similar to: removed data is still there!

I require some help in debugging this code  library(neuralnet) ir<-read.table(file="iris_data.txt",header=TRUE,row.names=NULL) ir1 <- data.frame(ir[1:100,2:6]) ir2 <- data.frame(ifelse(ir1$Species=="setosa",1,ifelse(ir1$Species=="versicolor",0,""))) colnames(ir2)<-("Output") ir3 <- data.frame(rbind(ir1[1:4],ir2))

Hey Duncan, Hard to debug? That's an understatement. Eyes bleeding.... In any case, I tried all your suggestions. To get "integer" for the final column, I had to change the code to get integers instead of strings. double[] d1 = ((REXPVector) ((RList) tableRead).get(0)).asDoubles(); double[] d2 = ((REXPVector) ((RList) tableRead).get(1)).asDoubles(); double[] d3 = ((REXPVector)

Thanks Duncan. Awesome ideas! I think we're getting closer! I tried what you suggested and got a possibly better error... . . . rConnection.assign("boxMVariable", myDf); String resultBV = "str(boxMVariable)"; // your suggestion. RESULTING ERROR: Error in format.default(nam.ob, width = max(ncn), justify = "left") : invalid 'width' argument (No idea

Thanks Duncan. I can't tell you how helpful all your terrific replies have been. I think the biggest surprise is that nobody appears to be using Java and R together like I"m trying to do. I suppose it should be a surprise since there are no books on the subject and almost no technical documentation other than a few sites here and there. ----- I originally had the "int" as the

Hi there: I have a question about generating mean value of a data.frame. Take iris data for example, if I have a data.frame looking like the following: --------------------- Sepal.Length Sepal.Width Petal.Length Petal.Width Species 1 5.1 3.5 1.4 0.2 setosa 2 4.9 3.0 1.4 0.2

I have a dataset and I wish to use two different models to predict. Both models are SVM. The reason for two different models is based on the sex of the observation. I wish to be able to make predictions and have the results be in the same order as my original dataset. To illustrate I will use iris: # Take Iris and create a dataframe of just two Species, setosa and versicolor, shuffle them

I'm not sure what you mean. Could you please be more specific? If I print the string, I get: boxM(boxMVariable[, -5], boxMVariable[, 5]) From this code: . . . // assign the data to a variable.rConnection.assign("boxMVariable", myDf); // create a string command with that variable name.String boxVariable = "boxM(boxMVariable[, -5], boxMVariable[, 5])";

Hi, I was wondering if it is possible to get the rowindices without using the function "which" because I don't have a restriction criteria. Here's an example of what I mean: # take 10 randomly selected instances iris[sample(1:nrow(iris), 10),] # output Sepal.Length Sepal.Width Petal.Length Petal.Width Species 76 6.6 3.0 4.4 1.4

Just out of curiosity, I took the default "iris" example in the RF helpfile... but seeing the admonition against using the formula interface for large data sets, I wanted to play around a bit to see how the various options affected the output. Found something interesting I couldn't find documentation for... Just like the example... > set.seed(12) # to be sure I have

Greetings R experts, I'm having some difficulty recovering lda objects that I've saved within sublists using the save.image() function. I am running a script that exports a variety of different information as a list, included within that list is an lda object. I then take that list and create a list of that with all the different replications I've run. Unfortunately I've been

Hi All, OK, in the "back to the drawing board" department, I found what looks like a much better solution to using R in Java. Renjin. Looking at the docs and then trying a quick example, didn't quite work. Of course I'm missing something. Although I'm telling the engine to require ("biotools") just like I would in R itself, when I get to the line of code that

It can't be this hard, right? I really need a shove in the right direction here. Been spinning wheels for three days. Cannot get past the errors. I'm doing something wrong, obviously, since I can easily compute the Box's M right there in RStudio But I don't see what is wrong below with the coding equivalent. The entire code snippet is below. The code fails below on the call to

Dear R users, I have a question on the confusion matrix generated by function randomForest. I used the entire data set to generate the forest, for example: > print(iris.rf) Call: randomForest(formula = Species ~ ., data = iris, importance = TRUE, keep.forest = TRUE) confusion setosa versicolor virginica class.error setosa 50 0 0 0.00

Dear R-help, This is about randomForest's handling of NA and NaNs in test set data. Currently, if the test set data contains an NA or NaN then predict.randomForest will skip that row in the output. I would like to change that behavior to outputting an NA. Can this be done with flags to randomForest? If not can some sort of wrapper be built to put the NAs back in? thanks, Clayton

If do: > library("e1071") > example(svm) I get: svm> data(iris) svm> attach(iris) svm> ## classification mode svm> # default with factor response: svm> model <- svm(Species ~ ., data = iris) svm> # alternatively the traditional interface: svm> x <- subset(iris, select = -Species) svm> y <- Species svm> model <- svm(x, y) svm>

Hopefully I will not be flamed for this on the list, but I am starting out with R and having some trouble with combining plots. I am playing with the famous iris dataset (checking out example dataset in R while reading through Introduction to datamining) What I would like to do is create three graphs (combined boxplots) besides each other for each of the three species (Setosa, Versicolour and

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 6:43 PM, Rui Barradas <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt> wrote: > Hello, > > Not exactly an answer but here it goes. > If you use the formula interface the names will be retained. Also if you pass named arguments: aggregate(iris["Sepal.Length"], by = iris["Species"], FUN = foo) # Species Sepal.Length # 1 setosa 5.006 # 2

I try to perform a clustering using an existing dissimilarity matrix that I calculated using distance (analogue) I tried two different things. One of them worked and one not and I don`t understand why. Here the code: not working example library(cluster) library(analogue) iris2<-as.data.frame(iris) str(iris2) 'data.frame': 150 obs. of 5 variables: $ Sepal.Length: num 5.1 4.9 4.7

In the examples below, the first loses the name attached by foo(), the second retains names attached by bar(). Is this an intentional difference? I?d prefer that the names be retained in both cases. foo <- function(x) { c(mean = base::mean(x)) } bar <- function(x) { c(mean = base::mean(x), sd = stats::sd(x))} aggregate(iris$Sepal.Length, by = list(iris$Species), FUN = foo) #>

Hi R People: Several of you pointed out that using "tapply" on a data frame will work on the iris data frame. I'm still having a problem. The iris data frame has 150 rows, 5 variables. The first 4 are numeric, while the last is a factor, which has the Species names. I can use tapply for 1 variable at a time: >tapply(iris[,1],iris[,5],mean) setosa versicolor virginica