similar to: Weights in binomial glm

Hello R folks, I have three questions. I am trying to run a logistic regression (binomial family) where the response variable is a proportion. According to R Documentation in "a binomial GLM prior weights are used to give the number of trials when the response is the proportion of successes." However when I run my code I get the following error message: Error in

I ran logistic regression models last week using glm (...,family=binomial) and got a set of results. Since then I have loaded the Epi package for ROC analysis. Now when I run those same models I get completely different results, with most being: Warning message: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred in: glm.fit(x = X, y = Y, weights = weights, start = start, etastart = etastart,

Hi All, I have a problem with weighted logistic regression. I have a number of SNPs and a case/control scenario, but not all genotypes are as "guaranteed" as others, so I am using weights to downsample the importance of individuals whose genotype has been heavily "inferred". My data is quite big, but with a dummy example: > status <- c(1,1,1,0,0) > SNPs <-

Hi all, Could somebody be so kind to explain to me what is the saturated model on which deviance and degrees of freedom are calculated when fitting a binomial glm? Everything makes sense if I fit the model using as response a vector of proportions or a two-column matrix. But when the response is a factor and counts are specified via the "weights" argument, I am kind of lost as far as

Dear friends, I am testing glm as at page 514/515 of THE R BOOK by M.Crawley, that is on proportion data. I use glm(y~x1+,family=binomial) y is a proportion in (0,1), and x is a real number. I get the error: In eval(expr, envir, enclos) : non-integer #successes in a binomial glm! But that is exactly what was suggested in the book, where there is no mention of a similar warning. Where am I

Hi there I'm trying to fit a logistic regression model to data that looks very similar to the data in the sample below. I don't understand why I'm getting this error; none of the data are proportional and the weights are numeric values. Should I be concerned about the warning about non-integer successes in my binomial glm? If I should be, how do I go about addressing it? I'm

Dear R users, I am having some problems with glm. The first is an error message "subscript out of bounds". The second is the fact that reasonable starting values are not accepted by the function. To be more specific, here is an example: > success <- c(13,12,11,14,14,11,13,11,12) > failure <- c(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,2,2) > predictor <- c(0,80*5^(0:7)) >

Full_Name: S?ren Faurby Version: 2.4.1 and 2.7.2 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (192.38.46.92) There appear to be a bug in the estimation of significance in the binomial model in GLM. This bug apparently appears when the correlation between two variables is to strong. Such as this dummy example c(0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,1)->a a->b m1<-glm(a~b, binomial) summary(m1) It is sufficient that all

DeaR R-useRs, I'm trying to fit a logist model with these data: > dati y x 1 1 37 2 1 35 3 1 33 4 1 40 5 1 45 6 1 41 7 1 42 8 0 20 9 0 21 10 0 25 11 0 27 12 0 29 13 0 18 I use glm(), having this output: > g<-glm(y~x,family=binomial,data=dati) Warning messages: 1: Algorithm did not converge in: glm.fit(x = X, y = Y, weights = weights, start = start, etastart =

I got the following warning messages when I did a binomial logit regression using glm(): Warning messages: 1: Algorithm did not converge in: glm.fit(x = X, y = Y, weights = weights, start = start, etastart = etastart, 2: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred in: glm.fit(x = X, y = Y, weights = weights, start = start, etastart = etastart, Can some one share your thoughts on how to

Hi all, In my continuous transition of GLIM to R I try to make a glm with binomial errors. The data file have 3 vectors: h -> the factor that is ajusted (have 3 levels) d -> number of animais alive (the response) n -> total number of animals To test proportion of alive, make d/n. In GLIM: $yvar d$ $error binomial n$ $fit +h$ scale deviance = 25.730 (change = -9.138) at cycle 4

Hi, I had a logit regression, but don't really know how to handle the "Warning message: non-integer #successes in a binomial glm! in: eval(expr, envir, enclos)" problem. I had the same logit regression without weights and it worked out without the warning, but I figured it makes more sense to add the weights. The weights sum up to one. Could anyone give me some hint? Thanks a lot!

Dear friends, I'm doing a simulation on logistic regression model, but the programs can't work well,please help me to correct it and give some suggestions. My programs: data<-matrix(rnorm(400),ncol=8) #sample size is 50 data<-data.frame(data) names(data)<-c(paste("x",1:8,sep="")) #8 independent variables,x1-x8; #logistic regression model is

OK. We have now three suggestions to repair the text: - remove the text - add "not" at the beginning of the text - add at the end of the text a warning; something like: "Note that in this case the standard estimates of the parameters are in general not correct, and hence also the t values and the p value. Also the number of degrees of freedom is not correct. (The parameter

Hi all, I want to use weights for a logistic regression. In SAS, all I have to do is to specify my weight vector (they are fractions) and use proc logistic on my binary output. When I tried to do the same in R, I got an error message because my weights were not integer. I understand that the weight option in R is to be used when the dependent variable is a proportion so that the weight is the

Hi R-people: When I use the command to fit a model with an intercept, only: glm ( formula=haspdata ~ 1, data=dat, family=binomial, weights= dat$hy.wgt.s, subset=(dat$haspdat0!=3) ) I get the message: Warning message: non-integer #successes in a binomial glm! in: eval(expr, envir, enclos) Does anyone know what this means?? The data for this command is listed below. Thanks, Phil Smith CDC

Hi useRs, I'm experiencing something quite weird with glm() and weights, and maybe someone can explain what I'm doing wrong. I have a dataset where each row represents a single case, and I run glm(...,family="binomial") and get my coefficients. However, some of my cases have the exact same values for predictor variables, so I should be able to aggregate up my data frame and

I have a very simple problem. When using glm to fit binary logistic regression model, sometimes I receive the following warning: Warning messages: 1: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred in: glm.fit(x = X, y = Y, weights = weights, start = start, etastart = etastart, 2: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred in: glm.fit(x = X, y = Y, weights = weights, start = start,

Hello everyone, I am currently teaching an intermediate stats. course at UCSD Extension using R. We are using Venables and Ripley as the primary text for the course, with Freund & Wilson's Statistical Methods as a secondary reference. I recently gave a homework assignment on logistic regression, and I had a question about glm. Let n be the number of trials, p be the estimated

Hello, I was trying a glm fitting (as shown below) and I got a warning and a fitted residual deviance larger than the null deviance. Is this the expected behavor of glm? I would expect that even though the warning might be warranted I should not get worse fitting with an additional covariate in the model. Could anyone tell me what I'm missing? I get the same results in both R2.5.1 on windows