similar to: Rails 0.10.1: FCGI stability, WS generator, tons of fixes

Are you using Array#in_groups_of(n, false)? That is, you want the array chopped into n groups, and if its an uneven number, you want the missing positions filled with "false". If so, please post the brief snippet where it is being used. (I''m trying to settle a bet with Mr. koz.) -- David Heinemeier Hansson http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain

It''s been fifty days since our last confession, so it''s no wonder that this outpouring is by far the biggest yet in Rails history. It''s absolutely packed with goodies ranging from a whole new framework for sending email to the smallest new alias for an existing method. In total we''re just shy of 100 additions, changes, tweaks, and fixes. This is also

The cat is out of the bag, so here''s the full disclosure edition of the current security vulnerability. With Rails 1.1.0 through 1.1.5 (minus the short-lived 1.1.3), you can trigger the evaluation of Ruby code through the URL because of a bug in the routing code of Rails. This means that you can essentially take down a Rails process by starting something like /script/profiler, as the code

Since the WEBrick server has been so beefed up in Rails 0.9, I think it''s a darn shame that its lingering outside the support of custom pretty URLs. Also, it seems that the connection between mod_rewrite and url_for and friends is pretty fuzzy for most people. Hence, as we''ve talked about before, the rewriting of the url should be pulled in-house. There has been a few

There''s nothing like pushing a new major update in order to find bugs in the code when its exposed to a couple of hundred working applications. Thankfully the fixes were almost as swift as the reports. In any case, you''ll _definitely_ want to upgrade to 0.12.1 right away. There''s a good handful of fixes for both Action Pack and Active Record (mostly concerning the

We''re still hard at work on Rails 1.2, which features all the new dandy REST stuff and more, but a serious security concern has come to our attention that needed to be addressed sooner than the release of 1.2 would allow. So here''s Rails 1.1.5! This is a MANDATORY upgrade for anyone not running on a very recent edge (which isn''t affected by this). If you have a public

Rails 1.1 was a big upgrade with a lot of new features and we''ve been working hard since its release to polish off the kinks revealed after it was deployed to the masses. Rails 1.1.1 contains fixes for things like Prototype memory leaks in IE 6, Oracle adapter runnings, and a number of compatibility tweaks to make most older applications work. This release still doesn''t work

The cat is out of the bag, so here''s the full disclosure edition of the current security vulnerability. With Rails 1.1.0 through 1.1.5 (minus the short-lived 1.1.3), you can trigger the evaluation of Ruby code through the URL because of a bug in the routing code of Rails. This means that you can essentially take down a Rails process by starting something like /script/profiler, as the code

I''m trying to create an application that interfaces with the metaweblog API of a remote blog. I''ve installed a nifty little ruby module called "blog/client" and have it connecting, and then pulling posts from a blog via the metaweblog API if I put all the code into my controller. Now, I wanted to try and put the code into a model so that I can create a new connection

So apparently 1.8.4 is soon forthcoming. We need testing against it. Could someone help out with that? I believe Ara already checked into some of the issues, do you know if those are resolved, Ara? -- David Heinemeier Hansson http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain http://www.basecamphq.com -- Online project management http://www.backpackit.com -- Personal information manager

This is a correction to my previous message, I forgot to swap two lines in the body of setMakeGenericMethod. Sorry about that. The correct (full message) reads like this: Hi, This works > setGeneric("clear", function(obj) standardGeneric("clear")) [1] "clear" but this doesn't. Why? > funName <- "clear" > setGeneric(funName,

I have created the function prototype with the following code: const uintmax_t methodNameSize = 1024; const char methodNameTemplate[] = "llvm.memcpy.p0i%llu.p0i%llu.i%llu"; char methodName[methodNameSize]; // Create the methodName. memset(methodName, 0, methodNameSize); sprintf(methodName, methodNameTemplate, dstSize, srcSize, lengthSize); // Search for the

Hello i have some trouble getting my webservice to run . I have the following webservice : class DirectSpoolAPI < ActionWebService::API::Base api_method :add, :expects => [{:html=>:string},{:from=>:string}], :returns => [Customer] end class DirectSpoolService < ActionWebService::Base web_service_api DirectSpoolAPI def add(html,from) Customer.find(:first) end

I'm in the process of converting some S3 methods to S4 methods. I have this function : setGeneric("enrichmentCalc", function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...){standardGeneric("enrichmentCalc")}) setMethod("enrichmentCalc", c("GenomeDataList", "BSgenome"), function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...) { ... ... ... })

Been thinking about something lately and wanted to hear what others thought. After watching the video[1] of DHH with the slides[2] I really liked some of the ideas presented. Many people have noted the ugliness of needing secondary actions since HTTP actions do not cover the full range of CRUDness (i.e. the "GET /people;new" and "GET /people/1;edit"). Also the need for

Ok so DHH in the release post for Rails 2 talked about how there was clearly a side taken in the SOAP vs REST debate, and REST had one. So what does that mean if one is wanting to create a small blogging engine with Rails 2, and want''s to use an external blogging application to connect with it? Before it looked as if the Blogger API and MetaWeblog API were two ways of going

Instiki 0.9.2 has arrived. * The notorious "rollbacks by crawlers" bug fixed. * Instiki is distributed as a gem (experimental) * New maintainer (yours truly) * Assorted other minor changes Best regards, Alexey Verkhovsky ============= Don''t shoot the pianist, he''s doing his best README Path: README Last Update: Fri Jan 07 10:06:43

2006/6/28, Paul Barry <mail@paulbarry.com>: > Where can I find info about the "CRUD/resource-based features" that will be > in 1.2.0? In blogs. Especially about Railsconf and DHH''s keynotes. In trunk : http://dev.rubyonrails.org/browser/trunk/activeresource In DHH slides : Transcription of some slides from DHH''s talk at RubyKaigi 2006 (I suppose it must

I originally posted this to the xenapi mailing list but i dont think many are on there... here''s my question. My first attempt at this, trying to get php to interface with /var/run/xend/xen-api.sock (or even 127.0.0.1:9363 for that matter). I can make a connection to both the unix socket and the inet socket and write/read data. The problem is i always get the same responce back, also

| Ross Bamford wrote: | | On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:50:08 -0000, Thomas Leitner <thomas_leitner at | gmx.at> wrote [in comp.lang.ruby]: | | > I''m currently gathering ideas for new features for the next big | > webgen release (0.4.0). Some of the planned features are: | > | > * RSS feed generation (proposed by Friz Heinrichmeyer) | | That would be very nice -