similar to: get list element names within lapply / sapply call

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "get list element names within lapply / sapply call"

2013 Mar 13
2
holding argument(s) fixed within lapply
|Hello, Given a function with several arguments, I would like to perform an lapply (or equivalent) while holding one or more arguments fixed to some common value, and I would like to do it in as elegant a fashion as possible, without resorting to wrapping a separate wrapper for the function if possible. Moreover I would also like it to work in cases where one or more arguments to the original
2007 Feb 21
1
Trying to get an apply to work with a list in applying names to tables
I am trying to use apply and a list to supply names to a set of tables I want to generate. Below is an example that I hope mimics the larger original problem. EXAMPLE aa <- c( 2,2,1,1,2) bb <- c(5,6,6,7,4) aan <- c("yes", "no") bbn <- c("a", "b", "c", "d") mynames <- c("abby", "billy") mylist <-
2018 Mar 13
0
Possible Improvement to sapply
Wouldn't that change how simplify='array' is handled? > str(sapply(1:3, function(x)diag(x,5,2), simplify="array")) int [1:5, 1:2, 1:3] 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ... > str(sapply(1:3, function(x)diag(x,5,2), simplify=TRUE)) int [1:10, 1:3] 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ... > str(sapply(1:3, function(x)diag(x,5,2), simplify=FALSE)) List of 3 $ : int [1:5, 1:2] 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
2007 Jun 22
2
extract index during execution of sapply
Hi there During execution of sapply I want to extract the number of times the function given to supply has been executed. I came up with: mylist <- list(a=3,b=6,c=9) sapply(mylist,function(x)as.numeric(gsub("[^0-9]","",deparse(substitute(x))))) This works fine, but looks quite ugly. I'm sure that there's a more elegant way to do this. Any suggestion? Christian
2018 Mar 13
1
Possible Improvement to sapply
You?re right, it sure does. My suggestion causes it to fail when simplify = ?array? From: William Dunlap [mailto:wdunlap at tibco.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:11 PM To: Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org> Cc: r-help at r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] Possible Improvement to sapply Wouldn't that change how simplify='array' is handled? > str(sapply(1:3,
2018 Mar 13
0
Possible Improvement to sapply
On 03/13/2018 09:23 AM, Doran, Harold wrote: > While working with sapply, the documentation states that the simplify argument will yield a vector, matrix etc "when possible". I was curious how the code actually defined "as possible" and see this within the function > > if (!identical(simplify, FALSE) && length(answer)) > > This seems superfluous to me,
2006 Feb 17
1
extracting a element with a name attribute from a list
Hi R users I like to extract (or collect) a numeric element with a name from a list. Is there any way to extract just a numeric element without the name attached to the element. For example, >mylist Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared test with continuity correction data: table(mydata[, x]) Mantel-Haenszel X-squared = 8.3832, df = 1, p-value = 0.003787 alternative hypothesis: true
2006 Mar 30
3
access list component names with lapply
I have a question regarding accessing the names of list components when applying a function with lapply. Here is an example that demonstrates what I'd like to do. I have a list like this one: mylist <- list(a=letters[1:10], b=letters[10:1], c=letters[1:3]) Now I would like to append the names of the list components to their corresponding vectors with the c() function. I thought this
2005 Nov 29
1
Indexing variables within lapply?
Hello I am using R 2.2.0 with Windows XP. I've got a five element list object, each element containing two dataframes of equivalent size. > str(mylist) List of 1 $ data1:List of 2 ..$ data1a :`data.frame': 77 obs. of 63 variables: .. ..$ var1 : num [1:77] 0.41375 0.00056 1.43040 1.43528 0.61730 ... .. ..$ var2 : num [1:77] 1.154 1.686 0.673 0.800 0.760 ... ..
