similar to: unicode&pdf font problem

Just to add to this (I've been looking through the archive) problem with display unicode fonts in pdf document in R If you can use the Cairo package to create pdf on Mac, it seems quite happy with pushing unicode characters through (probably still font family dependant whether it will display) probstring <- c(' \u2264 0.2',' \u2268 0.4',' \u00FC 0.6',' \u2264

Hi, everyone. I need to run lm with the same response vector but with varying predictor vectors. (i.e. 1 response vector on each individual 6,000 predictor vectors) After looking through the R archive, I found roughly 3 methods that has been suggested. Unfortunately, I need to run this task multiple times(~ 5,000 times) and would like to find a faster way than the existing methods. All three

Hi, I was searching archives, manuals and web to solve usage of fonts with accents in R, but I was not succesfull. Had anybody solve problem with usage of fonts with accents (czech)? Thanks for advice, Jakub Zlamal -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send

> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 18:07:45 -0700 > From: RICK_@t-online.de =?ISO-8859-1?Q?(J=DCRGEN?= ANZER) > To: dszekely@csoft.ro > Subject: Re: WIN 98 password problem > Message-ID: <3627EDE1.38A@t-online.de> > > Szekely Denes wrote: > > > > Three days ago I had a mad ideea to install Win 98 on my PC. Until this > > date I cannot map or access from WINDOWS

Thank Denes for the clarification, glad to see my package got one citation from my own question:) Also, thank Benjamin for sending many useful documents. Actually, the question is related to the SharedObject package that Benjamin has pointed to. I wanna avoid sharing an object that has already been shared, so I need to check whether an object is an ALTREP that is defined in my package. Since the

I may be unusual but I don't find these examples surprising at all/ I don't think I would make these mistakes (maybe it's easier to make that mistake if you're used to a language where 'return' is a keyword rather than a function? My two cents would be that it would make more sense to (1) write code to detect these constructions in existing R code (I'm not good at

Without having dug into the details, it could be that one could update the parser by making a 'return' a keyword and require it to be followed by a parenthesis that optionally contains an expression followed by end of statement (newline or semicolon). Such a "promotion" of the 'return' statement seems backward compatible and would end up throwing syntax errors on:

On 20/11/2020 7:01 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote: > I may be unusual but I don't find these examples surprising at all/ > I don't think I would make these mistakes (maybe it's easier to make > that mistake if you're used to a language where 'return' is a keyword > rather than a function? > > My two cents would be that it would make more sense to (1) write

For years I used Deducer (Package Deducer) developed by Ian Fellows.? This is still available and partially remains mostly functional.? He was working on a new GUI years ago but appears no longer to be in the pipeline I think replaced by R-Studio. > Send R-help mailing list submissions to > r-help at r-project.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

On 5/1/20 11:09 PM, John Mount wrote: > Perhaps use the digest package? Isn't "R the R packages?" I think it is clear that I am aware of the existence of the digest package and also of other packages with similar functionality, e.g. the fastdigest package. (And I actually do use digest as I guess 99% percent of the R developers do at least as an indirect dependency.) The point

This is very nice to learn about, Denis, but it seems only fair to point out that the result of rbindlist is not a data frame. You can convert it to a data frame easily, but the copy and indexing semantics of data tables are quite different than data tables, which could be a real headache for someone not prepared for those differences. (To learn more, read the data tables vignette.) Tibbles (as

This question is better aimed at the r-help mailinglist as it is not about developing R itself. having said that, I can only gues why you want to do this, but why not do something like this: f <- function(...){ L <- list(...) len <- length() # you can stll pass the ... as follows: do.call(someotherfunction, L) } -Mark Op do 3 mei 2018 om 16:29 schreef D?nes T?th

In R-3.5.0 you can use ...length(): > f <- function(..., n) ...length() > f(stop("one"), stop("two"), stop("three"), n=7) [1] 3 Prior to that substitute() is the way to go > g <- function(..., n) length(substitute(...())) > g(stop("one"), stop("two"), stop("three"), n=7) [1] 3 R-3.5.0 also has the ...elt(n)

Note that substitute(...()) and substitute(someFunc(...))[-1] give slightly different results, the former a pairlist and the latter a call. > str((function(...)substitute(...()))(stop(1),stop(2),stop(3))) Dotted pair list of 3 $ : language stop(1) $ : language stop(2) $ : language stop(3) > str((function(...)substitute(someFunc(...))[-1])(stop(1),stop(2),stop(3))) language

> You happened to send a link which points to the OP's own package :) I > think Jiefei would like to know how one can "officially" determine if an > arbitrary ALTERP object belongs to a class that he owns. Argh, I am sorry! I did not notice that. My best bet for what I thought the question was is section 1.1.2 of R Internals where they note that: `unsigned int alt : 1; /* is

Yes, the behaviour of return() is absolutely consistent. I am wondering though how many experienced R developers would predict the correct return value just by looking at those code snippets. On 11/21/20 12:33 AM, Gabriel Becker wrote: > And the related: > > > f = function() stop(return("lol")) > > > f() > > [1] "lol" > >

As of 3.5.0 the ...length() function does exactly what you are asking for. Before that, I don't know of an easy way to get the length without evaluation via R code. There may be one I'm not thinking of though, I haven't needed to do this myself. Hope that helps. ~G On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Mark van der Loo <mark.vanderloo at gmail.com> wrote: > This question is

Hi! I'm new on the list, so please, be patient with me! I have a problem for wich I can't find the answer in the FAQ. Until recently I was running a 16 PC-s network with SCO OpenServer 5.0.4 and Samba 1.9.16p11 on the server and mixed clients (Win 3.11 to Win 95 OSR2). The users on the network have access to a PUBLIC directory on they own user directories on the server without

[Environment: Win Xp, Miktex 2.7, R 2.9.2] In an Sweave document, I'm displaying the results of car:::Anova() tests, that look like this in the generated .tex file: \begin{Soutput} Type III MANOVA Tests: Pillai test statistic Df test stat approx F num Df den Df Pr(>F) (Intercept) 1 0.86 90.38 4 60 <2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ?***? 0.001 ?**? 0.01 ?*? 0.05 ?.? 0.1 ? ? 1

Perhaps use the digest package? Isn't "R the R packages?" > On May 1, 2020, at 2:00 PM, D?nes T?th <toth.denes at kogentum.hu> wrote: > > > AFAIK there is no hashing utility in base R which can create hash digests of arbitrary R objects. However, as also described by Henrik Bengtsson in [1], we have tools::md5sum() which calculates MD5 hashes of files.