravi.