similar to: relative risk regression with survey data

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "relative risk regression with survey data"

2008 Aug 06
1
Warning when using survey:::svyglm
Howdy, Referencing the below exchange: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2006-April/103862.html I am still getting the same warning ("non-integer #successes in a binomial glm!") when using svyglm:::survey. Using the API data: library(survey) data(api) #stratified sample dstrat<-svydesign(id=~1,strata=~stype, weights=~pw, data=apistrat, fpc=~fpc)
2011 Jul 04
1
Contrastes con el paquete survey (svycontrast)
Estimados usuarios: Estoy intentando reproducir el ejemplo 6.4 de Thomas Lumley. Complex Survey. Editorial Wiley. 2010 (ver la página en google:
2008 Feb 13
1
survey package: proportion estimate confidence intervals using svymean
Using the survey package I find it is convenient and easy to get estimated proportions using svymean, and their corresponding estimated standard errors. But is there any elegant/simple way to calculate corresponding confidence intervals for those proportions? Of course +/- 1.96 s.e. is a reasonable approximation for a 95% CI, but (incorrectly) assumes symmetrical distribution for a proportion.
2012 Feb 13
1
survey package svystat objects from predict()
Hello, I'm running R 2.14.1 on OS X (x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit)), with version 3.28 of Thomas Lumley's survey package. I was using predict() from svyglm(). E.g.: data(api) dstrat<-svydesign(id=~1,strata=~stype, weights=~pw, data=apistrat, fpc=~fpc) out <- svyglm(sch.wide~ell+mobility, design=dstrat, family=quasibinomial()) pred.df <-
2012 Jun 21
4
crosstable and regression for survey data (weighted)
I have survey data that I am working on. I need to make some multi-way tables and regression analyses on the data. After attaching the data, this is the code I use for tables for four variables (sweight is the weight variable): > a <- xtabs(sweight~research.area + gender + a2n2 + age) > tmp <- ftable(a) Is this correct? I don't think I need to use the strata and cluster
2017 Jul 05
2
Svyglm Error
Greetings, I am revisiting code from several different files I have saved from the past and all used to run flawlessly; now when I run any of the svyglm related functions, I am coming up with an error: Error in model.frame.default(formula = F3ATTAINB ~ F1PARED, data = data, : the ... list does not contain 4 elements The following is a minimal reproducible example: library(RCurl)
2012 Jul 25
1
(no subject)
hello I want to know why when I use the function "svyglm" for a logistic regression I get the AIC: NA. The code and the result is mestran below: mod2<-svyglm(APES_DICOT~Nivel_Educativo+Ocupacion_principal+Afiliacion_salud+Tiene_cuidador+Presencia_enfer_cronica+ Consumo_tabaco+Consumo_alcohol+Presencia_Dolor+ABC_fis+ABC_instr+Anergia+Actividad_fisica_ultimo_año+
2012 Aug 02
1
summary(svyglm) Pr (> | t |) ?
Hello I want to know if the summary of the logistic model with survey Pr (> | t |) to test if the coefficient of the model is significant, ie is the p_valor wald test for the model coefficients, for I am interested to know if the three levels of the variable educational level are significant to the model (significance of handling 0.2), I present below the results of my model
2012 Feb 12
1
how to extract p values in svyglm
summary(result) Call: svyglm(Injury ~ seat, sD, family = quasibinomial(link = "logit")) Survey design: svydesign(~1, prob = NULL, strata = Data[, 1], weights = Data[, 4], data = Data, fpc = ~fPc) Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -4.256875 0.001421 -2996.7 <2e-16 *** seatbad 0.681504 0.001689 403.4 <2e-16 *** ---
2009 Oct 20
2
Weighted Logistic Regressions using svyglm
I?m running some logistic regressions and I?ve been trying to include weights in the equation. However, when I run the model, I get this warning message: Here?s what it says: Warning message: In eval(expr, envir, enclos) : non-integer #successes in a binomial glm! I think it is because the weights are non-integer values. What is a good way to run logistic regressions in R when using
2012 Jul 27
2
How can I access an element of a string?
