similar to: SF-36 questionnaire scoring for R?

I have dataframe with 17factors variables (for example every factor have 3levels) I have maybe 5000 observation. And i need to do table where is in every raw 1 of possible combination of this factors and the numbur how many time is this combination in my dataset. I wrote one code, but this is very slow and dumb. it looks like this: i<-0 for(i1 in levels(hivdat$pohl)){

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this. Background Introduction I have a data set consisting of data collected from a questionnaire that I wish to validate. I have chosen to use confirmatory factor analysis to analyse this data set. Instrument The instrument consists of 11 subscales. There is a total of 68 items in the 11 subscales. Each item is scored on an integer scale between 1 to 4.

Hello: When I use SPSS I execute the AGGREGATE DATA comand for the next data: 2112141123212213212213334 3143244113442312121213344 2114141123112214212113344 2112211122212413421213221 3114444123442414343413344 2312231223212222323223322 2143241123212313131213234 2113241113212313222213333 2113141123112214212113344 2114141123412111114413344 2113211122342314222313234 2114141123112414212113344

Hi all, Can anyone suggest me how to insert rows in between data frames and also keep the ordering of row numbers correct? Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) recmeanC2 9.275880e-17 6.322780e-17 1.467057e+00 0.14349903 recmeanC3 1.283534e-17 2.080644e-17 6.168929e-01 0.53781390

*Problem-1* CASE-I---------(works fine) > var1<-"tom" > var1 [1"tom" > var1<-as.character(var1) > var1 [1] "tom" > var2<-c("tom","harry","kate") > logc<-(var1 %in% var2) > logc [1] TRUE > typeof(var1) [1] "character" > typeof(var2) [1] "character"

Hi all, i'm a new user of wine and i have some doubts. First i'm using wine with gentoo. I read in the wine web some info about the config file that wine uses, but in the gentoo ebuild no sample file is installed, or i haven't found it. Even more it seems that the winecfg application is used to configure wine, but it seems to not be finished and uses the registry files in ~/.wine to

Well, my entry for the 24-hour Rails Day competition is here: http://yubnub.org . It''s a web app called YubNub that implements the grandiose idea of a "command line for the Web OS". Type "gim porsche 911" to do a Google Image search for Porsche 911 cars. Type "random 1000" for a random number between 1 and 1000. Type "tts David Heinemeier Hansson is

Hi LLVM-Devs, I have managed to complete updating our sources from LLVM v4.0 to v5.0, but I am getting selection errors for 'callseq_end'. I am aware that the 'ADJCALLSTACKUP' and 'ADJCALLSTACKDOWN' patterns have changed, and have added an additional argument to the TD descriptions for these. There are interactions with 'ISD::CALL' and 'ISD::RET_FLAG',

Hi, I did ib_write_lat in perftest. It worked fine. Between servers and between server and client, 2-byte latency was ~0.8us, 8MB bandwidth was ~6GB/s. Very normal with IB/FDR. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170815/4217c89e/attachment.html>

Hi, I'm a beginner in both statistics and the usage of R. I have been stuck for days with a problem I hope somebody is willing to help me solving. I'm trying to create some kind of graphical plot etc. of my results of the following glm of interactions. I17<-glm(formula = response ~ var1+ var2 + var3 + var4 + var1:var3 + var1:var4, data = data) Is there any possibility to solve

looks like your rdma is not functional did you tested with qperf? On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Hatazaki, Takao <takao.hatazaki at hpe.com> wrote: > Forgot to mention that I was using CentOS7.3 and GlusterFS 3.10.3 that is > the latest available. > > > > *From:* gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces@ > gluster.org] *On Behalf Of

Hi Eli, Recently, I proposed some changes to LLVM to do more lowering of illegal types (like i128 or i17) and other things within the LLVM IR layer, and the proposal was roundly rejected by the LLVM community: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-April/061567.html PNaCl is essentially doing what my proposal described. How do you expect to reconcile the community's desire to avoid

* * Hi , Can anyone help me please with this problem?* * *CASE-I* all_raw_data_NAomitted is my data frame.It has columns with names i1 ,i2, i3,i4…, till i15.It has 291 rows actually ,couldn’t show here. The data frame looks like this:-- i1 i2 i3 i4 i5 i6 i7 i8 i9 i10 i11 i12 i13 i14 i15 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3

Hi, Suppose I've got a matrix, and the first few elements look like "x1 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x1:x3 + x1:x4" "x1 + x2 + x3 + x5 + x1:x2 + x1:x5" "x1 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x1:x3 + x1:x5" and so on (have got terms from x1 ~ x14). If I want to replace all the x1 with i7, all x2 with i14, all x3 with i13, for example. Is there an easy way? I tried to put what I want

Hello, Following an earlier email ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-June/063010.html), we've published an initial version of the PNaCl bitcode reference manual online - http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/pnacl/bitcode-abi. The PNaCl bitcode is a restricted subset of LLVM IR. The reference manual is quite terse, so for the bigger picture I'll repost links to the design

How to NATURAL sort a vector or data frame* by row* , in ascending order ? V1 V2 V3 V4 i1 5.000000e-01 1.036197e-17 4.825338e+16 0.00000000 i10 4.001692e-18 1.365740e-17 2.930053e-01 0.76973827 i12 -1.052843e-17 1.324484e-17 -7.949081e-01 0.42735000 i13 2.571236e-17 1.357336e-17 1.894325e+00 0.05922715 i2

Hi Ji-Hyeon, Thanks to your help I could find out the problematic file. This would be the quota file of my volume it has a different checksum on node1 whereas node2 and arbiternode have the same checksum. This is expected as I had issues which my quota file and had to fix it manually with a script (more details on this mailing list in a previous post) and I only did that on node1. So what I now

After some confusing, winecfg popup a window that says that the application is not yet complete and advice to use the ~/.wine/config file for full setup, and yes wine uses some sections of the config file, but claims that section lioke DRIVES or Serial Ports are not used in the config file. Well at the and i have delete the config file and use the stander *reg files created by winecfg, i have

Hi, I have a 3 nodes replica (including arbiter) volume with GlusterFS 3.8.11 and this night one of my nodes (node1) had an out of memory for some unknown reason and as such the Linux OOM killer has killed the glusterd and glusterfs process. I restarted the glusterd process but now that node is in "Peer Rejected" state from the other nodes and from itself it rejects the two other nodes

> LLVM-GCC 4.0 fails on Cygwin, possibly due to lack of symbolic links. I am trying with llvm-gcc-4.2 from svn. Aaron