2010 May 17
3
applying quantile to a list using values of another object as probs
Hi r-users, I have a matrix B and a list of 3x3 matrices (mylist). I want to calculate the quantiles in the list using each of the value of B as probabilities. The codes I wrote are: B <- matrix (runif(12, 0, 1), 3, 4) mylist <- lapply(mylist, function(x) {matrix (rnorm(9), 3, 3)}) for (i in 1:length(B)) { quant <- lapply (mylist, quantile, probs=B[i]) } But quant
2018 Mar 13
4
Possible Improvement to sapply
While working with sapply, the documentation states that the simplify argument will yield a vector, matrix etc "when possible". I was curious how the code actually defined "as possible" and see this within the function if (!identical(simplify, FALSE) && length(answer)) This seems superfluous to me, in particular this part: !identical(simplify, FALSE) The preceding
2009 Jul 21
0
Accessing list object from within a function as a list element
Hi - I have a list (call it 'mylist') with the following elements: (i) a function (call it 'myfunc' and expressed as 'mylist$myfunc') and (ii) a variable (call it 'myvar' and expressed as 'mylist$myvar'). Since I use mylist as a pseudo-class (I assign mylist to multiple different R objects), I would like to access the mylist R object from within the
2004 Feb 11
6
lapply and dynamically linked functions
Hi all, I'm trying to use lapply on a list with the following command: out<-lapply(mylist,myfun,par1=p,par2=d) (1) where myfun<-function(x,par1,par1) {.....} (2) now this function is in fact a wrapper for some Fortran code I have written so I think this might be the problem. When I call lapply() as in (1) I get the following message: Error in get(x,
2010 Mar 08
1
lapply and list indexing basics
I have split my original dataframe to generate a list of dataframes each of which has 3 columns of factors and a 4th column of numeric data. I would like to use lapply to apply the fitdistr() function to only the 4th column (x$isi) of the dataframes in the list. Is there a way to do this or am I misusing lapply? As a second solution I tried splitting only the numeric data column to yield a list
2018 Mar 13
2
Possible Improvement to sapply
Martin In terms of context of the actual problem, sapply is called millions of times because the work involves scoring individual students who took a test. A score for student A is generated and then student B and such and there are millions of students. The psychometric process of scoring students is complex and our code makes use of sapply many times for each student. The toy example used
2010 Jul 09
2
select columns from vector of column names
Hi I want to extract columns from a data frame using a vector with the desired column names. This short example uses the select argument in the subset function to accomplish what I am trying to do. Is there a better solution? #names of desired columns colnames <- c("col1","col3") #my data data <-
2012 Nov 09
5
using lapply with recode
Hello: Forgive me, this is surely a simple question but I can't figure it out, having consulted the help archives and "Data Manipulation With R" (Spector). I have a list of 11 data frames with one common variable in each (prov). I'd like to use lapply to go through and recode one particular level of that common variable. I can get the recode to work, but it only returns the
2018 Mar 13
1
Possible Improvement to sapply
Could your code use vapply instead of sapply? vapply forces you to declare the type and dimensions of FUN's output and stops if any call to FUN does not match the declaration. It can use much less memory and time than sapply because it fills in the output array as it goes instead of calling lapply() and seeing how it could be simplified. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Tue,
2004 Feb 26
3
my own function given to lapply
Hi It seems, I just miss something. I defined treshold <- function(pred) { if (pred < 0.5) pred <- 0 else pred <- 1 return(pred) } and want to use apply it on a vector sapply(mylist[,,3],threshold) but I get: Error in match.fun(FUN) : Object "threshold" not found thanks for help cheers chris -- Christoph Lehmann <christoph.lehmann at gmx.ch>
2018 Mar 13
0
Possible Improvement to sapply
Quite possibly, and I?ll look into that. Aside from the work I was doing, however, I wonder if there is a way such that sapply could avoid the overhead of having to call the identical function to determine the conditional path. From: William Dunlap [mailto:wdunlap at tibco.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:14 PM To: Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org> Cc: Martin Morgan <martin.morgan