Dear Daniel and Jorge, Thank you very much and it does help. If I have a string "ABCD", how can I access the second element of the string "B"? Thanks, Miao 2012/7/27 Daniel Nordlund <djnordlund@frontier.com> > > -----Original Message----- > > From: r-help-bounces@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces@r-project.org] > > On Behalf Of jpm miao
2017 Jul 05
0
Svyglm Error
hi, i am not hitting an error when i copy and paste your code into a fresh console. maybe compare your sessionInfo() to mine? > sessionInfo() R version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30) Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) Running under: Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 (build 7601) Service Pack 1 Matrix products: default locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252
2013 May 02
1
Package survey: singularities in linear regression models
Hello, I want to specify a linear regression model in which the metric outcome is predicted by two factors and their interaction. glm() computes effects for each factor level and the levels of the interaction. In the case of singularities glm() displays "NA" for the corresponding coefficients. However, svyglm() aborts with an error message. Is there a possibility that svyglm()
2006 Jul 18
1
Survey-weighted ordered logistic regression
Hi, I am trying to fit a model with an ordered response variable (3 levels) and 13 predictor variables. The sample has complex survey design and I've used 'svydesign' command from the survey package to specify the sampling design. After reading the manual of 'svyglm' command, I've found that you can fit a logistic regression (binary response variable) by specifying the
2009 Dec 18
2
how to combine multiple indicator variables in a single factor
Say I have a dataframe like this: df <- data.frame(cbind(c(1,0,0,1),c(0,1,0,0),c(0,0,1,0))) names(df) <- c('a','b','c') I would like to create a factor in a new column, where the factor values are taken from the column names, like this: > df2 a b c f 1 1 0 0 a 2 0 1 0 b 3 0 0 1 c 4 1 0 0 a How would I do this? Thanks, Dan Daniel Nordlund Bothell, WA USA
2015 Apr 16
4
Weighted Likelihood
¡Muchas gracias Olivier! Un saludo. El 16 de abril de 2015, 10:44, Olivier Nuñez <onunez en unex.es> escribió: > Mira el paquete survey. > Un saludo. Olivier > > ----- Mensaje original ----- > De: "Víctor Nalda Castellet" <victor.nalda.castellet en gmail.com> > Para: "r-help-es" <r-help-es en r-project.org> > Enviados: Miércoles, 15 de
2011 Mar 07
1
Risk differences with survey package
I'm trying to use the survey package to calculate a risk difference with confidence interval for binge drinking between sexes. Variables are X_RFBING2 (Yes, No) and SEX. Both are factors. I can get the group prevalences easily enough with result <- svyby(~X_RFBING2, ~SEX, la04.svy, svymean, na.rm = TRUE) and then extract components from the svyby object with SE() and coef() to do the
2011 Feb 10
1
Revolution Analytics reading SAS datasets
Has anyone heard whether Revolution Analytics is going to release this capability to the R community? http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110201005852/en/Revolution-Analytics-Unlocks-SAS-Data Dan Daniel Nordlund Bothell, WA USA
2009 Oct 09
1
svy / weighted regression
Dear list, I am trying to set up a propensity-weighted regression using the survey package. Most of my population is sampled with a sampling probability of one (that is, I have the full population). However, for a subset of the data I have only a 50% sample of the full population. In previous work on the data, I analyzed these data using SAS and STATA. In those packages I used a propensity weight
2009 Aug 24
6
Combining matrices
If I have two matrices like x <- matrix(rep(c(1,2,3),3),3) y <- matrix(rep(c(4,5,6),3),3) How can I combine them to get ? 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 6 6 6 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 5 5 5 2 2 2 6 6 6 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 6 6 6 The number of rows and the actual numbers above are unimportant, they are given so as to illustrate how I want to combine the matrices. I.e., I am looking for