similar to: counting across leves of factors

Dear R users, I am modelling the probability of error in a behavioural task using the glm() function (with the numbers of successes and failures listed for each line in the data frame). How can I plot the partial effects of the predictors? Many thanks in advance, Stav

Hi LLVM-Devs, I have managed to complete updating our sources from LLVM v4.0 to v5.0, but I am getting selection errors for 'callseq_end'. I am aware that the 'ADJCALLSTACKUP' and 'ADJCALLSTACKDOWN' patterns have changed, and have added an additional argument to the TD descriptions for these. There are interactions with 'ISD::CALL' and 'ISD::RET_FLAG',

Hi, my data looks this: id forma program kod obor rocnik 1 10001 kombinovan? Matematika M1101 matematika 1 2 10002 prezen?n? Informatika N1801 teoretick? informatika 1 3 10002 prezen?n? Informatika B1801 obecn? informatika 3 4 10003 prezen?n? Informatika M1801 softwarov?

Hi, FYI - don't sue me for posting this here - I know, everyone who needs this info *should* have it already, but maybe not ;-) Kind regards, B. Courtin -- OpenSSL Security Advisory [30 July 2002] This advisory consists of two independent advisories, merged, and is an official OpenSSL advisory. Advisory 1 ========== A.L. Digital Ltd and The Bunker (http://www.thebunker.net/) are

Hi, I'm a beginner in both statistics and the usage of R. I have been stuck for days with a problem I hope somebody is willing to help me solving. I'm trying to create some kind of graphical plot etc. of my results of the following glm of interactions. I17<-glm(formula = response ~ var1+ var2 + var3 + var4 + var1:var3 + var1:var4, data = data) Is there any possibility to solve

Hi, I am doing a hierarchical CFA using the sem package. I have 20 items, and I have 2 factors (F3 and F4), and also F1 and F2 are nested within F3. Here is the code that I have, but it is giving me an error message "Warning message: In eval(expr, envir, enclos) : Negative parameter variances. Model may be underidentified." and a further error "Error in summary.objectiveML(cfa,

Hi Martin, Pseudo CALLSEQ_START was changed in r302527, commit message contains details on the changes. However CALLSEQ_END was not modified. If your made changes to ADJCALLSTACKUP to add additional argument, that may result in error. Thanks, --Serge 2017-09-15 19:09 GMT+07:00 Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hi LLVM-Devs, > > I have managed

Hi Eli, Recently, I proposed some changes to LLVM to do more lowering of illegal types (like i128 or i17) and other things within the LLVM IR layer, and the proposal was roundly rejected by the LLVM community: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-April/061567.html PNaCl is essentially doing what my proposal described. How do you expect to reconcile the community's desire to avoid

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this. Background Introduction I have a data set consisting of data collected from a questionnaire that I wish to validate. I have chosen to use confirmatory factor analysis to analyse this data set. Instrument The instrument consists of 11 subscales. There is a total of 68 items in the 11 subscales. Each item is scored on an integer scale between 1 to 4.

How can I get the log odds associated with the levels in strata() within a clogit() model? I'm running R-1.9.0 on a Linux platform. I am using clogit() to run a Rasch model in Item Response Theory in psychometrics. Symbolically, the model is: logit(p_{j,k}) = \log({\Pr(p_{j,k}) \over \Pr(1-p_{j,k})}) = \theta_j - \alpha_k, That is, the log odds of answering an test item correctly is

Dear useRs from the physiology department, Does someone know of an implementation of the SF-36 questionnaire scoring in R? I only found SAS and STATA versions, e.g http://gim.med.ucla.edu/FacultyPages/Hays/util.htm Dieter

Hello: When I use SPSS I execute the AGGREGATE DATA comand for the next data: 2112141123212213212213334 3143244113442312121213344 2114141123112214212113344 2112211122212413421213221 3114444123442414343413344 2312231223212222323223322 2143241123212313131213234 2113241113212313222213333 2113141123112214212113344 2114141123412111114413344 2113211122342314222313234 2114141123112414212113344

Hello, Following an earlier email ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-June/063010.html), we've published an initial version of the PNaCl bitcode reference manual online - http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/pnacl/bitcode-abi. The PNaCl bitcode is a restricted subset of LLVM IR. The reference manual is quite terse, so for the bigger picture I'll repost links to the design

Dear all, First of all, Merry Christmas! :) While testing a File I/O sample program, I've encountered a link failure due to missing implementation of "\01__isoc99_fscanf" function. I think this function should be named "__isoc99_fscanf" instead. Please see the program code and LLVM IR generated by DragonEgg and clang below. It shows that clang generates

OK, I'm clear on scalars. Data races are thankfully OK in this context. Densely packing vectors sounds efficient and is clear in the case where lanes * width is a multiple of 8 bits. I don't think I understand how it works in other cases. If we could take store <4 x i8> truncating to <4 x i7> as an example. This can be converted into four scalar i8 -> i7 stores with

? Jadersk? ubytov?n? od poskytovatel? Rezervujte v?as ubytov?n? u Jadranu! Pro?ijte svou dovolenou ve slunn?m Chorvatsku Ubytov?n? p??mo od poskytovatel?! Je?t? v?as si rezervujte p??mo?skou dovolenou! K?i???lov? ?ist? mo?e, z??iv? slunce V?s ?ek? na Jadranu. Rezervujte v?as ? ???? Email byl zasl?n na emailovou adresu

Hi, I''m trying to create a dropdown using collection_select. However, I cant seem to get it to select the right option by default. In my controller I have a setup like this: @content = Content.new @content.selection_id = 3 @selections = Selection.find(:all) In my view I have: <% form_for :content, @content, :url => { :action => ''create'' } do |f| %>

Hi. I''m using a migration to extract data from one table, to another. In the process I also convert ip-adresses to integers, for insertion in the new table. Problem is that migrations doesn''t seem to handle large numbers very well. The conversion works fine from the script/console, but when running it from migrations only very low IP-ranges "make it thru".

Nav?tivte na?e webov? str?nky infotigra a objevte, jak JEDNA jedin? mal? modr? pilulka m??e do?ivotn? zm?nit VA?I sexu?ln? v?konnost! ? V??en? z?kazn?k! V?deck? testy prok?zaly, ?e TIGRA funguje l?pe ne? jak?koli jin? pilulka. Test na 800 mu??ch ve v?ku 21 a? 80 let prok?zal ohromuj?c? v?sledky: ? 1. A? o 71 % siln?j?? touha

[mod: Forwarded by Jeff Uphoff. I tried to mangle the headers that it appears as the original post: with an invalid return address. -- REW] A few months back, a very alpha version of bliss got posted. That shouldn''t have happened, but, it was pretty much ignored so I didn''t worry about it. But now it seems there''s a bit of a fuss about this. I''ll post the