Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Change the frequency of a ts?"
2011 Nov 02
1
kernapply.ts
I have a suggestion for kernapply for ts objects. When we choose the
option circular=F, the returned series don't have the correct dates. The
removed dates are all at the beginning instead of half at the beginning
and half at the end. It is particularly useful when we need to smooth
the series (or remove a trend using a filter) before estimating a model
(like in macroeconomics) or simply
2005 Jun 03
1
ts.intersect a multivariate and univariate ts
This seems like a FAQ, but I can't figure it out.
I have a mv ts object:
R > tsp(pg)
[1] 1982 2003 1
R > dim(pg)
[1] 22 12
and a univariate ts:
R > tsp(rw)
[1] 1690 1996 1
Yet, when I try to intersect them:
R > tsp(ts.intersect(rw, pg))
[1] 1982 2176 1
the process goes awry.
How to I get rw and pg to be one ts that runs from 1982 to 1996 and has 13
univariate time
2005 Jan 31
2
changing the time base in a ts
I'm probably apporaching this all wrong to start but....
Suppose I have a monthly time series and I want to compute the mean of
months 6,7, and 8. I want to plot the original time series and the
seasonal time series, one above the other. When I do that as below the
time series don't line up for reasons that are obvious. How can I
change the base of the seasonal time series so I can make
2007 Nov 24
1
patch proposal for plot.ts
Hi all.
Currently, if you try:
> lag.plot(1:10)
you get superposed labels '1' and '10'. Things go worse in more extreme cases:
x <- ts(1:10)
x1 <- lag(x, 4)
plot(x1, x)
This is due to a mistake in plot.ts. My suggestion is the following
really minimal patch to plot.ts:
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ plot.ts <-
text(xy, labels =
2020 Oct 06
1
[PATCH] device: return error for unknown chipsets
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 06:46:35PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 6:43 PM dann frazier <dann.frazier at canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 03:52:30PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote:
> > > Previously the code relied on device->pri to be NULL and to fail probing
> > > later. We really should just return an error inside
2020 Oct 06
1
[PATCH] device: return error for unknown chipsets
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 03:52:30PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote:
> Previously the code relied on device->pri to be NULL and to fail probing
> later. We really should just return an error inside nvkm_device_ctor for
> unsupported GPUs.
>
> Fixes: 24d5ff40a732 ("drm/nouveau/device: rework mmio mapping code to get rid of second map")
> Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst
1999 Jul 27
3
Preliminary version of ts package
There is now a preliminary version of a time series package in the R-devel
snapshots, and we would welcome feedback on it. It is based in part on the
packages bats (Martyn Plummer) and tseries (Adrian Trapletti) and in part
on code I had or have written. (Thanks for the contributions, Martyn and
Adrian!) Some of the existing ts code has been changed, for example to plot
multiple time series, so
2019 Sep 16
2
Maybe bug? Using non-integer frequencies in stats::ts
I am developing a package to analyse physiological time-series and I
thought that the most reliable and robust solution was to base it on the
native stats::ts class. In my domain it is common to express series
frequencies as samples-per-second. So ts(..., frequency=10) would mean a
signal sampled 10 times every second, and ts(..., frequency = 1) a signal
sampled every second. Following this logic,
2017 Sep 02
1
Precision error in time index of ts objects
Thanks for the very detailed explanation.
I did not create the series using structure(), that was the result of
dump() on an intermediate object created within tsdisagg::ta(), which is
where I found the error in the first place. ta() indeed manipulates .Tsp
directly, rather than using ts. I guess this is a bug in tsdisagg then.
Thanks!
--
Andrea Altomani
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 12:31 AM
2020 Oct 05
2
[PATCH] device: return error for unknown chipsets
Previously the code relied on device->pri to be NULL and to fail probing
later. We really should just return an error inside nvkm_device_ctor for
unsupported GPUs.
Fixes: 24d5ff40a732 ("drm/nouveau/device: rework mmio mapping code to get rid of second map")
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com>
Cc: dann frazier <dann.frazier at canonical.com>
---
2013 Oct 23
2
Multivariate time series in R 3 vs R 2
Hello!
