similar to: R can't find gcc library that other programs can.

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > > > On 13.06.2010 01:09, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> >> On 06/12/10 05:27 PM, Douglas Bates wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Dr. David Kirkby >>> <david.kirkby at onetel.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> R 2.10.1 is used in

There are a number of errors in the R manual about Solaris. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#Solaris 1) Firstly, Sun are now owned by Oracle, who bought them for $7 billion. 2) "(Recent Sun machines are Opterons (?amd64?) rather than ?x86?, but 32-bit ?x86? executables are the default.) " That's incorrect. All recent Sun workstations used *Intel* CPUs -

Dear R devel list, Good morning; I'm with the Sage (http://www.sagemath.org) project. (Some of you might have seen my talk on this at last summer's useR conference). We have some rudimentary support for using R graphics in various cases, which has proved useful to many of our users who want to go back and forth between R and other capabilities within Sage. Unfortunately, the way we

The R manual says R will not build with gcc on 64-bit Solaris x86 with gcc http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#Solaris "Tests with gcc32 on ?x86? and ?amd64? have been less successful: ?x86? builds have failed on tests using complex arithmetic33, whereas on ?amd64? the builds have failed to complete in several different ways, most recently with relocation errors for

I've tried to build R 2.6.1 and 2.7.0 on Solaris 10 update 4 (SPARC) and both configure ok, so you might ask why I suspect there is a problem. I tried to build the maths program Sage http://www.sagemath.org/ version 3.0.3alpha1. Sage fails when building R 2.6.1 - (Sage includes R in the package). The relavant bit of Sage, which is only using an unmodified R configure script is: checking

Hello, I'm attempting to build R on Solaris 64-bit using gcc4, and am running into the following error: ld.so.1: R: fatal: relocation error: R_AMD64_PC32: file /home/chander.ganesan/src/r/R-2.15.0/lib/libR.so: symbol main: value 0x28001597b8c does not fit I've noticed - from some lists, and a bug here (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9040) that this isn't an

Hi R-Devel, The Sage project (http://www.sagemath.org) has been working extremely hard for several years to create a viable free open source alternative to Maple, Matlab, Mathematica, and Magma. Numerous users have requested statistical functionality. Though Sage includes scipy and numpy, which have some statistical functionality, we've decided the best longterm solution is to strongly

I'm trying to build R 2.10.1 on a Sun Blade 1000 running Solaris 10 (03/05 release). I've installed iconv 1.13.1 and used: CPPFLAGS="-I /export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.3.3.alpha0/local/include" (which is where iconv is) LDFLAGS= -R/export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.3.3.alpha0/local/lib -L/export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.3.3.alpha0/local/lib The build of R fails as below. gcc

> Looking for a recommended package that handles prime number computations. I'm not sure whether this would be helpful to you, but Sage (http://www.sagemath.org) has excellent number theory support and several ways to interface with R (which is included in the distribution of Sage). I use it myself to access several R packages I need to do analysis on data I produce in Sage/Python, and

R 2.10.1 is used in the Sage maths project. Several recommended packages (Matrix, class, mgcv, nnet, rpart, spatial, and survival) are failing to build on Solaris 10 (SPARC). We would like to be able to get a list of the recommended packages for R 2.10.1, but ideally via a call to R, so it is not necessary to update that list every time a new version of R is released. We do not want to access

Dear all, I just changed from linux to a solaris server and I'm having trouble building R from source. I can't use the binaries because I don't have a permission to write to /usr/local. I followed the online instructions regarding the configuration with readline and the GNU version of iconv: ./configure --prefix=/u/fox/binaries

Trying to get 2.11.1 built on a solaris 10 machine. This particular machine I do not have root access so I have just created an area under my home to use. I am currently having issues in the src/library area most specifically with getting the datasets area built. Here is the output form my most recent compile: building package 'datasets' all.R is unchanged

On 12 June 2010 00:51, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote: >> Hi Eli, >> >> On 11 June 2010 22:44, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote:

Hi Bill- I think, ideally, the backend would be able to match arbitrary-precision arithmetic to add-with-carry or subtract-with-borrow through i65/i33. That would remove the need for the overflow intrinsics entirely. Alistair On 13 Jun 2010, at 02:27, Bill Hart wrote: > I was able to get the loop to increment from -999 to 0 using IR > directly. That got rid of the cmpq. > > The

I was able to get the loop to increment from -999 to 0 using IR directly. That got rid of the cmpq. The carry i was after was able to be obtained using the intrinsic @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i64, however there is no way to add with carry and have it realise that the resulting *carry out* cannot exceed 1. It actually writes the carry to a byte, and then uses logical operations on it, which slows

Yeah I had a think about it, and I think intrinsics are the wrong way to do it. So I'd say you are likely right. Bill. On 13 June 2010 04:33, Alistair Lynn <arplynn at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bill- > > I think, ideally, the backend would be able to match arbitrary-precision arithmetic to add-with-carry or subtract-with-borrow through i65/i33. That would remove the need for the

Dear David, > I managed to install Sage on Windows (via a Linux VM), but I cannot find any documentation on how to use R from Sage. Maybe I > should use the web interface of Sage to avoid having to install R on the VM. In the Sage command line, you can type sage: r? to get some very basic info, and sage: r.[tab] to get various commands. This part of the interface still needs some

Hi, today we had to hard-reboot one of our dovecot proxy backends and after boot up, lot's of accounts were showing this error and appeard empty: Error: Corrupted transaction log file ... After deleting the indexes (not uid file, problem wasn't in deleting indexes, i'm doing this often), e-mails showed up ok but e-mail clinets started to download them again. Why this

Hi everyone, I'm using Linux kernel 2.4.29 and samba 3.0.10 with Slackware 10.1 distro and I'm having trouble getting the mount.smb to respect my uid and gid options. Whichever uid and gid I specify I get something strange like uid 147926 and gid 101. I heard someplace that this is a bug in the smbfs kernel module but in that case it has appeard after the kernel 2.4.22 since I started

Loaded sage from disc and all the install pages seem to work up to a point where you click cancel for wine debug then it continues and says sage is installed. Sage appears in the Applications/wine/programmes/sage instant accounts but fails to start? How do I remove sage and start again or what should I do to get it running? I'm using ubuntu 10.04 and have wine 1.2. I'm completely new to