similar to: expand.grid

Hello list. This is from an R session (admittedly, I''m still using R 2.11.1): > print function (x, ...) UseMethod("print") <environment: namespace:base> > showMethods("print") Function "print": <not a generic function> Don''t the two results contradict each other? Or do I have a terrible misunderstanding of what

Hello list. I was trying to see some of the code for plot.glmnet in package glmnet (this function name is in the documentation). After loading the library, I tried the obvious typing in the name, but I received a message telling me it could not be found. So I fiddled around a little, and noticed that R does not recognize ''plot'' as a generic function, and as such,

Dear list, I''ve had this a few times now, and wonder if this is possible: I''m using a package, often for plotting something, but I want to tune the way the plotting goes, in a way that was not foreseen by the maker of the package. Now, most of the time, these kinds of R functions (say pkg::plot.something) call into other R functions (say pkg::plot.something.internal), and

Hello list. Another 'puzzle' for which I don't have a clean solution. Say I have a multidimensional object, e.g.: Mm<-matrix(1:6, nrow=2, dimnames=list(c("a","b"), c("g","h","i"))) And on the other hand I have a list Ind<-list("b","g") This holds, for each dimension, an indexer for that dimension. Now I would

Hi All. I often find myself in this situation: . Based on some vector (or list) of values, I need to calculate a few new values for each of them, where some of the new values are numbers, but some are more of descriptive nature (so: character strings) . So I use e.g. sapply, passing a custom function that returns a list with all the calculated values . The result of

Hi R people. I ran into this problem: I created a plot with errbars, like this: > errbar(x=c(1,2,3,4), y=c(2,1,3,3), yminus=c(1.5,0.5,2.5,2.5), yplus=c(2.5,1.5,3.5,3.5)) Next, I wanted to accentuate some x value with an abline, like this: > abline(v=2) In one of my R sessions (which admittedly I have had open for quite a while now), the abline draws outside of the plotting region

Dear all, I've recently had some issues getting my package to successfully "check". This was on R-Forge, so it's not obvious for me to provide SessionInfo or the likes (if necessary, Stefan can chime in?). After some research (mainly by Stefan Theussler, driving force behind R-Forge), this turned out to be the root cause: On R-Forge, the version of R installed was the

While building/checking a package of mine that depends on glmnet, I got the following message: * checking whether the name space can be loaded with stated dependencies ...Warn ing: running command ''"C:/Users/nisabbe/Documents/R/R-2.13.1/bin/i386/Rterm.exe" R_DEFAULT_PACKAGES=NULL --vanilla --slave -f C:\Users\nisabbe\AppData\Local\Tem p\RtmpZpjj07\Rin121ae93''

This problem is likely to be specific to Windows, and particularly Win7. After a successful build of a package (R CMD build addendum), I immediately run an R CMD check for the same package. Not always, but _very_ often, I get the following error: C:\Users\nisabbe\Documents\@Doctoraat\R>R CMD check addendum Loading required package: tcltk Loading Tcl/Tk interface ... done Loading

Hello all. I'm developing a package for R holding a Gibbs sampler, which tends to have better performance when written in C than in R. During each iteration in the Gibbs sampler, I need the inverse of a symmetric matrix. For this, I wish to use lapack, as is concisely suggested in "Writing R extensions", since this will have better performance than I could ever write myself. After

Hello list. For some reason, the makers of glmnet do not accept a dataframe as input. They expect the input to be a matrix, where the dummies are already precoded. Now I have created a sample dataset with . 11 factor columns with two levels . 4 factor columns with three levels . 135 continuous columns (from a standard normal) . 100 observations (rows) Say this dataframe is in dfrPredictors. What

Hi! This is my first time posting. I've read the general rules and guidelines, but please bear with me if I make some fatal error in posting. Anyway, I have a continuous response and 29 predictors made up of continuous variables and nominal and ordinal categorical variables. I'd like to do lasso on these, but I get an error. The way I am using "lars" doesn't allow for the

Hi, I'm trying to do some basic social network analysis with igraph in R, but I'm new to R and haven't been able to find documentation on a couple basic things: I want to run igraph's community detection algorithms on a couple thousand small graphs but don't know how to automate igraph looking at multiple graphs described in a single csv file. My data look like something in

Hi all. I'll start by introducing the origin of the problem, although it appears to me that it goes beyond my specific setting. I'm currently working on a method for finding the 'lowest named function call' on the call stack. I am aware that the name of a function is not uniquely defined, but for most reasonable cases, the intended name can be easily induced. You can see some of

Hi, R users, Here is an example. k <- c(1,2,3,4,5) i <- c(0,1,3,2,1) if k=1, then j=0 from i if k=2, then j=0, 1 from i if k=3, then j=0, 1, 2, 3 from i if k=4, then j=0, 1, 2 from i if k=5, then j=0, 1 from i so i'd like to create a list like below. > list k j 1 1 0 2 2 0 3 2 1 4 3 0 5 3 1 6 3 2 7 3 3 8 4 0 9 4 1 10 4 2 11 5 0 12 5 1 I tried expand.grid, but I

Hi, I encountered a booting problem with memdisk 2.83, USB and IBM Thinkpad T61, apparently the same issue as described here: http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2008-April/009850.html The boot process always stops after "Loading boot sector... booting...". With debug tracers enabled, the last few output lines are: Loading boot sector... FR<p>Dbooting...

Full_Name: Glenn Stone Version: 1.5.1 and 1.6.0 OS: win2000 Submission from: (NULL) (168.140.227.9) The following code produces incorrect fitted values in version 1.5.1 and an error in 1.6.0 Error in "contrasts<-"(*tmp*, value = "contr.treatment") : contrasts apply only to factors In addition: Warning message: variable ihalf is not a factor in:

OTOH, > sapply(1:9, function(i){ + sum(dfr$time <= quantile(dfr$time, 1./3., type = i)) + }) [1] 8 8 6 6 6 6 8 6 6 Only the default (type = 7) and the first two types give the result lines() gives now. I think there is plenty of reasons to give why any of the other 6 types might be better suited in Tukey's method. So to my mind, chaning the definition of line() to give sensible

A loose idea for *post*-0.50 development I've been giving a some (but not all that many) thoughts to whether some of the conceptual difficulties facing newcomers could be avoided by having simplified functions for common operations. We already have parts of this, e.g. in Kurts ctest routines. Specifically, I was thinking about data frames: How about

dear professor: thank you for your help,witn your help i develop the nomogram successfully. after that i want to do the internal validation to the model.i ues the bootpred to do it,and then i encounter problem again,just like that.(´íÎóÓÚerror to :complete.cases(x, y, wt) : ²»ÊÇËùÓеIJÎÊý¶¼Ò»Ñù³¤(the length of the augment was different)) i hope you tell me where is the mistake,and maybe i have