similar to: function: colvolve

The example here puzzles me. It seems like the < operator doesn't work as expected. > l <- 0.6 > u <- seq(0.4, 0.7, 0.1) > u [1] 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 > mygrid <- expand.grid("l" = l, "u" = u) > mygrid l u 1 0.6 0.4 2 0.6 0.5 3 0.6 0.6 4 0.6 0.7 > mygridcollapsed <- mygrid[mygrid$l < mygrid$u, ] > mygridcollapsed l u 3 0.6 0.6 4

Dear R-ers, I have a list of data frames such that the length of the list is unknown in advance (it could be 1 or 2 or more). Each element of the list contains a data frame. I need to loop through all rows of the list element 1 AND (if applicable) of the list element 2 etc. and do something at each iteration. I am trying to figure out how to write a code that is generic, i.e., loops through the

Dear users, I'm working on binary classification problem using Support Vector Machines (SVM). My objective is to train a series of SVM models on a grid of hyperparameters and then select those that maximize the AUC based on an independent validation sample. My attempted code is shown below. It runs well on "small" data sets but when I use it on a slightly larger sample (e.g., my

To add to the wish-list for "convolve": For modeling processes that decay exponentially in time, e.g., fluorescence, it is desirable to have a function that convolves an arbitrary vector with an exponential using an iterative method. In the TIMP package (which won't be on CRAN till R 2.5.0 is official, but is for now at www.nat.vu.nl/~kate/TIMP) we implemented this special-purpose

I have been experimenting with convolve(). What I know about convolution I learned from engineering (they call this stuff linear systems theory), not statistics, so maybe this is all just a matter of different conventions. BUT I notice very weird things with convolve(). 1. First example, from the classic Bracewell The Fourier transform and its applications, chap 3 (p.32 in 2nd edition): {2 2 3 3

Dear R People: Here is something that I am sure is very simple. I'm just trying to re-create the C convolution example in the Extensions manual. Here is the subroutine: void convolve(double *a, int *na, double *b, int *nb, double *ab) { R_len_t i, j, nab = *na + *nb - 1; for(i = 0; i < nab; i++) ab[i] = 0.0; for(i = 0; i < *na; i++) for(j = 0; j < *nb; j++) ab[i + j] += a[i] *

Dear R users, I want to call C code via the .C or .Call interface. This works fine with integer values but using doubles the array received in C will be set to zeros. I have tried the convolve examples (Writing R extensions, chapter 5.2) and still the resulting array consists of zeros. My code (shortened for my purposes. Original did not work either):

We obtained some disturbing results from convolve() (inaccuracies and negative probabilities). We'll try to make the context clear in as few lines as possible... Our function panjer() (code below) basically computes recursively the probability mass function of a compound Poisson distribution. When the Poisson parameter lambda is very large, the starting value of the recursive scheme ---

Hi, I compiled a C program file on Borland C++ 5.5 compiler to get one dll output (as instructed in the file readme.package). The C program file is just the example on page 31 of "writing R extensions": void convolve(double *a, int *na, double *b, int *nb, double *ab) { int i, j, nab = *na + *nb - 1; for(i = 0; i < nab; i++) ab[i] = 0.0; for(i = 0; i < *na; i++) for(j = 0; j

Hi, Man page for 'convolve' says: conj: logical; if 'TRUE', take the complex _conjugate_ before back-transforming (default, and used for usual convolution). The complex conjugate of 'x', of 'y', of both? In fact it seems that it takes the complex conjugate of 'y' only which is OK but might be worth mentioning because (1) conj=TRUE is the

Hi, the function stats::convolve does not mention efficient usage of the underlying FFT algorithm, such as (a) if type="circular", then length(x)=length(y) should have many factors (e.g. length(x) = length(y) = 2^n) (b) if type="open" or "filter", then length(x)+length(y)-1 should have many factors (e.g. length(x)+length(y)-1 = 2^n) In particular the latter may

Hi, I'm new to R, and I'm a bit confused with the "convolve()" function. If I do: x<-c(1, 2, 3) convolve(x, rev(x), TRUE, "open") = 9 12 10 4 1 But I expected: 3 8 14 8 3 (like in Octave/MATLAB - conv(x, reverse(x)) ) 3 2 1 x 1 2 3 = 3 2 1 0 6 4 2 0 0 9 6 3 = 3 8 14 8 3 The thing is, that "convolve(x, x, TRUE, "open")" works. For me

Dear R-ophiles, I've found something very odd when I apply convolve to ever larger vectors. Here is an example below with vectors ranging from 2^11 to 2^17. There is a funny bump up at 2^12. Then it gets very slow at 2^16. > for( i in 11:20 )print( system.time(convolve(1:2^i,1:2^i,type="o"))) user system elapsed 0.002 0.000 0.002 user system elapsed 0.373

Hi, I am happy to announce that I finished the translation of almost all LGPL'ed R headerfiles to Delphi. As a test I did several demos which basically contain delphized versions of all the examples of chapter 5 in "Writing R Extensions". Please have a look in the attachments for details (DemosAndHeaders.txt), more information (Readme.txt) and an example of how it looks

Dear all, I have an image that I need to filter, and so I'm looking for a method to convolve it with a matrix. If I understood the docs for convolve correctly, it only works in 1D (and I have tried to convolve, it didn't look good). So, I wondered if anybody have implemented 2D convolution in R, or have any good advices to share (beyond having a look at mvfft), before I go hacking?

I have received a few private emails asking for some simple demonstration of calling Java code from R using the rJava package (which can be installed directly inside R). Here is one example for convolving two vectors (an example in the R manual about linking C with R). First write a Java program public class my_convolve { public static double[] convolve(double[] a, double[] b)

Full_Name: Bill Simpson Version: 65.1 , 0.90.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (193.62.250.209) I reported this on r-help, but here is official bug report. The present convolve() does not do convolution by default. Its default behaviour is correlation. This is a bug. The default argument conj should be set to FALSE. The zero-padding should be on the right for linear convolution (don't

Dear all, I'm studing how to include .c code in my .r functions . In the R-exts.pdf manual I have found the following code. At one point the author write "called from R by"... How can I load a .c file on R? ( I am using a xp windows as so.) Thank you ale void convolve(double *a, int *na, double *b, int *nb, double *ab) { int i, j, nab = *na + *nb - 1; for(i = 0; i < nab; i++)

Hi all, i have some problem in using shared objects. I tried the example found in "Writing R Extension", pg. 33 I used the .c file prova.c : ------------------------------------------------------------------- #include <R.h> #include <Rinternals.h> void convolve(double *a, int *na, double *b, int *nb, double *ab) { int i, j , nab = *na + *nb - 1; for (i = 0; i < nab;

Jeff Brown wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to learn to use .C, which lets one invoke compiled C code from > within R. To do that, one has to first get the C code into R as a shared > object, which (I think) means first compiling it (with COMPILE or SHLIB) > and then loading it (with dyn.load()). > I would suggest taking it a step further and building an R package