Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "median of two groups"
2009 Aug 26
3
mann whitney u
Dear Sir,
I am comparing two samples using wilcox.test in R. Literature appears to describe mann whitney u test as the most appropriate test to use on my data.
is the wilcox.test function equivalent to mann-whitney u? Is there a way to gain the U-value as apposed to the W-value in R?
Thank you
2003 Jun 11
1
qwilcox
The function 'wilcox.test' in R and S gives (almost) identical results (see
below). 'qwilcox' however, does not:
> qwilcox(p,5,5)
p: 0.025 0.975
--------------------
R> 3 22
S> 18 37
I originally wanted to ask a questions, but then I found the answer. Given
the confusion I run into, I wonder if this experience is worth reporting.
The
2012 May 29
2
Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U value: outcomes from different stat packages
Given this example
#start code
a<-c(0,70,50,100,70,650,1300,6900,1780,4930,1120,700,190,940,
760,100,300,36270,5610,249680,1760,4040,164890,17230,75140,1870,22380,5890,2430)
b<-c(0,0,10,30,50,440,1000,140,70,90,60,60,20,90,180,30,90,
3220,490,20790,290,740,5350,940,3910,0,640,850,260)
wilcox.test(a, b, paired=FALSE)
#sum of rank for first sample
sum.rank.a <-
2005 May 16
1
Mann-Whitney & Wilcoxon Rank Sum
Hello,
I am hoping someone could shed some light into the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
for me? In looking through Stats references, the Mann-Whitney U-test and
the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test are statistically equivalent. When using the
following dataset:
m <- c(2.0863,2.1340,2.1008,1.9565,2.0413,NA,NA)
f <- c(1.8938,1.9709,1.8613,2.0836,1.9485,2.0630,1.9143)
and the wilcox.test command as
2010 Aug 20
2
U value from wilcox.test
Dear all,
I want to compare the efficiency of 2 methods in extracting proteins from
algal samples. I collected 6 independant algal samples and I extracted 3 by
the method 1 and 3 others by the method 2.
So I have 2 groups of 3 samples, that are not paired. I would like to know
if the results obtained by these 2 methods are significantly different, I
hope method 2 to be more efficient than method
2007 Apr 17
2
help comparing two median with R
Dear R users,
I am new to R and I would like to ask your help with the following
topic. I have three sets of numeral data, 2 sets are paired and a
third is independent of the other two. For each of these sets I have
obtained their basic statistics (mean, median, stdv, range ...).
Now I want to compare if these sets differ. I could compare the mean
doing a basic T test . However, I was
2006 Aug 25
1
exact Wilcoxon signed rank test with ties and the "no longer under development" exactRanksumTests package
Dear List,
after updating the exactRanksumTests package I receive a warning that
the package is not developed any further and that one should consider
the coin package.
I don't find the signed rank test in the coin package, only the Wilcoxon
Mann Whitney U-Test. I only found a signed rank test in the stats
package (wilcox.test) which is able to calculate the exact pvalues but
unfortunately
2003 Dec 01
2
wilcoxon-pratt signed rank test in R - drug-effiacy
Hi.
I'm going to introduce the R-package for a group of medical doctors later
this week and is a little confused about there use of a test named
"willcoxon-pratt" for testing if the clinical and biochemical markers has
decreased significantly after the use of some drugs for a group of patients.
Looking into the R-functions I would in R recommand using a matched-pairs
Wilcoxon
2007 Aug 14
4
Mann-Whitney U
Hi,
Could someone please tell me how to perform a Mann-Whitney U test on a
dataset with 2 groups where one group has more data values than another?
I have split up my 2 groups into 2 columns in my .txt file i'm using with
R. Here is the code i have so far...
group1 <- c(LeafArea2)
group2 <- c(LeafArea1)
wilcox.test(group1, group2)
This code works for datasets with the same number
2005 Nov 14
1
effect sizes for Wilcoxon tests
Hello,
I use t.test for normal distributed and wilcox.test for non-normal
distributed samples.
