similar to: GEE: estimate of predictor with high time dependency

Hi, I'm running GEE using geepack. I set corstr = "ar1" as below: > m.ar <- geeglm(L ~ O + A, + data = firstgrouptxt, id = id, + family = binomial, corstr = "ar1") > summary(m.ar) Call: geeglm(formula = L ~ O + A, family = binomial, data = firstgrouptxt, id = id, corstr = "ar1") Coefficients:

Hi, I'm using 'geepack' to run Generalized Estimating Equations. I'm aware that I can use anova to compare two models, but would it be possible to test QIC on R? It seems that there were similar questions a couple of years ago, but the question has not been answered yet. I'd appreciate if someone could show me the code! Thank you, Sachi [[alternative HTML version

Dear R list members, I'd like to make a graph of coefficients of the intercept, variable 1, and variable 2 (and possibly the interaction between variable 1 and variable 2). When I use the lmList function as attached below, it shows a nice coefficient graph. > PACRP.lis <- lmList(PAffect ~ CRPC + CRPT + CINT | ID, redinteract) > coef(PACRP.lis) > PACRPlis.coef <-

Hi, Probably this is a very simple question for all the programmers, but how do you change from 32-bit builds (default) to 64-bit builds? I've been trying to run Anova to compare two models, but I get the following error message: Error: cannot allocate vector of size 1.2 Gb R(3122,0xa0ab44e0) malloc: *** mmap(size=1337688064) failed (error code=12) *** error: can't allocate region ***

Dear R users, Using R lme function, I found that both fixed and random effects of variable A on variable B are significant. Now, I'd like to analyze what variables are predicting differences in the slope. In other words, I'd like to know what variables (e.g., variable C) are predicting individual differences in the effects of A on B. I have many data points for A and B for each

Dear R list members, I have a question regarding xyplot. I managed to make a xyplot of all the IDs by using the syntax below: xyplot(PA ~ CRPC + CRPT | ID, data = redinteract) Now, I'd like to make a graph of a specific ID number (e.g., only ID number 301). I thought I could use "subset", but it seems to be not working. Could anyone let me know how I can make a graph of a

Hi all, I've been running loglinear models for three-way tables: one of the variables having three levels, and the other two having two levels each. An example looks like below: > yes.no <- c("Yes","No") > switch <- c("On","Off") > att <- c("BB","AA","CC") > L <- gl(2,1,12,yes.no) > T <-

Dear all, I am having v.4.36 of Quantreg package and I noticed strange behaviour when weights were added. Could anyone please explain me what if the results are really strange or the behavioiur is normal. As an example I am using dataset Engel from the package and my own weights. x<-engel[1:50,1] y<-engel[1:50,2] w<-c(0.00123, 0.00050, 0.00126, 0.00183, 0.00036, 0.00100, 0.00122,

Dear R-helpers, I'm analyzing a data with hierarchical linear model. I have one level 1 predictor and one level 2 predictor, which looks like below: fm1 <- lmer(y ~ 1 + x1 + x2 + x1:x2 + (1 + x1 | id.full)) where: y is the outcome variable. x1 is the level 1 predictor variable. x2 is the level 2 predictor variable. id.full is the conditioned variable. It runs beautifully when only x1

I've searched the Web with Google and do not find what might cause this particular error from an invocation of cenboxplot: cenboxplot(cu.t$quant, cu.t$ceneq1, cu.t$era, range=1.5, main='Total Recoverable Copper', ylab='Concentration (mg/L)', xlab='Time Period') Error in if (n > 0) (1L:n - a)/(n + 1 - 2 * a) else numeric() : argument is of length zero I do

Hi All, I have a data set wit three size classes (pico, nano and micro) and 12 different sites (Seamounts). I want to produce a table with the mean and standard deviation values for each site. Seamount Pico Nano Micro Total_Ch 1 Off_Mount 1 0.0691 0.24200 0.00100 0.31210 2 Off_Mount 1 0.0938 0.00521 0.02060 0.11961 3 Off_Mount 1 0.1130 0.20000 0.06620 0.37920 4 Off_Mount 1

Dear list members, I am trying to estimate parameters of the AR(1)-GARCH(1,1) model. I have one additional dummy variable for the AR(1) part. First I wanted to do it using garchFit function (everything would be then estimated in one step) however in the fGarch library I didn't find a way to include an additional variable. That would be the formula but, as said, I think it is impossible to add

Hi, I have generated a profile likelihood for a parameter (x) and am trying to get 95% confidence limits by calculating the two points where the log likelihood (LogL) is 2 units less than the maximum LogL. I would like to do this by linear interpolation and so I have been trying to use the function approxfun which allows me to get a function to calculate LogL for any value of x within

#is there a way to get NA in the table of descriptive statistics instead of the function stopping Thank you in advance #data x.f <- structure(list(Site = structure(c(9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L), .Label = c("BC", "HC", "RM119", "RM148", "RM179", "RM185",

Hello everyone, I have been doing a binary classification using random forest from the library "randomForest". One of the predictors is a factor variable, which is known to be highly related to the binary response I am trying to predict. Other 80 predictors are numeric. Totally I have 44 subjects. However, the random forest returns the factor variable as the least important one based on

Hi all, I am applying a Presence/absence Generalized additive model to model the distribution of marine algae species in R. I have found that log transforming the environmental variables improves the explained deviance of the model considerably. While log transforming is common practice in GLM, I have been unable to find any papers where this is performed in a GAM. Im wondering whether this

I?m running a model on animal behavior in response to shipping. In most cases, there is only one ship in the study area at one time. Ship length, distance from the animals, speed, angle from animals, and ship direction (as east/west bound) are among shipping-related covariates (with multiple interactions). The tricky part is that sometimes there are 2 ships in the area. I could add all the same

Hi Michael, > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Friendly > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:04 AM > To: Beno?t PELE <benoit.pele at acoss.fr>; r-help at r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R] Help : glm p-values for a factor predictor > > On 6/29/17 11:13 AM, Beno?t PELE wrote: > > My question is

On 9 May 2018 at 19:48, Dávid Bolvanský via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > But a fix needs to be made since branch predictor hints are broken in a > valid C++20 code: They don't affect performance in the expected way, but they also don't actually break code. I'm not saying it's not a bug, but it's certainly not on the same level as a miscompilation.

On 04 Jan 2011, at 08:30, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > I noticed that we generate code like this for i386 PIC: > > calll L0$pb > L0$pb: > popl %eax > movl %eax, -24(%ebp) ## 4-byte Spill > > I worry that this defeats the return address prediction for returns > in the function because calls and returns no longer are matched. According to benchmarks by