similar to: Reducing a list of functions by composition fails

Hi John, Thanks, but the Bizzaro pipe comes with many flaws though : * It's not a single operator * It has a different precedence * It cannot be used in a subcall * The variable assigned to must be on the right * It doesn't trigger indentation when going to the line * It creates/overwrite a `.` variable in the worksace. And it doesn't deal gracefully with some lazy evaluation edge

I am using rw0641. In my continuing quest to understand repeated measures analysis, I again return to lme. I exported the Potthoff and Roy data Orthodont.dat from S-PLUS 4.5 to avoid capture errors and ran the examples in the R help. I imported the data.frame with data <- read.table("Orthodont.dat",header=T) attach(data) and created the objects Orthodont.fit1 <-

Hello, R is a functional language, pipes are not. There are even higher order functions such as [1] and [2]. Besides, packages are part of R, R couldn't live without them. I find pipes a good idea but I also find it better not to have them as part of base R. If you want to use them, load a package, if you don't, don't. This simple. As for your example, compose, there is a

Dear R-devel, The most popular piping operator sits in the package `magrittr` and is used by a huge amount of users, and imported /reexported by more and more packages too. Many workflows don't even make much sense without pipes nowadays, so the examples in the doc will use pipes, as do the README, vignettes etc. I believe base R could have a piping operator so packages can use a pipe in

I thought I had this fixed, but apparently not. It works okay from the console, but not from the view. I have the following: # partial schema create_table "users", :force => true do |t| t.string "login", :null => false t.string "first_name" t.string "last_name" t.string "email", :null => false

I've googled, RTFMed, and I still can't fix this. Hoping someone here can offer a suggestion. I'm learning, so please explain a little if you can. I installed samba on a Ubuntu 5.10 machine (named mog). My XP machine "sees" it, but the username/password dialog fails. I've traced it down to what I think is an authentication problem: mat@mog:/etc/samba$ smbclient -L

Dear all, I have a list of time series and want to plot them. Is there a way that the dot-dot-dot argument of a function accepts a list as single arguments, such as funcall in several Lisp dialects? Greetings Johannes

Hi. I would like to partially apply a function to a list of arguments, and I don't know how to do this in R, without perhaps writing default values to the formals() of my function, or writing to the environment object of a function. For context, my definition of partially apply is: "fix some of the arguments, leaving the others as variables, return a new function that takes the un-fixed

I am trying to consume a .NET webservice from http://ws.melissadata.com/dqws/address.asmx Whenever I call soap.doSingleRecord I receive an error saying that I have an "Empty XML Request Structure". Looking at the sample SOAP request it appears that all the settings I am sending need to be wrapped in <Request> tags. So it lookes like I need to build a seperate Request object and

so becky said mog is out, i remeber seeing it about a year ago on craigslist but didnt apply since it sounded like a last.fm ripoff and why waste time reinventing a wheel?..anyways, im wondering if it performs ok for anyone? it keeps freezing up on my trying to edit the page. sometimes a response comes back after about 10 seconds. im only guessing it runs rails, based on the gratuitous use of

> There are other instances, such as Reduce where there is a bug > report pending that amounts to the same issue. Performing surgery on > expressions and calling eval is not good practice at the R level and > probably not a good idea at the C level either. It is worth thinking > this through carefully before a adopting a solution, which is what we > will be doing. Surgery on

Don't you have the same problem with other atoms, e.g. variable names? This sounds like something that should be implemented in the language's runtime library. On May 4, 2014 7:15 PM, "Alexander Popolitov" <popolit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I'm trying to implement lisp's funcall function, which roughly calls a > function, name of which

Dear list members, I recall seeing a convenience function for applying multiple functions to one object (i.e., almost the opposite of 'mapply?) somewhere. Example: If the function was named ?fun? the output of fun(3.14, mode, typeof, class) would be identical to the output of c(mode(3.14), typeof(3.14), class(3.14)) Is my memory failing me, or does such a function already exists in a

Dear R-users, I want to compose a new table (a presence/absence matrix of species in regions) by matches between two data frames. The first data frame has the species as header and the habitats in which they occure as elements. The second data frame has the regions as header and the occuring habitats as elements. To fill a cell in the new matrix (e.g. spcs.x in region.y) I want R to compare the

I don''t even know what its called really, so its hard to search for. Here''s an example. They do this on MOG.com: There''s one text field visible. You type in a band name. Another text field appears. It auto completes album names based on the band name you chose in the first field. What is this type of thing called? Where is some source code I could look at? any

Another spin-off discussion. The scheme used on <http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/Metadata> was to packetize XML (split it up into packets at the root level, each of which was self contained (the terminology has temporarily abandoned me), and have the bos packet as the opening <?xml &c. stanza, the eos a </xml>. It is probably more sensible to include a magic number identifying

Would introducing the new frame, with the call to local(), cause problems when you use frame counting instead of <<- to modify variables outside the scope of lapply's FUN, I think the frame counts may have to change. E.g., here is code from actuar::simul() that might be affected: x <- unlist(lapply(nodes[[i]], seq)) lapply(nodes[(i + 1):(nlevels - 1)],

Hello. I'm trying to make some graphics with nationalized labels (pdf for use in LaTeX document). On console (displayed on screen) using all looks ok: ----------------------------------------\/ data<-rnorm(100) hist(data,main='Rozk?ad g?sto?ci punkt?w', xlab='Warto?? na osi y', ylab='Cz?sto?? wyst?powania') -------------------------------------------/\ But

> I would like to use compositions package with ggplot/ggtern, other > composition classes of compositional package can be used with ggtern > by converting to data frame but I could do anything with c(ount)comp > class. Ggplot/ggtern can not recognise comp and also can not be converted > to data frame. Is there any other way to do this? As Jeff pointed out, the help page says ccomp

Hello, I think I've stumbled over a composition bug (doesn't happen with ExaNoComposite) which is also present in the Intel-Driver: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16913 However the latest nouveau release I tested against was 0.10 (that one shipped with Fedora9), and I don't have a spare system arround that I could use for testing. It would be really great if somebody