similar to: lapack in R 2.11.1 (Ubuntu 10.04.1)

Dear R-devel: The Cluster administrators at KU got enthusiastic about testing R-3.2.2 with Intel MKL when I asked for some BLAS integration. Below I forward a performance report, which is encouraging, and thought you would like to know the numbers. Appears to my untrained eye there are some extraordinary speedups on Cholesky decomposition, determinants, and matrix inversion. They had

Dear R, I'm doing some simulation work and it takes me a lot of time to do it in R. So I try to implement it in C code, but I want to use some R functions directly for my lazy and the robustness of code. For example, I will use lm and nlm in my program. How could I use R's lm and nlm function directly? I thinks these functions are not included in the R's include directory. Do I need

I am unable to install package lme4, after several attempts to do so using various repository URLs. Just to make sure everything works fine with proxy, connection, etc, I installed ggplot2 and it worked fine. I am using command install.packages("lme4", lib="/myRlibs"), optionally using contrib argument with different URLs. Error message the I get is Warning message; In

Hi, I can not install packages from source which links to RcppArmadillo on Ubuntu 20.04 (after upgrading from 18.04). The following problem occurs: ** testing if installed package can be loaded from temporary location Error: package or namespace load failed for 'myPackage' in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...): unable to load shared object

Sorry for re-posting, but the original one ended up inside a previous and unrelated thread. -- Matias ----- Hello, This simple SVD calculation (commands are copied immediately below) crashes on my Ubuntu machine (R 2.13.0). However it works fine on my Windows 7 machine, so I suspect there's a problem with (my?) Ubuntu and / or R. Can anybody else reproduce it (with Ubuntu 11.04)? Thanks

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:02 PM, <rcpp-devel-request at r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at> wrote: > I was able to write a very short C++ function using the Rcpp package > that provided about a 1000-fold increase in speed relative to the best > I could do in R. ?I don't have the script on this computer so I will > post it tomorrow when I am back on the computer at the office. > >

Hi, During my recent r2sundials development, I've came across a strange test failing during 'R CMD check' exclusively on win R-devel which I could reproduce with a minimal example that I present here. The toy packages testarma1 [1] and testarma2 [2] are minimal modifications of a skeleton package produced by RcppArmadillo.package.skeleton(). They are almost identical. The first

What is the RcppArmadillo way to make binomial draws from a vector of probs, similar to what rbinom does in R? Thanx! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/rbinom-in-RcppArmadillo-tp4683593.html Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, Why doesn't R include a full Lapack but only a subset? My cda package (now archived) relying on RcppArmadillo has broken multiple times on CRAN over the past few years following updates in the underlying Armadillo library, Every time it follows the same pattern: Armadillo adds a function to solve a specialised linear system more efficiently, and the corresponding Lapack routine is not

Hi Paul, We've been through this process ourselves for the Revolution R Open project. There are a number of pitfalls to avoid, but you can take a look at how we achieved it in the build scripts at: https://github.com/RevolutionAnalytics/RRO There are also some very useful notes in the R Installation guide: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-admin.html#BLAS Most packages do

Dear all, running the example by D. Eddebuettel (http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2011/04/23/) I get an error message. Specifically, the R code I was taking from the above example is ### BEGIN EXAMPLE ### suppressMessages(require(RcppArmadillo)) suppressMessages(require(Rcpp)) suppressMessages(require(inline)) code <- ' arma::mat coeff = Rcpp::as<arma::mat>(a); arma::mat

Dear All, When I run rlm to obtain robust standard errors, my output does not include p-values. Is there any reason p-values should not be used in this case? Is there an argument I could use in rlm so that the output does include p-values? Thanks in advance, Celso [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On a cluster that is based on RedHat 6.2, we are updating to R-3.3.1. I have, from time to time, run into problems with various R packages and some older versions of GCC. I wish we had newer Linux in the cluster, but with 1000s of nodes running 1000s of jobs, well, they don't want a restart. Administrator suggested I try to build with the GCC that is provided with the nodes, which is

Hello, I'm very new to R so my apologies if I'm making an obvious mistake. I have a data frame with ~170k rows and 14 numeric variables. The first 2 of those variables (let's call them group1 and group2) are used to define groups: each unique pair of (group1,group2) is a group. There are roughly 50k such unique groups, with sizes varying from 1 through 40 rows each. My objective is

Dear all, I am testing a simple C++ function that takes a double matrix as argument and which uses routines provided by the C++ Armadillo package. I am aware of the nice capabilities of Rcpp and RcppArmadillo which helps simplifying a lot and that I have already successfully tested. However, I had a hard time trying to figure out how the coercion from a REALSPX matrix to an arma::mat =

Dear R-devel people, We are working to submit a package which is mainly a binding over a C++ lib (https://github.com/libKriging) using armadillo. It is _not_ a standard RcppArmadillo package, because we also had to provide a python binding... so there is a huge layer of cmake & scripting to make it work with a standard armadillo (but using same version that RcppArmadillo). It seems now

Dirk, thank you a thousand times. Indeed, src/Makevars was wrong. I modified Makevars so that now looks like the below and the package now compiled and linked properly. CXX_STD = CXX11 PKG_LIBS += $(SHLIB_OPENMP_CXXFLAGS) $(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS) $(FLIBS) $(shell ${R_HOME}/bin/Rscript -e "RcppParallel::RcppParallelLibs()") PKG_CXXFLAGS = $(SHLIB_OPENMP_CXXFLAGS) -I../inst/include

Le 10/01/2023 ? 10:44, RICHET Yann a ?crit?: > Dear R-devel people, > > We are working to submit a package which is mainly a binding over a C++ lib (https://github.com/libKriging) using armadillo. > It is _not_ a standard RcppArmadillo package, because we also had to provide a python binding... so there is a huge layer of cmake & scripting to make it work with a standard armadillo

Hi, The following code, from Angelo Canty article on line "Resampling Methods in R: the boot Package, 2002", works fine for Angelo Canty using R 2.6.0 on Windows XP. It also works for me using R 1.2.1 and S-PLUS 2000 on Windows XP after installing the S-PLUS bootstrap library, with slight differences in my outputs. > library(boot) > library(survival) >

The Rcpp package and some related packages such as RcppArmadillo make use of (local) wrappers around the utils::package.skeleton() function for creating (basic yet functional) packages using Rcpp or RcppArmadillo. RStudio also exposes this under the graphical menu as a nice way to construct a package. But it seems that something changed quite recently in R. I looked into this a little yesterday