similar to: x-axis annotation

The labels on the x-axis are defaulting to scientific notation no matter how small cex.axis is. How can I override scientific notation to get the labels to print out as specified? Here is the code (UNIT here is 0.0105): plot(xm,yv,log="xy",ylim=c(0.1,20)/UNIT,xlim=c(0.004,20)*UNIT,xaxt="n",t ype="n") axis(1,

Dear R helpers, Thanks a lot for your earlier guidance esp. Mr Davind Winsemius Sir. However, there seems to be mis-communication from my end corresponding to my requirement. As I had mentioned in my earlier mail, I am dealing with a very large database of borrowers and I had given a part of it in my earlier mail as given below. For a given rating say "A", I needed to have the bad-wise

Dear All, I'm trying to plot a histogram (with the relative frequencies as the Y axis), But the scale of the y axis is given by 0e+00, 1e-04, 2e-04, 3e-04,......... Now, I have 2 questions 1- Does (1e-04=0.01831563)? 2- If this true,how can i change the given scale to (0.01,0.03,0.05,0.07,0.09)? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear List, I will appreciate any advice regarding how to convert the following numbers [I got in return by taxondive()] in numeric integers without the e.g. 6.4836e+01 abbreviations. Thank you very much in advance, Gian > taxa_dive Species Delta Delta* Lambda+ Delta+ S Delta+ Nat1 5.0000e+00 6.4836e+01 9.5412e+01 6.7753e+02 8.7398e+01 436.99 Nat2

Dear R users: I assigned students to make some graphs and I'm having trouble answering some questions that they have. We are all working on R 2.1 on Fedora Core Linux 4 systems. 1. In the plot, the axis is not labeled by "numbers", but rather scientific notation like "-2e+08" or such. We realize that means -200,000,000. We want to beautify the plot. We would rather

Hi, The format problem is really annoying. How to get rid of it? x [1] 1e+06 And also when I do barplot, x=rnorm(100,mean=1000) barplot(table(cut(x,breaks=c(0,50,100,150,200,250,300,350,400,450,500,1000,2000,5000,10000)))) The data will show as scientific format, when it is larger than 999 (1e+03, 5e+3). I would like all the data in the digit format (1000, 5000). Does any function works

Hi, The code round(0.0002234,4) will return 2e-04, how can I return 0.0002 instead? I want to print 0.0002 instead of 2e-04 for formating purpose. thanks ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals?

R developers, Seems I get a bad result ("%#4.0-1e" in particular) when trying to use prettyNum digits=0 with scientific notation. I tried on both my Linux box and on an online R evaluator and saw the same problem, so it's not limited to my box at least. I see the problem in both R 3.5.3 and R 3.3.2. options(scipen=-100) prettyNum(1, digits=0) [1] "%#4.0-1e" prettyNum(2,

Dear All, I've done some searching, but to no avail -- I'm plotting x-y data via the "plot" command, and the "log=x" command. The graphed x values are in scientific notation (1e-02 1e-01 1e+00 etc). Might you have some idea on how I can get the plot to uses the x values (0.01 0.10 1.0 10.0 etc) instead? A related Q - where might a good place to search for such

Hi I have a large credit portfolio (exceeding 50000 borrowers). For particular process I need to add up the exposures based on the bands. I am giving a small test data below. rating <- c("A", "AAA", "A", "BBB","AA","A","BB", "BBB", "AA", "AA", "AA", "A", "A",

R gurus, Every so often(*) someone asks how to suppress scientific notation in printing, so I thought I'd give it a shot, but I need some help. The formatting decision is made(**) on line 286 of src/main/format.c : if (mF <= *m) { /* IFF it needs less space : "F" (Fixpoint) format */ where mF is the number of characters for "normal" printing and *m is the number

Hi there, I am having difficulties with what seems like a very simple thing. My objective is to plot a distribution map for a species. I have produced a plot with spplot which uses a raster, a few shapefiles and xy points which are the species coordinates. It all works fine until I want to add coordinates for this map. I need to have the ticks and labels for those coordinates *inside* the

Hi all, I would like to have help in getting annotation ticks (corresponding to the minor grid) on my plot. Here is my toy example : par(mar=c(5, 6, 5, 5) + 0.1) x<-1:10 y<-x^2 plot(x,y,log="xy",xlab="log(x)",ylab="log(y)") par(new=T)

How do I convert a list to a matrix? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- list(c(50000, 101), c(1e+05, 46), c(150000, 31), c(2e+05, 17), c(250000, 19), c(3e+05, 11), c(350000, 12), c(4e+05, 25), c(450000, 19), c(5e+05, 16)) as.matrix(a) [,1] [1,] Numeric,2 [2,] Numeric,2 [3,] Numeric,2 [4,] Numeric,2 [5,] Numeric,2 [6,] Numeric,2 [7,]

Dear all, After struggling for some time with *apply() and eva() without success, I decided to ask for help. I have 3 lists labeled with, each contains 3 different interpolation functions with identical names: > names(missgp0) [1] "spl.1mb" "spl.2mb" "spl.5mb" > > names(missgp1) [1] "spl.1mb" "spl.2mb" "spl.5mb" > >

Hi see in line > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Vivek > Sutradhara > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 11:02 AM > To: r-help <r-help at r-project.org> > Subject: [R] Annotation Ticks on the axis > > Hi all, > > I would like to have help in getting annotation ticks (corresponding to the > minor

Dear all, I am using the bigglm package to fit a few GLM's to a large dataset (3 million rows, 6 columns). While trying to fit a Poisson GLM I noticed that the coefficient estimates were very different from what I obtained when estimating the model on a smaller dataset using glm(), I wrote a very basic toy example to compare the results of bigglm() against a glm() call. Consider the

Dear list, When using as.POSIXlt with times measured down to microseconds the default format.POSIXlt seems to cause some possibly undesirable behaviour: According to the code in format.POSIXlt the maximum accuracy of printing fractional seconds is 1 microsecond, but if I do; options( digits.secs = 6 ) as.POSIXlt( 1.000002 , tz="", origin="1970-01-01") as.POSIXlt( 1.999998 ,

Hello All. I am running R 2.0.0 with a Win XP operating system. The same problem occured with R 1.9.1 but not with R.1.3.1 on a Win NT computer. My request is about the following problem with the sort function: The vector price is a vector of 789 asset prices of the following form, > mode(price) [1] "numeric" > price[1:10] [1] 1.1315 1.1314 1.1313 1.1314 1.1315 1.1316 1.1315

Has anyone come across the right combinations to print a limited number of digits? My trial and error approach is taking too much time. Here is what I have tried: > op <- options() > a <- c(1e-10,1,2,3,.5,.25) > names(a) <- c("A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F") > # default > a A B C D