similar to: reshape is re-ordering my variables

I reported earlier that I was getting a lot of error messages out of Wine running Family Tree Maker. As requested I updated to the beta version of Wine, but since doing so nobody has responded with any followup. I now find that after running FTM for a long period of time that Wine hangs up. This suggests to me that there is a memory leak in the beta version. When I terminate the application,

Hi all I am trying to build an R package, which I have successfully done many times before, but have an error I cannot trace. I hope someone can help me. Here's is some edited output (full output below if it is useful): pdunn2 at PDunnUbuntu:~/DSdata$ R CMD build GLMsData * checking for file 'GLMsData/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * preparing 'GLMsData': * checking DESCRIPTION

Hello, I'm having troubles with writing a pass. In my pass I've have created a function that has two parameters - both of type i8*. Initially I wrote this function in C, that I translated it into IR, and then by using llc -march=cpp I got it's implementation in cpp code that actually inserts IR instructions. Then, I inserted this cpp code in my pass. And in some places of a program

Dear R experts: I just tried some simple test that told me that hand computing the OLS coefficients is about 3-10 times as fast as using the built-in lm() function. (code included below.) Most of the time, I do not care, because I like the convenience, and I presume some of the time goes into saving a lot of stuff that I may or may not need. But when I do want to learn the properties of an

Hi all, I am working on my Master's project in security and I am trying to iterate over the argument list of the function. Basically I need to do following things : 1. Check data type of each argument of the argument list of the function. 2. Based on its data type like character array or integer array, pointer, int, char, take different action. 3. I have added following code to check its

Hi All, I've written a custom udev rule to change the permissions of /dev/ttyS* but it doesn't seem to be working at boot up. If I run /sbin/udevcontrol reload_rules; udevtrigger The rules are parsed, applied and the permissions are then correct but why is it not doing so at boot? The file in questions I've called /etc/udev/rules.d/49-udev-override.rules and it contains

On 2/25/13 1:44 PM, teja tamboli wrote: > Hi all, > > I am working on my Master's project in security and I am trying to > iterate over the argument list of the function. Basically I need to do > following things : Interesting. Just out of curiosity, can you tell us what your project is about? > > 1. Check data type of each argument of the argument list of the

Dear R Helpers, A few weeks ago I asked for some help on how to accomplish modifications to data in a set of data frames. As part of that request I mentioned that I realized that one way to accomplish my goal was to put the data frames together in a list but that I was looking for a way to do it with data frames and a loop because I "believe the better thing is to work df by df for my

Hi, I have a question about how to obtain the union of several data frame rows. I'm trying to create a common key for several tests composed of different items. Here is a small scale version of the problem. These are keys for 4 different tests, not all mutually exclusive: id q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 1 A C 2 B D 3 A D B 4 C D B D I would like

I am comparing two different algorithms in terms of speed and memory usage. I can calculate the processing time with proc.time() as follows but am not sure how to calculate the memory usage. ptm <- proc.time() x <- rnorm(1000000) proc.time() - ptm I would like to be within R itself since I will test the algorithm several hundred times and in batch mode. So manually looking up

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > Here's what works now, and I have a separate test case for each of these: > > statement functions > intrinsic functions (print, cos, etc) > loops, goto statments > scalarized array operations > function calls with *no arguments* > simple common blocks Great! > Function calls with more than one argument don't work.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Silvano" <silvano at uel.br> To: <r-help at r-project.org> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 9:07 AM Subject: Tables and merge > Hi, > > I have 21 files which is common variable CODE. > Each file refers to a question. > > I would like to join the 21 files into one, to construct > tables for each question by CODE. >

Dear R People: I'm building a packages on an Ubuntu Karmic Koala 9.10 system and am getting the following errors: * checking PDF version of manual ... WARNING LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. LaTeX errors found: ! Font T1/ptm/m/n/10=ptmr8t at 10.0pt not loadable: Metric (TFM) file not found . <to be read again> relax l.7

The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at all, so I had to work from my own sample codes, and generate test cases from them. Here's what works now, and I have a separate test case for each of these: statement functions intrinsic functions (print, cos, etc) loops, goto statments scalarized array operations function calls with *no arguments* simple common

The first buildbot failure I can readily find was Monday, 26oct2009 around 7PM PDT. The assertion is Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"), function init, file /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/

Dear All, I'm getting the following error building mainline llvm-gcc 4.2 (LLVM and llvm-gcc are up to date): cc1: /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp:290: void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::Value*, llvm::Value*): Assertion `(FTy->getNumParams() == 1 || (FTy->isVarArg() && FTy->getNumParams() == 0)) && "Calling a function with bad

Hi Team, I am migrating one of the Pass that was written for llvm2.2 or older to llvm3.1. The code snippet looks like the following: Constant *func; void add( Module *M) { func = M->getOrInsertFunction("func", Type::getVoidTy(M->getContext()), NULL); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { add (&M); for(Module::iterator F = M.begin(), E = M.end(); F !=

Hi everyone, I am trying to have an call instruction that calls global variable The first thing I do is gv = new llvm::GlobalVariable( *(tb->getModule()), fty, false,GlobalValue::InternalLinkage,0, "",0,0,0); fty : i32 ({ i32, [32 x i32] }*) I get stuck here, the fifth argument is the

Hi! I have this error while building my code: Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!") Actually I'm trying to load functions from .bc file and use them in the code that I'm building with IRBuilder. I found that function parameter type is %struct.reValue* and

[I am herewith re-posting this message on R-devel, as it seems to be the most appropriate mailing list for this issue.] Dear List, >From what I understand, strptime() simply converts from one class representation to another; i.e., from character to POSIXct/POSIXlt. One strange feature of this command running on Linux is that there are repeated calls to system time (as was revealed