Recently I got report that my package mar1s doesn't pass checks any more on
R 3.0.2. I started to investigate and found the following difference in
multivariate time series handling in R 3.0.2 compared to R 2 (I've checked
on 2.14.0).
Suppose I wish to calculate seasonal component for time series. In case of
multivariate time series, I wish to process each column independently.
2009 Jun 14
1
time function behavior for ts class objects
Hi all-
I am trying to use the time function for ts class objects and do not
understand the return value. I want to use it to set up a time trend in
arima fits. It does not seem to return a correct linear sequence that
matches the underlying time series. I am running:
R version 2.8.1 (2008-12-22).
For example:
R> ## create a time series
R> x <- rnorm(24)
R> (xts <-
2017 Sep 01
0
Precision error in time index of ts objects
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Andrea Altomani wrote:
> I should have formulated my question in a more specific way.
>
> 1. I suspect this is a floating point precision issue. I am not very
> knowledgeable about R internals, can someone else confirm it?
Yes. If you represent a series with increment 1/12 it depends on how you
do it. As a simple example consider the following two descriptions
2017 Sep 01
2
Precision error in time index of ts objects
I have a time series x, and two other series obtained from it:
x <- structure(2017, .Tsp = c(2017.41666666667, 2017.41666666667, 12),
class = "ts")
y <- floor(x)
z <- x-y
I would expect the three series to have exactly the same index.
However I get the following
> time(x)-time(y)
Jun
2017 0
as expected, but
> time(x)-time(z)
integer(0)
Warning message:
In
2000 Aug 21
2
diff.default / diff.ts in wrong package bug (PR#640)
{all recent versions of R}
Problem / design bug :
diff.default() doesn't deal with "ts" objects properly,
diff.ts() does, but that is only available from package "ts"
where as the constructor function ts() is in base.
It's not sufficient to just move diff.ts() to package base,
since it relies itself on lag & lag.default which are also only in package
ts.
1999 Jul 15
1
[R] R: ts - objects (PR#228)
Marcus Eger <marcus.eger@physik.uni-marburg.de> writes:
> > time(sqrt(arrts))
> Time Series:
> Start = c(1, 1)
> End = c(5, 1)
> Frequency = 1
> [1] 1 2 3 4 5
Looks like a bug...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2. (At least) boolean indexing with matrices does not seem to work
> properly:
>
2009 Nov 20
2
How to setup the tsp attribute of a dataset
Hello,
I am wondering how I should set up the tsp attribute (available through
attr(x, "tsp")) of a dataset x? Let's assume that x has 100 points, and
I want to set the frequency to 4.
I tried:
> attr(x,"tsp")<-c(1,100,4)
Error in attr(x, "tsp") <- c(1, 100, 4) :
invalid time series parameters specified
Is there any other way to set the frequency of
2011 Aug 19
3
ATSP to TSP reformulation
Greetings,
I am having trouble getting the function reformulate_ATSP_as_TSP to work for
me. I have provided a simple example of some of the code I've been using.
In particular, I'm not sure why I'm getting the error
"Error in dimnames(tsp) <- list(lab, lab) :
length of 'dimnames' [1] not equal to array extent"
since I created the object ATSP with a valid
1998 Sep 28
1
"tsp<-"
If value is NULL I think tsp assignment should not return a class ts object.
Below is a fixed version.
Paul Gilbert
____
"tsp<-" <-function(x, value)
{if (is.null(value))
{attr(x, "tsp") <- value
if(inherits(x,"ts")) class(x) <- NULL
return(x)
}
attr(x, "tsp") <- value
class(x) <- "ts"
x
}
2017 Sep 01
2
Precision error in time index of ts objects
I should have formulated my question in a more specific way.
1. I suspect this is a floating point precision issue. I am not very
knowledgeable about R internals, can someone else confirm it?
2. Should this be considered a bug or not, because it is "just a precision
issue"? Should I report it?
3. How can it happen? From a quick review of ts.R, it looks like the values
of the time