similar to: What does `_data` mean in transform()?

Dear r-devel, See below: transform(data.frame(a = 1), 2, 3) #> a #> 1 1 transform(data.frame(a = 1), b=2, 3) #> a b X3 #> 1 1 2 3 We need a small modification to make it work consistently, see below: transform.data.frame <- function (`_data`, ...) { e <- eval(substitute(list(...)), `_data`, parent.frame()) tags <- names(e) ## NEW LINE

I have timstamped data like this: > sd[1:10,] Tstamp Density Mesh50 Mesh70 Mesh100 Mesh150 Mesh200 2 2009/02/27 07:00 30.5 0.7 10.7 21.4 32.8 41.6 3 2009/02/27 08:00 32.2 1.6 12.4 23.3 34.5 43.0 4 2009/02/27 09:00 32.7 4.8 13.0 24.0 35.1 43.5 5 2009/02/27 10:00 26.7 0.3 6.5 17.6 28.1 36.9 6 2009/02/27 11:00

Note that ?transform.data.frame says arguments need to be named, so you are testing unspecified behaviour. I guess this falls in a similar category as the note If some of the values are not vectors of the appropriate length, you deserve whatever you get! Experiments for a related Problem Report (<https://bugs.r-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17890>) showed that packages

A question that has come up a few times on r-help is how to rename columns of a data.frame. There are several ways to do this by hand (see the list archives). There is also a 'rename' function in the reshape package. I often use the 'transform' function shortly after reading in a data file and wanted to have a renaming function that has a syntax consistent with the

Dear useRs, Here is a weird behavior of transform function: mtcars1<-matcars transform(mtcars1,t1=3,t2=4) Error in data.frame(`_data`, e[!matched]) : arguments imply differing number of rows: 32, 1 instead, this works: mtcars1$t1<-0 transform(mtcars1,t1=3,t2=4) also works if applied in turn: transform(mtcars1,t1=3) transform(mtcars1,t2=4) I often need to use this

Hello, Maybe something like the following. splitDF <- function(data, col, s){ n <- nrow(data) inx <- which(data[[col]] %in% s) lapply(seq_along(inx), function(i){ k <- if(inx[i] < n) (inx[i] + 1):(inx[i + 1]) data[k, ] }) } splitDF(DF, "name", split_str) Hope this helps, Rui Barradas On 5/19/2018 12:07 PM, Christofer Bogaso

Good Afternoon, I have the following code, but it seems that something must be doing wrong, because it is giving the results I want. The idea is to create segments while the value of Commutation is less than 1000. for example, from the small set of data below text=" val_user pos v v_star v_end commutation v_source v_destine 1 1 96-96 1173438391 1173438391 0

Starting in SVN revision 47035 (which shows up in the R-2-9-0 line), transform.data.frame() started accepting arguments like 'row.names' and 'stringsAsFactors' to be passed through to the data.frame() function. It looks like this was an unintentional side-effect of letting multiple columns be added properly. Given that this has been implemented for quite a while, should it now be

HI, The code was working perfectly fine yesterday and today, until half an hour ago.? Couldn't find any problems in the code. Still, I am getting error message. myMatrix <- data.matrix(read.table(text=" Name??????????? Age ANTONY??????? 27 IMRAN????????? 30 RAJ????????????????? 22 NAHAS????????? 32 GEO??????????????? 42 ", header=TRUE)) MinMaxArray? <- data.frame(MIN =

Hi, I have two questions want to ask. 1. If I have a matrix like this, and I want to figure out the rows whose value in the 3rd column are less than 0.05. How can I do it with R. hsa-let-7a--MBTD1 0.528239197 2.41E-05 hsa-let-7a--APOBEC1 0.507869409 5.51E-05 hsa-let-7a--PAPOLA 0.470451884 0.000221774 hsa-let-7a--NF2 0.469280186 0.000231065 hsa-let-7a--SLC17A5

Dear R user, I have written a function which returns max,min and variation of a power (see below) Power is a given matrix(1,n) I call the function >Variation<-VAR(p,(n-deltat)) Now the problem is when I want plot(Results[1],Results[2]). Not possible! I become the following error (in english it means: Error in as.double.default(x) :Object cannot be transformed in double) >

The documentation says, "pmax and pmin take several vectors as arguments and return a single vector giving the parallel maxima (or minima) of the vectors." I discovered that, if you use a matrix or array instead of a vector, pmax returns a matrix or array, respectively. This makes pmax and pmin much more useful, and should not be left to people to discover on their own! For example:

Hi everyone, I am wondering what¹s stopping the LLVM optimizer (opt -O3) from eliminating the apparently useless « icmp sgt » instruction in the following piece of LLVM IR. > ; ModuleID = 'lambda-opt.bc' > target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" > target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.10.0" > > ; Function

Hello, Use grep to get the row indices and then subset with a *negative* index to remove those rows. rn <- scan(what = character(), text = " 70/556 71.1/280 72.1/556 72.1/343 73.1/390 73.1/556 ") mat <- matrix(rnorm(6*6), nrow = 6) row.names(mat) <- rn inx <- grep("73\\.", row.names(mat)) new_mat <- mat[-inx, ] new_mat Hope this helps, Rui Barradas On

Hi, Please consider the following : x = c(1,3,NA,5) y = c(2,NA,4,1) min(x,y,na.rm=TRUE) # ok [1] 1 max(x,y,na.rm=TRUE) # ok [1] 5 sum(x,y,na.rm=TRUE) # ok [1] 16 pmin(x,y,na.rm=TRUE) # ok [1] 1 3 4 1 pmax(x,y,na.rm=TRUE) # ok [1] 2 3 4 5 psum(x,y,na.rm=TRUE) [1] 3 3 4 6 # expected result Error: could not find function "psum" # actual result

Hi, I wonder whether similarly to the very quick rowSums and colSums functions in the base package, one could add quick functions that calculate the min or max over rows / cols in a matrix. While apply(x,1,min) works, I found out by profiling a program of mine that it is rather slow for matrices with a very large number of rows. A quick functionality seems to be already there in the

Am 27.08.24 um 11:55 schrieb peter dalgaard: > Yes. A quirk, rather than a bug I'd say. One issue is that the internal logic of transform() relies on > > e <- eval(substitute(list(...)), `_data`, parent.frame()) > tags <- names(e) > > so untagged entries in ... will not be included. ... unless at least one is tagged: R> transform(BOD, 0:5, 1:6) Time

Hello, I'm trying to override pmin and pmax for my own matrix. These two functions have ... as an argument. I tried to override them as follows: setMethod("pmax", class_name, function(x, ..., na.rm) { ... }) I use this way to override primitive functions such as min/max and it works fine. But it doesn't work for pmin and pmax. I guess because they are regular functions? How

Here's a version that doesn't try to do block deletion on it's own. If you use -adce then -simplifycfg, you get what you want. It passes all tests except one, which is that we delete an invoke of a pure function, IE Transforms/ADCE/dce_pure_invoke.ll - I'm not sure why that's bad. The reason we delete it is because it returns false to I.mayHaveSideEffects(), and in particular,

Hello, Please always cc the list. As for the question, yes, it does. If you want to remove just the ones with exactly 73.1 use the pattern grep("^73\\.1$", etc) Explanation: Beginning of string: ^ End of string: $ Escape special characters: \\ (needed because the period is a special character.) Hope this helps, Rui Barradas On 5/22/2018 12:50 PM, Ahmed Serag wrote: > Thank