It is easy to write a function for t.test that calculates the effect
size, because all parts of the formula are available from the t.test
result: r = sqrt(t*t / (t*t + df))
However, for Wilcoxon tests, the formula for effect sizes is:
r = Z / sqrt(N)
I wonder how I can calculate the Z-score in R for
2013 Oct 02
5
Interpreting the result of a Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney U) test
Hello everyone,
I'm having some trouble interpreting the results of a Wilcoxon
(Mann-Whitney U) test. Hope you can help.
This is the R script that I am running:
a <- c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 1,
1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 1)
b <- c(1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2)
wilcox.test(a, b, alternative="t", mu=0, exact=FALSE, paired=FALSE) #1st
2010 Oct 29
2
wilcox.test; data type conversion?
I'm working on a quick tutorial for my students, and was planning on
using Mann-Whitney U as one of the tests.
I have the following (fake) data
grade <- c("MVG", "VG", "VG", "G", "MVG", "G", "VG", "G", "VG")
sex <- c( "male", "male", "female", "male",
2005 Mar 02
2
wilcox.test statistics
Hi,
Could anyone provide the formula of the statistics which the wilcox.test
used for the two-sample rank-sum test? I got some statistics of 0 values,
but it is impossible to have 0 "rank-sum". Does the function use the
Mann-Whitney U test statistics? Thanks.
Ting-Yuan Liu
2007 Aug 15
0
Mann-Whitney U test discrepancies
Hi,
I do want to use the Mann-Whitney test which ranks my data and then
uses
those ranks rather than the actual data.
Here is the R code i am using:
group1<-
c(1.34,1.47,1.48,1.49,1.62,1.67,1.7,1.7,1.7,1.73,1.81,1.84,1.9,1.96,2,
2,2.19,2.29,2.29,2.41,2.41,2.46,2.5,2.6,2.8,2.8,3.07,3.3)
> group2<-
2007 May 05
1
NA in wilcox.test
Hello,
I'm trying to compare the allozyme data from two taxa. I have several
columns of data (19 loci) for each species. I want to do a Mann-Whitney
U-test or the wilcox.test (two sample Wilcoxon). When I try to run my code
(the first two columns are 1:name of the species, 2:name of individual) I
get the error message:
"Error in wilcox.test.default(CaScSc, CaScCo, alternative
2010 Feb 22
2
Siegel-Tukey test for equal variability (code)
Hi, I recently ran into the problem that I needed a Siegel-Tukey test for
equal variability based on ranks. Maybe there is a package that has it
implemented, but I could not find it. So I programmed an R function to do
it. The Siegel-Tukey test requires to recode the ranks so that they express
variability rather than ascending order. This is essentially what the code
further below does. After the
2006 Feb 15
3
wilcox.test returned estimates
Hi all,
I have being using wilcox.test to test for differences between 2 independent
samples. I had understood the difference in location to be conventionally the
difference in the sample medians however this is not the case when implemented
in R. I have tied ranks and therefore non-exact p-value and confidence
intervals are calculated due to the normal approximation. But what exactly is
this
2011 Jan 30
3
medians in Wilcoxon disagree with median function
I am sure I am opening myself up to looking stupid, but I have two samples
with medians of 613.5 and 189 (difference in location of 424 compared to
the difference suggested from the wilcoxon of 291.5)
> wilcox.test(pipwtCount,pipwdCount, conf.int=TRUE, na.rm=TRUE)
Wilcoxon rank sum test
data: pipwtCount and pipwdCount
W = 822, p-value = 0.01227
alternative hypothesis: true location
2003 Feb 15
2
How to code a bootstrap version of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (and variants)?
Hello,
can someone please help me with coding a function for a bootstrap WMW test (package boot, R under Windows, version 1.6.2)?
2009 Nov 18
1
mann-whitney test with more groups
Dear r-helpers,
I want to test groups of samples for significant differences.
Question: Does Group1 differ significantly from group2.
This is a question to be answered by mann-whitney-u-test.
I know that I can use wilcox.test with 2 samples.
My problem: How can r perform the test automatically if there are more than 2 groups in my data frame.
Test group1 vs. 2, 1 vs. 3, 1 vs. 4, etc.
This is