similar to: stratified Wilcoxon's rank sum test with the locally best weights

Dear All, is there a stratified version of the Wilcoxon test (also known as van Elteren test) available in R? I could find it in the survdiff function of the survival package for censored data. I think, it should be possible to use this function creating a dummy censoring indicator and setting it to not censored, but may be there is a better way to perform the test. Thanks, Heinz T??chler

Hi everyone! I need to perform a Wilcoxon rank sum test, but I have some ties and the groups have different size also. When I deal with ties I use the wilcox.exact function, how can I solve the different size problem using this function? thanks net -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Wilcoxon-rank-sum-in-unbalanced-design-tp3447400p3447400.html Sent from the R help

Dear, I'm using R software to evaluate Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test and I' getting one Warning message as this: > C1dea_com [1] 1.000 0.345 0.200 0.208 0.508 0.480 0.545 0.563 0.451 0.683 0.380 0.913 1.000 0.506 > C1dea_sem [1] 1.000 0.665 0.284 0.394 0.509 0.721 0.545 0.898 0.744 0.683 0.382 0.913 1.000 0.970 > wilcox.test(C1dea_sem,C1dea_com, paired = TRUE, alternative =

Hello, I am hoping someone could shed some light into the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for me? In looking through Stats references, the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test are statistically equivalent. When using the following dataset: m <- c(2.0863,2.1340,2.1008,1.9565,2.0413,NA,NA) f <- c(1.8938,1.9709,1.8613,2.0836,1.9485,2.0630,1.9143) and the wilcox.test command as

Hi there, I'm a total newbie to R. I'd like to use a Wilcoxon Rank Sum test to compare two populations of values. Further, I'd like to do this simultaneously for 114 sets of values. The two populations are C and N. The different sets of values have arbitrary names (I'll call them a, b, c etc). The set-up is as follows: a b c d .... C 2 C 3 C 5 C 9 C 4

An earlier post had posed the question: "Does anybody know what is relation between 'T' value calculated by 'wilcox_test' function (coin package) and more common 'W' value?" I found the question interesting and ran the commands in R and SPSS. The W reported by R did not seem to correspond to either Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon W or the Z which I have more

Dear all, I am trying to run Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test with Bonferroni's correction. I have two lists: l0, l1: mapply(function(x,y)wilcox.test(x,y)$p.value, l0, l1) How do I run Bonferroni's correction on mapply? Any help is much apperciated. Thanks, -Raj

How does R compute the p-value in the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test? If I have the test statistics, can I get the p-value using the function pwilcox? Thanks -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the

Hello Everyone,   I'm trying to conduct a couple of power analyses and was hoping someone might be able to help. I want to estimate the sample size that would be necessary to adequately power a couple of non-inferiority tests. The first would be a log-rank test and the second would be a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. I want to be able to determine the sample size that would be necessary to test for a

Dear All, I was writing a small wrapper to bootstrap a classification algorithm, but if we generate the indices in the "usual way" as: bootindex <- sample(index, N, replace = TRUE) there is a non-zero probability that all the samples belong to only one class, thus leading to problems in the fitting (or that some classes will end up with only one sample, which will be a problem

>Hello, I am hoping for assistance in regards to examining the contribution of stratified variables in a cox regression. A previous post by Terry Therneau noted that "That is the point of a strata; you are declaring a variable to NOT be proportional hazards, and thus there is no single "hazard ratio" that describes it". Given this purpose of stratification, in the

Hi All, I'm using R's randomForest package (and it's quite awesome!) but I'd really like to do some stratified sampling with a regression problem. However, it appears that the package was designed to only accommodate stratified sampling for classification purposes (see https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2006-November/117477.html). As Andy suggests in the link just

This is a follow-up to a query that was posted regarding some problems that emerge when running anova analyses for cox models, posted by Mathias Gondan: Matthias Gondan wrote: >* Dear List,*>**>* I have tried a stratified Cox Regression, it is working fine, except for*>* the "Anova"-Tests:*>**>* Here the commands (should work out of the box):*>**>*

Hi all: For stratified count data,how to perform regression analysis? My data: age case oc count 1 1 1 21 1 1 2 26 1 2 1 17 1 2 2 59 2 1 1 18 2 1 2 88 2 2 1 7 2 2 2 95 age: 1:<40y 2:>40y case: 1:patient 2:health oc: 1:use drug 2:not use drug My purpose: Anaysis whether case and

Dear all, I used cph() function from Frank harrell's Design package to create a survival model, then used functions 'Function' and 'sascode' to generate prediction equation based on the saved survival model. But it failed. I included a stratified variable in the model. If I removed the stratification, they were working well. Does that mean that function 'Function'

Hi, Has anyone done (or know of) any nice R activities that help introductory students ( and teachers :) ) better understand the concepts of simple vs stratified vs cluster sampling? Any links? David -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/SRS-Stratified-and-Cluster-sampling-tp4655099.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear List, I have tried a stratified Cox Regression, it is working fine, except for the "Anova"-Tests: Here the commands (should work out of the box): library(survival) d = colon[colon$etype==2, ] m = coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ strata(sex) + rx, data=d) summary(m) # Printout ok anova(m, test='Chisq') This is the output of the anova command: > Analysis of Deviance Table

Dear R-List,   I would like to have a large number of stratified random subsamples drawn from my dataframe and automatically test for correlation differences in every subsample.   Let this be my dataframe   df<-data.frame(group=c(rep(1,5),rep(2,5),rep(3,5)),a=c(3,4,5,6,3,4,5,4,5,4,1,2,1,2,1),b=c(1,2,3,4,5,3,4,3,4,5,6,5,6,2,3),c=c(2,2,3,3,5,1,1,6,6,5,6,1,1,2,1))   Then I would like to have n

Dear R community, I have data on beta&standard error (for the main effect of variable x), stratified by sex for my dataset. I wish to calculate the sex-interaction effect (as beta&se) from these two stratified datasets. Is there a package to do this? If not, any advice how to do it manually? Thank you very much and best regards, Georg. ************************ Georg Ehret, JHU,

I?m trying to set up proportional hazard model that is stratified with respect to covariate 1 and has an interaction between covariate 1 and another variable, covariate 2. Both variables are categorical. In the following, I try to illustrate the two problems that I?ve encountered, using the lung dataset. The first problem is the warning: To me, it seems that there are too many dummies